Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:10:01.823Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Progress in the Development of a Mechanical Properties Microprobe*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

W. C. Oliver
W. C. Oliver*
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Get access

Extract

A mechanical properties microprobe is an exciting concept. A system with the ability to evaluate the mechanical response of a sample with submicron spacial resolution would have an extremely wide range of applications. Recent developments in hardware and understanding have placed this goal within our grasp.

In 1971, J.J.Gilman wrote the following in his article, “Hardness—A Strength Microprobe”:

“Hardness measurements are at once among the most maligned and the most magnificent of physical measurements. Maligned because they are often misinterpreted by the uninitiated, and magnificent because they are so efficient in generating information for the skilled practitioner. They can quickly yield quantitative information about the elastic, anelastic, plastic, viscous, and fracture properties of a great variety of both isotropic and anisotropic solids. The tools that are used are simple and the sample sizes that are needed are typically small, sometimes submicroscopic. This makes it unnecessary to have large specimens in order to measure strength properties and makes it possible to measure the properties of various microscopic particles within the matrix phase of a polyphase metal, mineral, or ceramic material. This is why hardness may be considered to be a strength microprobe.”

These statements are worth repeating for two reasons. First, they point out the largely untapped potential for microin-dentation tests to improve our understanding of the mechanical properties of materials. Second, it is the first mention of hardness tests in the context of a strength microprobe. In this article the more general term of microindentation tests will be used, since hardness is only one of many properties that can be measured with such tests. In addition, the term mechanical properties microprobe (MPM) will be used rather than strength microprobe-again, to note the wide variety of properties that can be measured.

Type
Technical Features
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 11 , Issue 5 , October 1986 , pp. 15 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Research sponsored by the Division of Materials Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-S4ORZ1400 with Martin Marietta Energy Systems, Inc.

References

1.Gilman, J.J., The Science of Hardness and It's Research Applications, edited by Westbrook, J.H. and Conrad, H. (American Society for Metals, 1973), p. 51–72.Google Scholar
2.Tabor, D., The Hardness of Metals (Oxford at the Clarendon Press, 1951).Google Scholar
3.Westbrook, J.H., in ASTM proceedings, 1957, 57, p. 873.Google Scholar
4.Chu, S.N.G. and Li, J.C.M., J. Mater. Sci., 12 (1977) p. 2200–2208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Chu, S.N.G. and Li, J.C.M., J. Mater. Sci. and Eng., 45 (1980) p. 167–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Bulychev, S.I., Alekhin, V.P., Shorshorov, M.K.H., Ternovskii, A.P., and Shnyrev, G.D., Zayod. Labor., 41, 9 (1975).Google Scholar
7.Lawn, B.R. and Wilshaw, T.R., Fracture of Brittle Solids (Cambridge University Press, England, 1975).Google Scholar
8.Lawn, B.R. and Evans, A.G., J. Mater. Sci., 12 (1977) p. 2195–2199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Li, J.C.M. and Chu, S.N.G., Scr. Metall., 13 (1979) p. 1021–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Westwood, A.R.C. and Macmillan, N.H., The Science of Hardness Testing and Its Research Applications, edite d by Westbrook, J.H. and Conrad, H. (American Society for Metals, 1973), p. 377–417.Google Scholar
11.Pethica, J.B., Hutchings, R., and Oliver, W.C., Phil. Mag. A., 48, No. 4 (1983) p. 593–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Oliver, W.C., Hutchings, R., and Pethica, J.B., Microindentation Techniques in Materials Science, edited by Blau, and Lawn, , ASTM Special Technical Publication No. 889 (1986).Google Scholar
13.Doerner, M.F. and Nix, W.D., J. Mater. Res. (in press, August 1986).Google Scholar
14. Forfurther information contact : Micro-science, Inc., Forbes Business Center, 182 Forbes Road, Braintree, MA 02184; telephone (617) 849-1952.Google Scholar
15.Oliver, W.C., Wadsworth, J., and Nieh, T.G., “Characterization of Rapidly Solidified Al-Be and Al-Be-Li Ribbons” (to be published in MRS proceedings, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.David, S.A., Oliver, W.C., Keiser, J.R. (to be published in Welding Journal).Google Scholar
17.Zinkle, S. and Oliver, W.C., “Mechanical Property Measurements on Ion-Irradiated Copper and Cu-Zr,” J. Nucl. Mater, (in press, 1986).Google Scholar