Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T12:43:32.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Advances in Scanning Electron Microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

K. Sujata  and
Hamlin M. Jennings
Get access

Extract

Scanning electron microscopes offer several unique advantages and they have evolved into complex integrated instruments that often incorporate several important accessories. Their principle advantage stems from the method of constructing an image from a highly focused electron beam that scans across the surface of a specimen. The beam generates backscattered electrons and excites secondary electrons and x-rays in a highly localized “spot.” These signals can be detected, and the results of the analysis are displayed as a specific intensity on a screen at a position that represents the position of the electron spot. As with a television image, after a given period, information about the entire field of view is displayed on the screen, resulting in a complete image. If the specimen is thin, the same type of information can be gathered from the transmitted electrons, and a scanning transmission image is thus constructed.

The scanning electron microscope is highly versatile and widely used. The quality of the image is related to its resolution and contrast, which, in turn, depend on the diameter of the focused beam as well as its energy and current. Because electron lenses have inherently high aberrations, the usable aperture angles are much smaller than in a light microscope and, therefore, the electron beam remains focused over a relatively large distance, giving these instruments a very large depth of focus.

Scanning electron microscopes are versatile in their ability to detect and analyze a lot of information. As a result, modern versions of these instruments are equipped with a number of detectors. Developments are sometimes related to placing the detectors in a geometrically attractive position close to the specimen.

Type
Imaging in Materials Science
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 16 , Issue 3: Imaging in Materials Science , March 1991 , pp. 41 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Fitzgerald, R., Microprobe Analysis, edited by Andersen, C.A. (John Wiley & Sons, 1973) p. 1–51; A.N. Broers, Microprobe Analysis, edited by C.A. Andersen (John Wiley & Sons, 1973) p. 83-121.Google Scholar
2. McMullan, D., J. Microscopy 155 (Pt. 3) (1989) p. 373–392.Google Scholar
3. Koike, Kazuyuki, Matsuyama, Hideo, and Hayakawa, Kazunobu, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2 (27) (1988) p. L1352–L1354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Unguris, J., Pierce, D.T., and Colleta, R.J., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 57 (1986) p. 1314.Google Scholar
5. Oepen, H.P. and Kirschner, J. (to be published).Google Scholar
6. Reimer, Ludwig, Scanning Electron Microscope 45, edited by Hawkes, Peter (Springer-Verlag, Germany, 1985).Google Scholar
7. Maher, E.F., Scanning 7 (1985) p. 61–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Brown, A.M. and Hill, M.P., J. Microscopy 153 (Pt. 1) (1909) p. 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Danilatos, G.D., Scanning 7 (1) (1985) p. 26–42; 12 (1990) p. 23-27; Adv. Electronics and Electron Phys. 78 (1990) p. 1; 71 (1988) p. 109-250.Google Scholar
10. Baumgarten, Neil, Nature 341 (6237) (Sept. 7, 1989) p. 81–82; Proc. 47th EMSA (1990); American Laboratory (June 1990).Google Scholar
11. Doehne, E. and Stulik, D.C., Scanning Microscopy 4 (2) (1990) p. 275–286.Google Scholar
12. Groves, G.W., in Microstructural Development During Hydration of Cement, edited by Struble, L.J. and Brown, P.W. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 85, Pittsburgh, PA, 1987) p. 13–20; S. Diamond, Microstructural Development During Hydration of Cement, edited by L.J. Struble and P.W. Brown (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 85, Pittsburgh, PA, 1987) p. 21-31.Google Scholar
13. Jennings, H.M., in Advances in Cement Technology, edited by Ghosh, S.N. (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1983) p. 349–396.Google Scholar
14. Jennings, H.M. and Pratt, P.L., J. Mater. Sci. 15 (1980) p. 250–253.Google Scholar
15. Jennings, H.M., Dagleish, B. and Pratt, P.L., J. Amer. Ceram. Soc. 64 (1981) p. 567–572.Google Scholar