Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:36:39.880Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Need for Microstructural Measurement Techniques in the Study of Cosmetic Product Properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

P. G. Cummins  and
C. Fthenakis
Get access

Abstract

A cosmetic product is often a complex non-homogeneous mixture of physicochemical units including polymers, small molecules, surface-active species, and particles. In use, it is applied to an equally heterogeneous substrate, skin. Consequently, materials structure as well as composition and the nature of the surfaces are relevant to a clear understanding of any technologically important product property or process. No longer is it sufficient to answer the classical questions of analysis—what and how much?—for many applications; we must now ask the additional questions of where, how organized, and how is it manifest to the customer? Although analytical sciences have, for many years, been applied to the problem of characterizing what is in chemical systems, the need to understand spatial and interfacial interactions has received much less attention. The explosive growth, however, in electronics, computing, biology, mathematical methodologies, microscopy, and optics now present the cosmetic industry with a new set of tools that can be utilized to address this issue. It is the objective of this article to highlight some of these measurement advances and how they might have relevance in the cosmetics industry in the coming years.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 32 , Issue 10: The Materials Science of Cosmetics , October 2007 , pp. 793 - 800
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Egelstaff, P.A., An Introduction to the Liquid State (Atomic Energy Research Establishment, Harwell, UK, 1967).Google Scholar
2.Frontiers in Visualization and Human-Computer Interaction, Full Conference 1997: Visualizing the Future of the Life Sciences (The European Bioinformatics Institute, Hinxton, UK, December 10–11, 1997).Google Scholar
3.Schaeberle, M.D., Kalasinsky, V.F., Luke, J.L., Lewis, E.N., Levin, I.W., Treado, P.J., Anal. Chem. 68 (11), 1829 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Mendelsohn, R., Moore, D.J., Chem. Phys. Lipids 96(1–2), 141 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Corcuff, P., Leveque, J.L., Booker, B.E., Dermatology 186, 50 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Rojanski, Y., Paddock, S.W., Robinson, J.R., Int. J. Pharm, 163 (1990).Google Scholar
7.Auty, M.A.E., Twomey, M., Guinee, T.P., Mulvihill, D.M., J. Dairy Res. 68 417 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Kim, J.H., Johannes, L., Goud, B., Antony, C., Lingwood, C.A., Daneman, R., Grinstein, S., Can. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95 (6), 2997 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Vinogradov, S.A., Lo, L.O., Jenkins, W.T., Evans, S.M., Koch, C., Biophys. J. 70 (4), 1609 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Faust, B., Modern Chemical Techniques (Royal Chemical Society/Unilever, London, 1991–1992).Google Scholar
11.Champeney, D.C., Fourier Transforms and their Practical Applications (Academic Press, London, 1973).Google Scholar
12.Zmeskal, O., Vesely, M., Nezadal, M., Buchnicek, M., Harmonic and Fractal Image Anal., 3 (2001).Google Scholar
13.Cashwell, E.D., Everett, C.J., A Practical Manual on The Monte Carlo Method for Random Walk Problems (Pergamon Press, New York, 1959).Google Scholar
14.Purves, D., Lotto, R. Beau, Why We See What We Do (An Empirical Theory of Vision) (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, 2003).Google Scholar
15. R Mendlesohn, private communications.Google Scholar
16. Unpublished private results obtained from a demonstration of River Diagnostics Raman instrument on the forearm.Google Scholar
17.Melessanaki, K., Papadakis, V., Bala, C., Anglos, D.. Spectrochim. Acta B, At. Spectrosc. 56 (12), 2337 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Brown, N., Peng, J., Jackson, M.R., Parkin, R.M., Opt. Laser Technol. 33 (2), 103 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Morgan, R.L., Hill, M.J., Barham, P.J., Van de Pol, A., Kip, B.J., Ottjes, R., Van Ruiten, J., Polymer 42 (5), 2121 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.McGuire, M., Jallad, K.N., Ben-Amotz, D., Hamers, R.J., Appl. Surf. Sci. 178 (1–4), 105 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Dumas, D., Gaborit, N., Grossin, L., Riquelme, B., Gigant-Huselstein, C., de Isla, N., Gillet, P., Netter, P., Stoltz, J.F., Biorheology 41 (3–4), 459 (2004).Google Scholar
22.Zhang, L., Henson, M.J., Selulic, S.S., Anal. Chim. Acta 545 (2), 262 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Carlsohn, M.F., Real Time Imaging 11 (2), 17 (2005); M.F. Carlsohn, Real Time Imaging 9 (4), 299 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Schlager, K.J., Ruchti, T.L., Proc. SPIE 2386, 208 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Mazerolles, G., Hanafi, M., Dufour, E., Bertrand, D., Qannari, E.M., Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst. 81 (1), 41 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Brody, H., Edwards, H.G.M., Pollard, A.M., Anal. Chim. Acta 427 (2), 223 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Adrian, M., Dubochet, J., Lepault, J., McDowall, A.W., Nature 308, 32 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Lawrence, J.R., Korber, D.R., Caldwell, D.E., J. Microbiol. Meth. 10 (2), 123 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Patzelt, W.J., Leitz, E., Polarized Light Microscope: Principles, Instruments, and Applications (Wetzlar, 1974).Google Scholar
30.Jenkins, F.A., White, H.E., Fundamentals of Optics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1957).Google Scholar
31.Inoue, S., J. Cell Biol. 89, 346 (May 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.Karnaky, K.J., Garretson, L.T., O'Neil, R.G., J. Morphol. 213 (1), 21 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Gundersen, S.A., Saether, O., Sjoblom, J., Colloids Surf. A 186 (3), 141 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.Saether, O., Sjoblom, J., Verbich, S.V., Mishchuk, N.A., Colloids Surf. A 142 (2–3), 189 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Pluta, M., Advanced Light Microscopy (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1993).Google Scholar
36.Astner, S., Gonzalez, E., Cheung, A., Ruis-Diaz, F., Gonzalez, S., J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 3 (6), 986 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Swindells, K., Burnett, N., Ruiz-Diaz, F., Gonzalez, E., Mihm, M.C., Gonzalez, S., J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 50 (2), 220 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.Myhra, S., Biosens. Bioelectron. 19 (11), 1345 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39.Golubev, A., J. Cryst. Growth 275 (1–2), 2357 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40.Wang, H., Djurisic, A.B., Chan, W.K., Xie, M.H., Appl. Surf. Sci. 252 (4), 1092 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41.Lei, C.H., Ouzineb, K., Dupont, O., Keddie, J.L., J. Colloid Interface Sci. 307, 56 (March 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42.Bard, A.J., Denusult, G., Friesner, R.A., Dornblaser, B.C., Tuckerman, L.S., Anal. Chem. 63, 1282 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43.Cordero, S.R., Weston, K.D., Buratto, S.K., Thin Solid Films 360 (1–2), 139 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44.Paule, E., Reineker, P., J. Luminescence 94–95, 153 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45.Flanders, B.R., Dunn, R.C., Ultramicroscopy 91 (1–4), 245 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46.Linder, P., Zemb, T., Eds., Neutron, X-Ray and Light Scattering: Introduction to an Investigative Tool for Colloidal and Polymeric Systems (North-Holland, 1991).Google Scholar
47.Penfold, J., Richardson, R.M., Zarbakhsh, A., Webster, J.R.P., Bucknall, D.G., Rennie, A.R., Jones, R.A.L., Cosgrove, T., Thomas, R.K., Higgins, J.S., Fletcher, P.D.I., Dickinson, E., Roser, S.J., McLure, I.A., Hillman, A.R., Richards, R.W., Staples, E.J., Burgess, A.N., Simister, E.A., White, J.W., J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 93, 3899 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48.Pecora, R., Ed., Dynamic Light Scattering: Applications of Photon Correlation Spectroscopy (Springer, New York, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar