Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:46:52.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Degradation of Thermal-Barrier Coatings at Very High Temperatures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

F.H. Stott ,
D.J. de Wet  and
R. Taylor
Get access

Extract

Thermal-barrier coatings are finding increasing use in engineering applications, particularly in gas turbines. Such coatings, consisting of ceramic insulating layers bonded to the superalloy substrate by oxidation-resistant alloy coatings, are deposited onto components to reduce heat flow through the cooled substrate and to limit operating temperature. They have been used effectively on static components such as combustor cans, flare heads, hot gas seal segments, fuel evaporators, and deflector plates, giving considerable improvements in component life. They have been used successfully on vane platforms. In recent years, the emphasis has shifted toward the development of coatings for high-risk areas, such as turbine blades.

A ceramic thermal-barrier coating needs to be refractory and chemically inert, and to have low thermal conductivity. However, it also needs to possess a high thermal expansion coefficient of ~11 × 10−6 K−1, to match the nickel-base superalloy substrate. The latter specification has focused attention on ZrO2. However, ZrO2 is polymorphic and undergoes two phase changes, cubic to tetragonal at 2350°C and tetragonal to monoclinic at 1170°C. The latter transformation is accompanied by a 5% volume increase which means that ZrO2 has to be alloyed to stabilize one of the high-temperature phases. Early systems in the 1970s consisted of ZrO2 stabilized with MgO, but this has been shown to be a metastable system. Present-day commercial thermal-barrier coatings consist of a plasma-sprayed yttria- or magnesiastabilized zirconia layer on top of an M-Cr-Al-Y bond coat. The latter plays a very important role by helping to key the ceramic to the alloy substrate and to accommodate the mechanical strains arising because of differences in thermal expansion coefficients and elastic moduli between the ceramic and the substrate.

Type
Corrosion and Coating
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 19 , Issue 10 , October 1994 , pp. 46 - 49
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Tucker, R.C. Jr., Taylor, T.A., and Weatherly, M.H., Proc. 3rd Conf. on Gas Turbine Materials in the Marine Environment, Bath (MoD (PE) Ship Department, Bath, 1976).Google Scholar
2.Gill, B.J., Proc. 10th Int. Thermal Spraying Conf. (Deutscher Verlag für Schweisstechnik, Düsseldorf, 1983).Google Scholar
3.Rhys-Jones, T.N. and Toriz, F.C., High Temp. Technol. 7 (1989) p. 73.Google Scholar
4.Toriz, F.C., Thakker, A.B., and Gupta, S., Surf. Coating Technol. 39/40 (1989) p. 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Morrell, P., Rolls-Royce pic, private communication (1992).Google Scholar
6.Taylor, R., Brendon, J.R., and Morrell, P., Surf. Coating Technol. 50 (1992) p. 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Nicholls, J.R. and Stephenson, D.J., Met. and Mater. 7 (1991) p. 156.Google Scholar
8.Demaray, R.E., Fairbanks, J.W., and Boone, D.J., J. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. (ASME paper 82-GT-264, 1982).Google Scholar
9.Toriz, F.C., Thakker, A.B., and Gupta, S.K., J. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. (ASME paper 88-GT-279, 1988).Google Scholar
10.de Wet, D.J., Taylor, R., and Stott, F.H., J. Phys. (Paris) IV 3 (1993) p. 655.Google Scholar
11.Stott, F.H., de Wet, D.J., and Taylor, R., in Advances in Syntheses and Processes 3, edited by Froes, F.H., Wallace, W., Cull, R.A., and Stuckholt, E. (Soc. for Advancement of Material and Process Engineering, Covina, CA, 1992) p. 92.Google Scholar
12.Van Vlack, L.H., in Physical Ceramics for Engineers (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1964) p. 62.Google Scholar