Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:43:03.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Substrate Engineering With Plastic Buffer Layers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

The advantage that epitaxy offers the electronics and optoelectronics industries is that it allows the possibility of producing precisely controlled layers of very high crystal quality. Heteroepitaxy of different materials offers the promise of tailoring device layers in clever ways that nature did not intend. However unlike fruit juices, nature has made it difficult to epitaxially combine different materials. As the preceding articles have clearly pointed out, it is very difficult to obtain smooth epitaxial layers that are free both of defects and strain when there is a lattice mismatch between the layers and their substrates.

As already discussed in this issue, a uniform network of dislocations at the interface between a flat, uniform epitaxial layer and its substrate can completely relieve strain in the majority of the epitaxial layer. This would be a satisfactory situation for many devices so long as the active region of the device could be kept away from the interface. The problem is how to introduce the dislocations in an appropriate way. When an epitaxial layer has a larger lattice parameter than the underlying substrate, a misfit dislocation running along the interface represents a plane of atoms that has been removed from the epitaxial layer. (One would insert a plane of atoms if the epitaxial lattice parameter was smaller. For simplicity however we will continue to assume that the epitaxial layer has a larger lattice parameter.) It is not possible for a whole half plane of atoms, bounded by the dislocation at the interface and the substrate edges along the two sides, to be removed at once. The boundary between where the extra plane of atoms has been removed and where the epitaxial layer has not relaxed yet will represent a threading dislocation. This threading dislocation would continue to move as the size of the misfit dislocation along the interface grows. Ideally it moves all the way out to the substrate edge and vanishes there while the misfit dislocation along the interface would end up extending from one side of the substrate to the other. However other dislocations and other kinds of defects can effectively pin the threading dislocation resulting in an epitaxial layer with many threading dislocations. Unfortunately these threading dislocations are generally detrimental to most kinds of devices. It is precisely this high density of threading dislocations that limits applications of many heteroepitaxial layers.

Type
Heteroepitaxy and Strain
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. This will be true so long as the epitaxial layer is much thicker than the typical spacing between the dislocations in the network.Google Scholar
2. This is the simplest situation. Other kinds of defects, which are generally more harmful to device performance, are also possible.Google Scholar
3. See Schowalter, L.J. and Fathauer, R.W., CRC Critical Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 15 (1989) p. 376; and References therein for a review of the epitaxial growth of fluorides on semiconductors.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Schowalter, L.J., Fathauer, R.W., Ponce, F.A., Anderson, G., and Hashimoto, S., in Heteroepitaxy on Silicon, edited by Fan, J.C.C. and Poate, J.M. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 67, Pittsburgh, 1986) p. 125.Google Scholar
5.Schowalter, L.J., Ayers, J.E., Ghandhi, S.K., Hashimoto, S., Gibson, W.M., LeGoues, F.K., and Claxton, P.A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 8 (1990) p. 246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Schowalter, L.J. and Li, W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 62 (7) (1993) p. 696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Matthews, J.W., in Materials Science Series: Epitaxial Growth, Part B, edited by Matthews, J.W. (Academic Press, New York, 1975) p. 559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Fox, B.A. and Jesser, W.A., J. Appl. Phys. 68 (1990) p. 2801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Farrow, R.F.C., Sullivan, P.W., Williams, G.M., Jones, G.R., and Cameron, D.C., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 19 (1981) p. 415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Schowalter, L.J., Fathauer, R.W., Goehner, R.P., Turner, L.G., DeBlois, R.W., Hashimoto, S., Peng, J-L., Gibson, W.M., and Krusius, J.P., J. Appl. Phys. 58 (1985) p. 302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Zogg, H., Appl. Phys. Lett. 49 (1986) p. 933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Li, W., Hymes, S., Murarka, S.P., and Schowalter, L.J. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 308, Pittsburgh, 1993) p. 451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Touloukian, Y.S., Kirby, R.K., Taylor, R.E., and Desai, P.D., Thermophysical Properties of Matter, Vol. 12: Thermal Expansion, Metallic Elements and Alloys (Plenum, New York, 1975).Google Scholar
14.Touloukian, Y.S., Kirby, R.K., Taylor, R.E., and Lee, T.Y.R., Thermophysical Properties of Matter, Vol. 13: Thermal Expansion, Nonmetallic Solids (Plenum, New York, 1977).Google Scholar
15.Lee, H.C., Asano, T., Ishiwara, H., and Furukawa, S., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 27 (1988) p. 1616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Mizukami, H., Tsutsui, K., and Furukawa, S., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 30 (1991) p. 3349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Li, W., Anan, T., and Schowalter, L.J., J. Crysi. Growth 135 (1994) p. 78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Chu, T.K., Huber, C., Santiago, F., Martinez, A., Zogg, H., Blunier, S., Maissen, C., Taylor, A.P., and Schowalter, L.J., in Heteroepitaxy of Dissimilar Materials, edited by Farrow, R.F.C., Harbison, J.P., Peercy, P.S., and Zangwill, A. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 221, Pittsburgh, 1991) p. 483.Google Scholar
19.Izumi, A., Tsutsui, K., and Furukawa, S., Extended Abstracts of the International Conference on Solid State Devices and Materials (Makhan, Japan, 1993) p. 306.Google Scholar
20.Li, W., Anan, T., and Schowalter, L.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 65 (1994) p. 595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Li, W., Thundat, T., Anan, T., and Schowalter, L.J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 13 (2) (1995) p. 670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Romano, L.T., Bringans, R.D., Zhou, X., and Kirk, W.P., Phys. Rev. B 52 (1995) p. 11201; L.T. Romano, J. Knall, R.D. Bringans, and D.K. Biegelsen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 65 (1994) p. 869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Powell, A.R., Iyer, S.S., and LeGoues, F.K., Phys. Rev. B 64 (14) (1994) p. 1856.Google Scholar
24.Yang, Z., Guarin, F., Tao, I.W., Wang, W.I., and Iyer, S.S., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 13 (2) (1995) p. 789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar