Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:43:23.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Materials Science of Radioactive Waste Forms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

The materials science of radioactive waste forms and containment materials has long been a subject of interest to the Materials Research Society. One of the earliest (and continuing) MRS symposia, the Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, has been held 18 times since 1978. This symposium rotates abroad every third year: Berlin in 1982, Stockholm in 1985, Berlin in 1988, Strasbourg in 1991, and Kyoto this past October. Nearly 170 papers were presented at the Kyoto meeting.

Materials science issues for nuclear waste disposal are unique in their scale and consequences. The wastes include an extremely wide variety of materials: spent nuclear fuel from commercial and research reactors; high-level liquid waste produced at West Valley, New York, during the reprocessing of commercial spent nuclear fuel; high-level waste (HLW) generated by the nuclear weapons program; nearly pure plutonium from the dismantling of nuclear weapons; highly enriched uranium from weapons; low-level, medium-level, and mixed waste from laboratories and medical facilities; and, finally, mill tailings from uranium mines and the residues from chemical processing, such as the radium-bearing filtrate presently in storage at Fernald, Ohio, and Niagara Falls, New York. Some material can be simply stabilized and monitored in situ, as is done for most uranium mill tailings and residues, but other materials require retrieval, processing, immobilization, and permanent disposal. The volumes of material that will require handling, immobilization, and disposal are enormous. In the United States, much of the weapons program waste is stored in tanks at Hanford, Washington and Savannah River, South Carolina.

Type
Nuclear Waste Disposal
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Illman, D.L., “Researchers Take Up Environmental Challenge at Hanford,” Chemical & Engineering News 71 (25) (1993) p. 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Defense Waste Processing Facility-Cost, Schedule, and Technical Issues, GAO/RCED-92-183 (General Accounting Office, Washington, DC, 1992) 62 pages.Google Scholar
3.Complex Cleanup, The Environmental Legacy of Nuclear Weapons Production, OTA-0-484 (Congress of the United States, Washington, DC, 1991) 212 pages.Google Scholar
4.Management and Disposition of Excess Weapons Plutonium (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1994) 31 pages.Google Scholar
5.Weber, W.J. and Ewing, R.C., Radiation Effects Issues Related to U.S. DOE Site Remediation and Nuclear Waste Storage, in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, edited by Murakami, T. and Ewing, R.C. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. of the Materials Research Society) (in press).Google Scholar
6.Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future, edited by Lutze, W. and Ewing, R.C. (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988) 778 pages.Google Scholar
7. Thematic Issue on Nuclear Waste, edited by Ewing, R.C., J. Nucl. Mater. 190 (1992) 347 pages.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Storck, R., Aschenbach, J., Hirekorn, R.P., Nies, A., and Stelte, N., Performance Assessment of Geological Isolation Systems for Radioactive Waste (PAGIS): Disposal in Salt Formations, EUR 11778 EN, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels-Luxembourg (1991).Google Scholar
9.Oreskes, N., Shrader-Frechette, K., and Belitze, K., “Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences,” Science 263 (1994) p. 641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10.Chapman, N., “Natural Analogues: The State of Play in 1992,” in Proc. Third Int. Conf. on High-level Radioactive Waste Management, edited by Tulenko, J.S. (American Nuclear Society, 1992) p. 1695.Google Scholar
11.Ewing, R.C., “The Role of Natural Analogues in Performance Assessment: Applications and Limitations,” in Proc. Third Int. Conf on High Level Radioactive Waste Management, edited by Tulenko, J.S. (American Nuclear Society, 1992) p. 1429.Google Scholar