Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:11:34.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reducing Industrial Energy Use and CO2 Emissions: The Role of Materials Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Dolf Gielen ,
John Newman  and
Martin K. Patel
Dolf Gielen
Affiliation:
International Energy Agency, France
John Newman
Affiliation:
International Energy Agency, France
Martin K. Patel
Affiliation:
Utrecht University, The Netherlands

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Nearly one-third of the world's energy consumption and 36% of its carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions are attributable to manufacturing industries. However, the adoption of advanced technologies already in commercial use could provide technical energy savings in industry of 27–41 exajoules (EJ), along with a reduction in CO2 emissions of 2.2–3.2 gigatonnes (Gt) per year, about 7–12% of today's global CO2 emissions. Even more significant savings can be attained on the supply side if fuel switching and CO2 capture and storage are considered. However, such changes must start in the coming decade to have a substantial impact by 2050.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 33 , Issue 4: Harnessing Materials for Energy , April 2008 , pp. 471 - 477
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

References

1.Tracking Industrial Energy Use and CO2 Emissions. (IEA/OECD, Paris, 2007).Google Scholar
2.Gielen, D.J., Taylor, M., Energy Econ. 29 (4), 889 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Birat, J.-P., “DSTI/SU/SC” 68 (OECD Steel Committee Meeting, Paris, November 13, 2006).Google Scholar
4.Fleming, A., Operation Maintenance and Materials Issue 1 (2) (2002).Google Scholar
5.Lee, N., Sahajwalla, V., Khanna, R., Lindblom, B., Hallin, M., Proceedings Ishii Symposium on Sustainable Ironmaking, Sydney (Cooperative Research Centre for Coal in Sustainable Development CCSD, Brisbane, Australia, March 2–3, 2006).Google Scholar
6.Shi, C., J. Mat. Civ. Eng. 16 (3), 230 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Justnes, H., Elfgren, L., Ronin, V., Cem. Conc. Res. 35 (2), 315 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Sobolev, K., Naik, T.R., CANMET/ACI Three-Day International Symposium on Sustainable Development of Cement and Concrete (Toronto, Canada, October 5–7. 2005).Google Scholar
9.Laursen, S.E., Hansen, J., Bagh, J., Jensen, O.K., Werther, I. (Ministry of Environment and Energy, Denmark, Danish Environment Protection Agency, Environmental Project No. 369, 1997).Google Scholar
10.Patel, M., Crank, M., Dornburg, V., Hermann, B., Roes, L., Hüsing, B., van Overbeek, L., Terragni, F., Recchia, E., “Medium and long-term opportunities and risks of the biotechnological production of bulk chemicals from renewable resources—The BREW Project” (European Commission's GROWTH Programme, DG Research, Coordinated by Utrecht University, Netherlands, September 2006).Google Scholar
11.Garg, N., Geetanjali, , Agron. Sustain. Dev 27, 59 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar