Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:52:59.346Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Geometrical Origins of Interfacial Strength

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

M.E. Eberhart ,
D.P. Clougherty  and
J.N. Louwen
Get access

Extract

The advent of new materials processing and fabrication techniques has made it possible to control atomic-scale structure to an extent only dreamed of as recently as 20 years ago. This improved structure control takes us one step closer to synthesizing materials with a combination of properties tailored to the intended application. It is this ability to control structure that will accelerate the pace of technological advancement which is limited by the rate of materials development.

Mechanical performance of materials restricts their use, even for nonstructural applications. Magnetic composites used in recording heads are an example. The mechanical and tribological properties of these materials are a major consideration when designing reliable components.

Another example is electronic materials, where the strength of the interface between the polymer packaging and the semiconductor controls the lifetime of the semiconductor device. The semiconductor device undergoes thermal cycling as it is used, straining the polymer/semiconductor interface. Environmental impurities such as moisture can enter through cracks in the interface and degrade the semiconductor, causing device failure.

Type
Engineered Interfaces in Composites
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , April 1991 , pp. 53 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Briant, C.L., MRS Bulletin Vol. XV (10) (1990) p. 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Freeman, A.J., MRS Bulletin 15 (9) (1990) p. 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Rice, J.R., in Chemistry and Physics of Fracture, edited by Latanision, R.M. and Jones, R.H. (Matinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, 1987) p. 27.Google Scholar
4.Anderson, Peter M., Wang, Jian-Sheng, and Rice, James R., in Innovations in Ultra High Strength Steel Technology, edited by Olson, G.B., Azrin, M., and Wright, E.S. (Proc. 34th Sagamore Conference, 1987) p. 619.Google Scholar
5.Hohenberg, P. and Kohn, W., Phys. Rev. 136 (1964) p. B864; W. Kohn and L.J. Sham, Phys. Rev. A 140 (1965) p. 1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Slater, J.C., Adv. Quantum Chem. 6 (1972) p. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Baerends, E.J., Ellis, D.E., and Ros, P., Chem. Phys. 2 (1973) p. 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Rauk, A. and Ziegler, T., Theo. Chim. Acta 46 (1977) p. 1; L. Versuluis, thesis, University of Calgary, 1989.Google Scholar
9.Hellmann, H., Einführung in die Quantumchemie, Section 54 (1937); R.P. Feynman, Phys. Rev. 56 (1939) p. 340.Google Scholar
10. For instance, Bader, R.F.W. and Essen, H., J. Chem. Phys. 80 (1984) p. 1943 and references within.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Eberhart, M.E., Donovan, M.M., MacLaren, J.M., and Clougherty, D.P., Prog. Surf. Sci. (in press).Google Scholar