Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T13:32:07.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Links of Science & Technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Nicholas DeCristofaro
Get access

Extract

On April 13, 1982, the Duke Power Company energized an experimental pad-mount distribution transformer in Hickory, North Carolina. The transformer, manufactured by General Electric, provided electric power to a local residence. That same month, the Georgia Power Company installed a similar transformer, made by Westinghouse Electric, atop a utility pole in Athens, Georgia. It supplied electricity for the exterior lights at the Westinghouse Newton Bridge Road plant. These devices shown in Figure 1 were unique among the nearly 40 million distribution transformers in service in the United States because their magnetic cores were made from an Fe–B–Si amorphous-metal alloy. This new material, produced by Allied-Signal (formerly Allied Chemical), was capable of magnetizing more efficiently than any electrical steel. By replacing grain-oriented silicon steel in the transformer cores, the amorphous metal reduced the core losses of the transformers by 75%.

Although distribution transformers are relatively efficient devices, often operating at efficiencies as high as 99% at full load, they lose a significant amount of energy in their use. Because of the number of units in service, coupled with the fact that the core material is continuously magnetized and demagnetized at line frequency, transformers account for the largest portion of the energy losses on electric power distribution systems. It is estimated that over 50 × 109 kWh are dissipated annually in the United States in the form of distribution transformer core losses. At today's average electricity generating cost of $0.035/kWh, that energy is worth over $1,500 million.

Type
Departments
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 23 , Issue 5 , May 1998 , pp. 50 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Lowdermilk, L. (private communication).Google Scholar
2.Evans, J., Athens (GA) Daily News, April 19, 1982.Google Scholar
3.Werner, E., in Energy Efficient Electrical Steels (TMS-AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1981) p. 1.Google Scholar
4.Brenner, A., Couch, D.E., and Williams, E.K., J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 44 (1950) p. 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Klement, W. Jr., Willens, R.H., and Duwez, P., Nature 187 (1960) p. 869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Cohen, H. and Turnbull, D., Nature 189 (1960) p. 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Hansen, M., Constitution of Binary Alloys, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1958) p. 232.Google Scholar
8.Chen, H.S. and Polk, D.E., U.S. Patent No. 3,856,513 (December 24, 1974).Google Scholar
9.Lang, E.M., U.S. Patent No. 112,505 (February 21, 1871).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.In Chem. Eng. News (1973) p. 24.Google Scholar
11.Narasimhan, M., U.S. Patent No. 4,142,571 (March 6, 1979).Google Scholar
12.Heinemann, W., in Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Rapidly Quenched Metals, edited by Steeb, S. and Warlimont, H. (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1985) p. 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. For example, see Technical Bulletin: METGLAS® 2605 SA-1 Alloy (AlliedSignal, Parsippany, NJ, 1996).Google Scholar
14.Duwez, P. and Lin, S.C., J. Appl. Phys. 38 (1967) p. 4097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Gubanov, I., Sov. Phys. Solid. State 2 (1960) p. 468.Google Scholar
16.Egami, T., Flanders, P.J., and Graham, C.D. Jr., in AIP Conf. Proc. 24 (1975) p. 697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Luborsky, F.E., Becker, J J., and Mc-Cary, R.O., IEEE Trans. Magn. 11 (1975) p. 1644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. For example, see Bulletin M-301 Armco 7-Mil Oriented M-2 and 9-Mil Oriented M-3 Electrical Steels, Armco Oriented and TRANCOR H Electrical Steels, (Armco Inc., Middletown, OH, 1990).Google Scholar
19.Tsuai, C.C., Longworth, G., and Lin, S.C.H., Phys. Rev. 170 (1968) p. 603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Kikuchi, M., Fujimori, H., Obi, Y., and Masumoto, T., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 14 (1975) p. 1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Hasegawa, R., O'Handley, R.C., and Mendelsohn, L.I., in AIP Conf. Proc. 34 (1976) p. 298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Dougherty, J., EPRI J. (1980) p. 46; M. Mitera, T. Masumoto, and N.S. Kazama, J. Appl. Phys. 50 (1979) p. 7609.Google Scholar
23.Fredberg, R. and Paul, D. I., Phys. Rev. Lett. 34 (1975) p. 1234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Fujiwara, T., J. Phys. F 9 (1979) p. 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Osaka Transformer (private communication).Google Scholar
26.Ramanan, R.V. and Liebermann, H.H., Appl. Phys. 73 (1993) p. 5366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Lowdermilk, L. and Lee, A.C., “Five Years Operating Experience with Amorphous Transformers,” Hard and Soft Magnetic Materials ASM (1988).Google Scholar
28.Matsuura, T., Nagayama, K., Hagiwara, S., and Higaki, M., IEEE Trans. Magn. 26 (1990) p. 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Utroska, D., Electr. Light Power (1980) p. 54.Google Scholar
30.Ballard, D.E. and Klappert, W., U.S. Patent No. 5,050,294 (September 24, 1991).Google Scholar
31.Lee, A.C. and Ballard, D.E., U.S. Patent No. 4,741,096 (May 3, 1988).Google Scholar
32.Ballard, D.E. and Klappert, W., U.S. Patent No. 4,734,975 (April 5, 1988).Google Scholar
33.Pulle, C., NCEL Report No. CR90.004 (1990).Google Scholar