Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:03:06.142Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AFM Nanoindentation as a Method to Determine Microhardness of Hard Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

T. Bao
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106
P. W. Morrison Jr
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106
W. Woyczynski
Affiliation:
Department of StatisticsCase Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106
Get access

Abstract

This paper presents experimental and analytical studies of AFM nanoindentation as a method to determine microhardness of hard thin films. Indentations are performed on Au, Si, and DLC using triangular pyramidal diamond probes to determine microhardness. We examined the effects of indentation force and three different methods to measure the indentation area (direct area measurement for a triangular indentation, size analysis of an inverted AFM image of the indentation, and prediction of area from indentation depth based on a tip shape function). The responses are indentation depth, projection area, and microhardness. Relationship of responses with indentation force is examined. At a low depth range, microhardness based on pyramidal shape function is erroneously higher than the other two methods. However, all three methods generally agree with each other when indentation force exceeds 16μN. Size analysis of inverted images gives more consistent microhardness with the least variability over the whole force (4∼30μN) or depth (0.5∼70 nm) range. Tip shape models are developed to predict microhardness. The ellipsoidal tip model is a good approximation at low depth ranges, while the pyramidal model works better for deeper indentations. The force vs area curves are also significantly nonlinear which can distort the hardness measurements.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Tabor, D., Phil. Mag. 74(5), 1207 (1996).10.1080/01418619608239720Google Scholar
2. Matsuda, K. and Kaneta, M., Phil. Mag. 74(5), 1171 (1996).Google Scholar
3. Tabor, D., The hardness of metals (At the Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1951).Google Scholar
4. Ezhov, Y. V., Journal of Testing and Evaluation 24(5), 320 (1996).Google Scholar
5. Boyer, H. (ed.), Hardness testing (ASM International, Metals Park, OH, 1987).Google Scholar
6. Lysaght, V. E. and DeBellis, A., Hardness Testing Handbook (American Chain & Cable Co., INc., USA, 1969-1974).Google Scholar
7. Burnham, N. and Colton, R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 7 (4, Jul/Aug), 290 (1989).Google Scholar
8. Bhushan, B. and Koinkar, V., Appl. Phys. Lett. 64(13), 1653 (1994).10.1063/1.111949Google Scholar
9. Bhushan, B. and Kulkarni, A., Phil. Mag. 74(5), 1117 (1996).10.1080/01418619608239712Google Scholar
10. Scholl, D., Everson, M., and Jaklevic, R., J. Mater. Res. 10(10), 2503 (1995).10.1557/JMR.1995.2503Google Scholar
11. Vanlandingham, W. et al., J. Mat. Sci. Lett. 16, 117 (1997).10.1023/A:1018533708655Google Scholar
12. Binnig, G., Quate, C. F., and Gerber, C., Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 930 (1986).Google Scholar
13. Binnig, G., Rohrer, H., Gerber, C., and Wiebel, E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 40, 178 (1982).10.1063/1.92999Google Scholar
14. Ikai, A., Surf. Sci. Rep. 26, 261 (1996).Google Scholar
15. Montgomery, D., Design and Analysis of Experiments, third ed. (John Wiley & sons, 1991).Google Scholar
16. Gubicza, J., Juhász, A., and Lendvai, J., J. Mater. Res. 11(12), 2964 (1996).Google Scholar
17. Doemner, M. and Nix, W., J. Mater. Res. 1, 601 (1986).10.1557/JMR.1986.0601Google Scholar
18. Petzold, M., Landgraf, J., et al., Thin Solid Films 264(2), 153 (1995).10.1016/0040-6090(95)05855-9Google Scholar
19. AFM staff, Support Note for Nanoindentation and Nanoscratching by SPMs, No. 225, Rev. C (Digital Insruments, Santa Barbara, CA, 1996).Google Scholar