Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:57:33.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Material Matters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

W. Stoll

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The following article is based on a talk for Symposium X presented by Wolfgang Stoll, Chief Scientific Advisor and Consultant in Siemens, Germany, at the 1996 MRS Fall Meeting.

Since 1941 when Glenn Seaborg first isolated plutonium in milligram quantities, the total amount converted through neutron capture in U-238 has increased worldwide to about 1,200 tons and continues to grow about 70 tons/year. What was fissioned in situ in operating nuclear power stations is roughly equivalent to 5 billion tons of black coal, while the fission energy contained in those 1,200 tons unloaded in spent fuel is equivalent to another 2 billion tons of coal. About 260 of these 1,200 tons are ready to release their energy in about 4 kg-portions each in microseconds which is equivalent to 10,000 tons of coal. Most people believe this release of energy poses a major threat of the worldwide arsenal of weapons of mass destruction (WMD). The about 20-fold overkill stored in worldwide WMD is considered superfluous after the crumbling of the Soviet Union. Options are sought to dispose of this surplus in a safe, speedy, and controllable manner. While for highly enriched uranium (HEU) (the other nuclear weapons material) dilution into low-enriched uranium and utilization in current light water reactors (LWR) poses market adaptation problems only, and while the worldwide consensus on the elimination of chemical and biological WMD is still in an initial phase, the decision of both the United States (US) and the former Soviet Union (FSU) to remove most of the plutonium out of weapons looks as if it was a firm political decision.

Type
Material Matters
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , March 1998 , pp. 6 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

References

1.Nuclear News: World List of Nuclear Power Plants, Aug. 1994, Vol. 37 and Lit.Google Scholar
2.Albright, D., Berkout, F., Walker, W.: World Inventory of Plutonium and Highly Enriched Uranium 1992 (Oxford University Press, New York, 1992).Google Scholar
3. “Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty,” signed July 31, 1991, and addendum by President Bush's Initiative from September 27, 1991.Google Scholar
4.Management and Disposition of Excess Weapons Plutonium (National Academy of Science, Washington, DC, 1994) chap. 6.3.Google Scholar
5.Schlosser, G.et al., Optimierung der Pu-Verwendung im geschlossenen LWR-kreislauf, Bericht BMFT AtT 7686/9.Google Scholar
6.Field, B.T., Marc, C.et al: Impact of New Technologies on the Arms Race, Pugwash-Monograph (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 1971) pp. 137–138.Google Scholar
7.Ferguson, D.E., “Simple Quick Processing Plant,” memo to Culler, Floyd, August 30, 1977, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.Google Scholar
8.Dzekun, E., and Romanovsky, V., “First HLW Partitioning Installation in Russia is Operable,” Russian Minatom Monitor, August 19, 1996.Google Scholar
9.Cohen, B.L., Plutonium Toxicity, (Nuclear Engineering International, November 1976) pp. 35–38.Google Scholar
10.Volz, G.L.et al., “A 37-Year Medical Followup of Manhattan Project Pu-Workers,” Health Physics 48 No. 3 (1985) pp. 249–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Tietjen, G.L., “Plutonium and Lung Cancer,” Health Physics 52 (1987) pp. 625–628.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Larson, R.P. and Oldham, R.D., “Plutonium in Drinking Water: Effects of Chlorination,” Science 201 (September 15, 1980) p. 10,008.Google Scholar
13.Friedman, A.M., “Actinides in the Environment,” ACS Symposium Series 35 (1976) p. 92, Table 1.Google Scholar
14.Clayton, E.D., “Fissionability and Criticality: From Protactinium to Californium and Beyond,” Nucl. Sci. Eng. 52 (1973) p. 417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Heising-Goodman, C.D., “An Evaluation of the Pu Denaturing Concept as an Effective Safeguards Method,” Nucl. Technol. 50 (1980) p. 242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Trutnev, Y.A. and Chemychev, A.K. (Arasmas 16): CHETEK-concept, presented at the Fourth International Workshop on Nuclear Warhead Elimination, Washington, DC, February 26–27, 1992.Google Scholar
17. (Th, Pu)O2 and a process for fabricating this, German Patent Application No. 195 26 776-A1 (July 21, 1995).Google Scholar
18. AUPuC-Process, D.P. 28 11 959 (March 18, 1978), p. 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Cowan, G.A., “A Natural Fission Reactor,” Sci. Am. 1 (1989) pp. 36–47.Google Scholar
20.Weber, W.J., Ewing, R.C., and Lutze, W., “Long Term Performance of Zircon as a Waste Form for the Disposal of Weapons-Grade Plutonium,” Nature 389 (1996).Google Scholar
21.Albright, D., Berkout, F., Walker, W., World Inventory of Plutonium and Highly Enriched Uranium 1992 (Oxford University Press, New York, 1992), Table 12.2 and 12.3.Google Scholar
22.Simon, W.A., “GT-MHR, Removing the Pu with the Multi-Purpose Modular Helium Reactor,” General Atomics, GT-015 (January 31, 1995).Google Scholar
23. AUPuC-Process, D.P. 28 11 959 (March 18, 1978).Google Scholar
24.Kurina, I.S. and Lopatinsky, V.N.et al., “Research and Development of MgO-Base Matrix Fuel,” Technical Committee of IAEA, Moscow, Oct. 1996.Google Scholar
25. “Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty,” March 5, 1970.Google Scholar
26.Egorov, N.N. and Mugorov, V.M.et al., Management of Plutonium in Russia, NATO Workshop on MOX, OBNISK, Oct. 16–19, 1994.Google Scholar
27.Kotchetkov, L.A., Kiriushin, A.I., and Sarayev, O.M., “Erfahrungen der Entwicklung von Schnellen Brutreaktoren,” Teploenergetica 8 (August 1993).Google Scholar
28. Technische Srudie über die Produktion von U-Pu-Brennstoff, GRS-Minatom Feb. 1995.Google Scholar
29.Safety Assessment of Radioactive Waste Repositories, Symposium NEA/IAEA//EG Paris, (Paris, OECD, 1990).Google Scholar
30.OECD/NEA, Nuclear Power and Nuclear Fuel Cycle Data in OECD Member Countries, (Paris, OECD, 1985).Google Scholar
31.Trauwaert, E. and Demonie, M., “Plutonium Handling and Vitrification,” in Disposal of Weapon Pu, edited by Merz, E.R. and Walter, C.E. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA 1996) pp. 51–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar