Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:48:02.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Injection Molding of Polymers and Polymer Composites: Process Modeling and Simulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

K.K. Wang
Get access

Extract

For efficient and economic production of discrete parts with any material, it is always desirable to obtain the final product using one process alone, without secondary operations. This is called “net-shape” manufacturing. Injection molding is perhaps the best net-shape manufacturing process for materials that can be handled by this method. For polymers and some of their composites, injection molding can mass produce high-precision parts with complex geometry at very low cost. In engineering applications, some injection-molded plastic parts of intricate shape with tight tolerance can be snap-fitted together for easy assembly, while others can achieve extremely high quality to meet the optical functional requirements for such parts as optical lenses and information-storage disks.

Since the oil crisis in the early 1970s, the use of polymers as an engineering material has been rapidly increasing to improve energy efficiency for both the processes themselves and the final products. Plastics still constitute one of the world's fastest growing industries. Polymeric materials and their composites offer various desirable properties including high strength-to-weight ratio, corrosion resistance, clarity, and others. Among all the polymer-processing methods, injection molding accounts for approximately one-third by weight of all the polymeric materials processed.

Type
Materials Manufacturing
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , April 1992 , pp. 45 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Rosato, D.V. and Rosato, D.V., Injection Molding Handbook (Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1986).Google Scholar
2.Wang, K.K.et al., Computer-Aided Injection Molding System, Progress Report No. 1, Cornell Injection Molding Program (CIMP), (Cornell University, 1975).Google Scholar
3.Kamal, M.R. and Kenig, S., J. Polym. Eng. Sci. 12 (1972) p. 294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Wales, J.L.S., Van Leeuwen, J., and Van der Vijgh, R., J. Polym. Eng. Sci. 12 (1972) p. 358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Richardson, S., J. Fluid Mech. 56 (1972) p. 609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Menges, G. and Wubken, G., SPE ANTEC (1973) p. 519.Google Scholar
7.Broyer, E., Tadmor, Z., and Gutfinger, C., Israel J. Technology 11 (1973) p. 189.Google Scholar
8.Lord, H.A. and Williams, G., J. Polym. Eng. Sci. 15 (1975) p. 553.Google Scholar
9.White, J.L., J. Polym. Eng. Sci. 15 (1975) p. 44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Kamal, M.R., Kuo, Y., and Doan, P.H., J. Polym. Eng. Sci. 15 (1975) p. 863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Kuo, Y. and Kamal, M.R., AIChE J. 22 (1976) p. 661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Hieber, C.A. and Shen, S.F., J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 7 (1980) p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Wang, V.W., Hieber, C.A., and Wang, K.K., J. Polym. Eng. 7 (1986) p. 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Wang, V.W. and Hieber, C.A., SPE ANTEC (1988) p. 290.Google Scholar
15.Wang, K.K.et al., Computer Aided Injection Molding System, Progress Reports Nos. 1-16, Cornell Injection Molding Program, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (1975–1991).Google Scholar
16.Applications of Computer Aided Engineering in Injection Molding, edited by Manzione, L.T. (Hanser Publishers, Munich-Vienna-New York, 1987).Google Scholar
17.Injection and Compression Molding Fundamentals, edited by Isayev, A.I. (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1987).Google Scholar
18.Hele-Shaw, H.S., Trans. Inst, of Naval Architecture 11 (1989) p. 25.Google Scholar
19.Schlichting, H., Boundary Layer Theory, 6th ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York 1968).Google Scholar
20.Hieber, C.A., Socha, L.S., Shen, S.F., Wang, K.K., and Isayev, A.I., J. Poly. Eng. & Sci. 23 (1983) p. 20–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Spencer, R.S. and Gilmore, C.D., J. Appl. Phys. 20 (1949) p. 502–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Williams, M.L., Landell, R.D., and Ferry, J.D., J. Chem. Soc. 77 (1955) p. 3701–3707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Wang, K.K. and Hieber, C.A., Proc. ASME Interdisciplinary Issues in Materials Processing and Manufacturing 2 (1987) p. 645–660.Google Scholar
24.Leonov, A.I., Rheologica Acta 15 (1976) p. 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Isayev, A.I. and Hieber, C.A., Rheologica Acta 19 (1980) p. 168–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Lee, E.H., Rogers, T.G., and Woo, T.C., J. Ceramic Soc. 48 (1965) p. 480–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Snow, B.D. and Bogue, D.C., J. Rheol. 18 (1984) p. 533–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Kovacs, A.J., “La Contraction Isotherme du Volume des Polymeres Amorphes”, J. Polym. Sci. 30 (1958) p. 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Struik, L.C.E., Physical Aging in Amorphous Polymers and Other Materials (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1978).Google Scholar