Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:58:22.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Designing heterogeneous hierarchical material systems: a holistic approach to structural and materials design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2019

Emily Ryan ,
Zoe A. Pollard ,
Quang-Thinh Ha ,
Athar Roshandelpoor ,
Pirooz Vakili  and
Jillian L. Goldfarb
Emily Ryan*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
Zoe A. Pollard
Affiliation:
Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Quang-Thinh Ha
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
Athar Roshandelpoor
Affiliation:
Division of Systems Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
Pirooz Vakili
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA Division of Systems Engineering, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA
Jillian L. Goldfarb
Affiliation:
Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
*
Address all correspondence to Emily Ryan at [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Many materials systems comprise complex structures where multiple materials are integrated to achieve a desired performance. Often in these systems, it is a combination of both the materials and their structure that dictate performance. Here the authors layout an integrated computational–statistical–experimental methodology for hierarchical materials systems that takes a holistic design approach to both the material and structure. The authors used computational modeling of the physical system combined with statistical design of experiments to explore an activated carbon adsorption bed. The large parameter space makes experimental optimization impractical. Instead, a computational–statistical approach is coupled with physical experiments to validate the optimization results.

Type
Artificial Intelligence Research Letters
Information
MRS Communications , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , June 2019 , pp. 628 - 636
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Işıtan, S., Ceylan, S., Topcu, Y., Hintz, C., Tefft, J., Chellappa, T., Guo, J., and Goldfarb, J.L.: Product quality optimization in an integrated biorefinery: conversion of pistachio nutshell biomass to biofuels and activated biochars via pyrolysis. Energy Convers. Manag. 127, 576–588 (2016).Google Scholar
2.Parlett, C.M.A., Wilson, K. and Lee, A.F.: Hierarchical porous materials: catalytic applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 3876–3893 (2013).Google Scholar
3.Siankevich, S., Savoglidis, G., Fei, Z., Laurenczy, G., Alexander, D.T.L., Yan, N., and Dyson, P.J.: A novel platinum nanocatalyst for the oxidation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural into 2,5-furandicarboxylic acid under mild conditions. J. Catal. 315, 67–74 (2014).Google Scholar
4.Samassekou, H., Alkabsh, A., Stiwinter, K., Khatri, A., and Mazumdar, D.: Atomic-level insights through spectroscopic and transport measurements into the large-area synthesis of MoS2 thin films. MRS Commun. 8, 1328–1334 (2018).Google Scholar
5.Wang, Y., Cao, S., Liu, H., Zhu, M., and Obrovac, M.N.: Si–TiN alloy Li-ion battery negative electrode materials made by N2 gas milling. MRS Commun. 8, 1352–1357 (2018).Google Scholar
6.Yuan, Y., Chen, R., Zhang, H., Liu, Q., Liu, J., Yu, J., Wang, C., Sun, Z., and Wang, J.: Hierarchical NiSe@Co2(CO3)(OH)2 heterogeneous nanowire arrays on nickel foam as electrode with high areal capacitance for hybrid supercapacitors. Electrochim. Acta 294, 325–336 (2019).Google Scholar
7.Maneerung, T., Tokura, S., and Rujiravanit, R.: Impregnation of silver nanoparticles into bacterial cellulose for antimicrobial wound dressing. Carbohydr. Polym. 72, 43–51 (2008).Google Scholar
8.Uzunoglu, A., Kose, D.A., Kose, K., Gokmese, E., and Gokmese, F.: PdAg-decorated three-dimensional reduced graphene oxide-multi-walled carbon nanotube hierarchical nanostructures for high-performance hydrogen peroxide sensing. MRS Commun. 8, 680–686 (2018).Google Scholar
9.ElMekawy, A., Hegab, H.M., Pant, D., and Saint, C.P.: Bio-analytical applications of microbial fuel cell-based biosensors for onsite water quality monitoring. J. Appl. Microbiol. 124, 302–313 (2018).Google Scholar
10.Mallikarjuna, K., Sushma, N.J., Reddy, B.V.S., Narasimha, G., Deva, B., and Raju, P.: Palladium nanoparticles: single-step plant-mediated green chemical procedure using Piper betle leaves broth and their anti-fungal studies. Int. J. Chem. Anal. Sci. 4, 14–18 (2013).Google Scholar
11.Ji, L., Chen, W., Duan, L., and Zhu, D.: Mechanisms for strong adsorption of tetracycline to carbon nanotubes: a comparative study using activated carbon and graphite as adsorbents. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 2322–2327 (2009).Google Scholar
12.Hofmann, A.F., Fronczek, D.N., and Bessler, W.G.: Mechanistic modeling of polysulfide shuttle and capacity loss in lithium-sulfur batteries. J. Power Sources 259, 300–310 (2014).Google Scholar
13.Tan, J. and Ryan, E.M.: Computational study of electro-convection effects on dendrite growth in batteries. J. Power Sources 323, 67–77 (2016).Google Scholar
14.Ryan, E.M. and Mukherjee, P.P.: Mesoscale modeling in electrochemical devices—A critical perspective. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 71, 118–142 (2019).Google Scholar
15.Mistry, A.N. and Mukherjee, P.P.: Probing spatial coupling of resistive modes in porous intercalation electrodes through impedance spectroscopy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21, 3805–3813 (2018).Google Scholar
16.Chen, C.-F., Mistry, A., and Mukherjee, P.P.: Probing impedance and microstructure evolution in lithium–sulfur battery electrodes. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 21206–21216 (2017).Google Scholar
17.Mistry, A.N., smith, k, and Mukherjee, P.P.: Electrochemistry coupled mesoscale complexations in electrodes lead to thermo-electrochemical extremes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 28644–28655 (2018).Google Scholar
18.Nelson, G.J., Ausderau, L.J., Shin, S., Buckley, J.R., Mistry, A., Mukherjee, P.P., and De Andrade, V.: Transport-Geometry interactions in Li-ion cathode materials imaged using X-ray nanotomography. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, A1412–A1424 (2017).Google Scholar
19.Mistry, A.N. and Mukherjee, P.P.: Precipitation–microstructure interactions in the Li–sulfur battery electrode. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 26256–26264 (2017).Google Scholar
20.Stein, M., Mistry, A., and Mukherjee, P.P.: Mechanistic understanding of the role of evaporation in electrode processing. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, A1616–A1627 (2017).Google Scholar
21.El-Qanni, A., Nassar, N.N., and Vitale, G.: A combined experimental and computational modeling study on adsorption of propionic acid onto silica-embedded NiO/MgO nanoparticles. Chem. Eng. J. 327, 666–677 (2017).Google Scholar
22.Weissman, S.A. and Anderson, N.G.: Design of experiments (DoE) and process optimization. A review of recent publications. Org. Process Res. Dev. 19, 1605–1633 (2015).Google Scholar
23.Lillo-Ródenas, M.A., Fletcher, A.J., Thomas, K.M., Cazorla-Amorós, D., and Linares-Solano, A.: Competitive adsorption of a benzene–toluene mixture on activated carbons at low concentration. Carbon N. Y. 44, 1455–1463 (2006).Google Scholar
24.Lillo-Ródenas, M.A., Cazorla-Amorós, D., and Linares-Solano, A.: Behaviour of activated carbons with different pore size distributions and surface oxygen groups for benzene and toluene adsorption at low concentrations. Carbon N. Y. 43, 1758–1767 (2005).Google Scholar
25.Oakley, J. and O'Hagan, A.: Bayesian inference for the uncertainty distribution of computer model outputs. Biometrika 89, 769–784 (2002).Google Scholar
26.Myers, R.H., Montgomery, D.C., and Anderson-Cook, C.M.: Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments, 4th ed. (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2016).Google Scholar
27.Shahriari, B., Swersky, K., Wang, Z., R. P. Adams and N. de Freitas: Taking the human Out of the loop: a review of Bayesian optimization. Proc. IEEE 104, 148–175 (2016).Google Scholar
28.Frazier, P.I. and Wang, J.: Bayesian Optimization for Materials Design, edited by Lookman, T., Alexander, F.J., Rajan, K. (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-23871-5_3.Google Scholar
29.Rubahamya, B., Kumar Reddy, K.S., Prabhu, A., Al Shoaibi, A., and Srinivasakannan, C.: Porous carbon screening for benzene sorption. Environ. Prog. Sustainable Energy 38, S93–S99 (2018).Google Scholar
30.Tseng, H.H., Wey, M.Y., Liang, Y.S., and Chen, K.H.: Catalytic removal of SO2, NO and HCl from incineration flue gas over activated carbon-supported metal oxides. Carbon N. Y. 41, 1079–1085 (2003).Google Scholar
31.Li, L., Quinlivan, P.A., and Knappe, D.R.U.: Effects of activated carbon surface chemistry and pore structure on the adsorption of organic contaminants from aqueous solution. Carbon N. Y. 40, 2085–2100 (2002).Google Scholar
32.Montgomery, D.C.: Design and Analysis of Experiments, 8th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 2013).Google Scholar
33.Battiato, I., Tartakovsky, D.M., Tartakovsky, A.M., and Scheibe, T.D.: Hybrid models of reactive transport in porous and fractured media. Adv. Water Resour. 34, 1140–1150 (2011).Google Scholar
34.Plimpton, S.: Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995).Google Scholar
35.Ryan, E.M. and Tartakovsky, A.M.: A hybrid micro-scale model for transport in connected macro-pores in porous media. J. Contam. Hydrol. 126, 61–71 (2011).Google Scholar
36.Ryan, E.M., Tartakovsky, A.M., and Amon, C.: Pore scale modeling of competitive adsorption in a porous Medium. J. Contam. Hydrol. 120–121, 56–78 (2011).Google Scholar
37.Meakin, P. and Tartakovsky, A.M.: Modeling and simulation of pore scale multiphase fluid flow and reactive transport in fractured and porous media. Rev. Geophys. 47, RG3002 (2009).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Ryan et al. supplementary material

Ryan et al. supplementary material 1

Download Ryan et al. supplementary material(File)
File 909.7 KB