Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:36:54.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Magnetic Storage: Principles and Trends

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

James U. Lemke
Get access

Extract

Magnetic recording can store digital information at an areal density well beyond the fundamental density-limit of optical systems. The central problems in achieving high trans-optical information density with magnetic recording reside primarily in the materials area. In addition to improved magnetic properties, such as head materials with high saturation magnetization and recording media with low noise and high coercivity, tribological considerations impose constraints on the ultimate density that will be attained. The exponential loss of signal due to spacing between the head and recording medium is inherent in all magnetic recording, necessitating the development of durable quasi-contact interfaces.

Magnetic recording is the universal technology for electronic information mass storage. Its presence is ubiquitous as audio tapes, VCRs, floppy disks, computer hard disks, credit cards, etc. Sales of magnetic recording products exceed $50 billion annually, with strong growth projected into the foreseeable future. A steady progression in storage density and corresponding reduction in cost has characterized all phases of magnetic recording; the literature is replete with historical and projective curves showing cost and density numbers. Computer disk file memories have doubled in areal density every 2.5 years for about the past 30 years. Although many competing technologies have been proposed through the years, none has been able to displace or even significantly impact magnetic recording. The first challenge was thermoplastic recording, followed by at least three resurrections of magneto-optic recording, bubbles, semiconductors, and various nonmagnetic optical storage devices.

Type
Magnetic Recording Materials
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , March 1990 , pp. 31 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Wallace, R.L., Bell Syst. Tech. J. 30 (1951) p. 1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Bertram, H.N. and Niedermeyer, R., IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG-18 (1982) p. 1206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Lemke, J.U., J. Appl. Phys. 53 (1982) p. 2361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Wohlfarth, E.P., Magnetism, Vol. III (Academic Press, New York, 1963) p. 351.Google Scholar
5.Sugaya, H., in Magnetic Recording Handbook, edited by Mee, and Daniel, (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1989) p. 294.Google Scholar
6.Hirota, E., Hirota, K., and Kugiyama, K., Ferrites: Proc. of Intl. Conf. (1980) p. 667.Google Scholar
7.Hunt, R., IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG-7 (1971) p. 150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Bajorek, C.H., Romankiw, L.T., and Thompson, D.A., U.S. Patent 3,840,898 (1974).Google Scholar
9.Jeffers, F.J., McClure, R.J., French, W.W., and Griffith, N.J., IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG-18 (1982) p. 1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Speliotis, D.E., and Morrison, J., IBM J. Res. Dev. 10 (1966) p. 233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Kubo, O., Ido, T., and Yokoyama, H., IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG-18 (1982) p. 1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Freiser, M.J., IBM J. Res. Dev. 23 (1979) p. 330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Arai, Y. and Nahara, A., U.S. Patent 4,419,404 (1983).Google Scholar
14.Lemke, J.U., Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 189 (1972) p. 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar