Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:05:52.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pair Potentials in Atomistic Computer Simulations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

Computer modeling of crystal defects ranges at present from generic empirical investigations to first-principle quantum-mechanical calculations (see, for example, References 1–4). Descriptions of atomic interactions in terms of pair potentials dominated such studies until the early 1980s, and many fundamental features of lattice defects and interfaces were revealed in these calculations. The generic results of these studies withstood the test of time, and calculations employing more sophisticated schemes usually confirmed their validity. An early example goes back to the late 1950s when Vineyard and co-workers pioneered the very first computer simulations in their studies of radiation damage. Empirical pair potentials were used in these investigations in which many fundamental, generic aspects of the effect of irradiation of crystalline materials by energetic particles were discovered.

Such simple treatments of atomic interactions may appear totally inadequate from the point of view of pure physics. However, it must be recognized that the purpose of the majority of atomistic studies of lattice defects has been to elucidate atomic structure and atomic-level properties in materials with given: (a) crystal structure, (b) elastic properties and possibly phonon spectra, (c) values of certain material parameters such as vacancy formation energies and stacking fault energies, and (d) in alloys, alloying and ordering energies, and possibly antiphase boundary energies. This is in contrast with ab initio studies, the objective of which is to determine all these properties from first principles. These goals of atomistic studies are, of course, the same for all semi-empirical approaches discussed in this collection of articles. In general, the validity of the structural features of lattice defects found in calculations using empirical schemes is best guaranteed if they can be related to fitted material properties and are not sensitively dependent on the deails of the fittings and functional forms employed.

Type
Interatomic Potentials for Atomistic Simulations
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Vitek, V. and Srolovitz, D.J., eds., Atomistic Simulation of Materials. Beyond Pair Potential (Plenum Press, New York, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Tersoff, J., Vanderbilt, D., and Vitek, V., eds., Atomic Scale Calculations in Materials Science (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 141, Pittsburgh, 1989).Google Scholar
3.Mark, J.E., Glicksman, M.E., and Marsh, S.P., eds., Computational Methods in Materials Science (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 278, Pittsburgh, 1992).Google Scholar
4.Broughton, J., Bristowe, P., and Newsam, J., eds., Materials Theory and Modelling (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 291, Pittsburgh, 1993).Google Scholar
5.Goland, A.N., Milgram, M., and Vineyard, G.H., Phys. Rev. 120 (1960) p. 1229.Google Scholar
6.Vitek, V. and De Hosson, J.T.M., in Computer-Based Microscopic Description of the Structure and Properties of Materials, edited by Broughton, J., Krakow, W., and Pantelides, S.T. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 63, Pittsburgh, 1986) p. 125.Google Scholar
7.Carlsson, A.E., in Solid State Physics, vol. 43, edited by Ehrenreich, H. and Turnbull, D. (Academic Press, New York, 1990) p. 1.Google Scholar
8.Harrison, W.A., Electronic Structure and Properties of Solids (Freeman, San Francisco, 1980).Google Scholar
9.Pettifor, D.G., Bonding and Structure of Molecules and Solids (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Torrens, I.M., Interatomic Potentials (Academic Press, New York, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Gehlen, P., Beeler, J., and Jaffee, R., eds., Interatomic Potentials and Simulation of Lattice Defects (Plenum Press, New York, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Lee, J.K., ed., Interatomic Potentials and Crystalline Defects (TMS, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1981).Google Scholar
13.Born, M. and Huang, K., Dynamical Theory of Crystal Lattices (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1954).Google Scholar
14.Morse, P.M., Phys. Rev. 34 (1929) p. 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Lennard-Jones, J.E., Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 106 (1924) p. 463.Google Scholar
16.Born, M. and Mayer, J.E., Z. Phys. 75 (1932) p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Lindhard, J., K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. Mat. Fys. Med. 28 (1954) p. 28.Google Scholar
18.Pettifor, D.G. and Ward, M.A., Solid State Com. 49 (1984) p. 291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Dagens, L., Rasolt, L. M., and Taylor, R., Phys. Rev. B 11 (1975) p. 2726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Johnson, R.A., Physical Review A 134 (1964) p. 1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Johnson, R.A., J. Phys. F: Metal Phys. 3 (1973) p. 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Vitek, V., Philos. Mag. A 58 (1988) p. 193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Duesbery, M.S., in Dislocations in Solids, vol. 8, edited by Nabarro, F.R.N., (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1989) p. 67.Google Scholar
24.Vitek, V., Prog. Mater. Sci. 36 (1992) p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Sutton, A.P. and Balluffi, R.W., Interfaces in Crystalline Materials (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995).Google Scholar
26.Vitek, V., ed., Amorphous Materials: Modelling of Structure and Properties (TMS, Warrendale, Pennsylvania, 1983).Google Scholar
27.Girifalco, L.A., J. Phys. Chem. 96 (1992) p. 858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Wolf, D., Lutsko, J.F., and Kluge, M., in Atomistic Simulations of Materials: Beyond Pair Potentials, edited by Vitek, V. and Srolovitz, D. (Plenum Press, New York, 1989) p. 245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Farkas, D. and Rodriguez, P.L., Scripta Metall. Mat. 30 (1994) p. 921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar