Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:09:44.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Material Matters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Udo Pagga
Get access

Extract

In many European countries the controlled biological treatment of organic solid waste is a suitable method in waste management. Technical prerequisites such as collection and separation systems for household waste often exist and sufficient treatment facilities for controlled aerobic composting or even anaerobic digestion are available. Space for landfill is scarce and therefore expensive in many industrial countries and biotreatment is much cheaper than incineration. The advantage of composting compared to other waste treatment techniques is not only the relatively low costs but also the technical reasons. An obvious example is the direct disposal of packaging with alimentary residues and the subsequent biological treatment. Not only green waste from gardens or biowaste from kitchens can be treated, but any compostable material is in principle suitable, for example waste from the food industry or packaging and packaging materials made from paper, cardboard, wood, or biodegradable plastics. Biological treatment has already become a good way of meeting, for example, Germany legislative targets to reduce and recycle garbage.

Prerequisites for controlled biological treatment are suitable technical facilities plus standards and directives for waste management. An example is the European packaging directive which harmonizes national measures concerning the management of packaging and packaging waste. The aim is to prevent any impact of the use of packaging on the environment or to reduce such an impact. For applying this directive and any similar regulations, it is important to have clear definitions, standardized test methods, and suitable evaluation criteria to identify biodegradable packaging materials and to differentiate compostable from noncompostable packaging materials which can commonly be used and the results of which are accepted by all parties concerned.

Type
Material Matters
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 22 , Issue 11 , November 1997 , pp. 5 - 7
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. European Packaging Directive: Directive 94/62/EC of the European Parliament and the Council on Packaging and Packaging Waste, European Union (1994).Google Scholar
2.Pagga, U., J. Polymer Degradation and Stability, accepted for publication.Google Scholar
3. International Standard ISO—Evaluation of the Compostability and Biological Treatability of Plastics—Test Scheme for Final Acceptance. Document N 5026 of ISO TC61 (Draft 1997).Google Scholar
4. European Standard CEN—Requirements for Packaging Recoverable in the Form of Composting and Biodegradation—Test Scheme and Evaluation Criteria for the Final Acceptance of Packaging (Draft 1997).Google Scholar
5. German Standard DIN—Testing of the Compostability of Polymeric Materials—DIN 54900 (Draft 1997).Google Scholar
6. International Standard ISO 14855—Evaluation of the Ultimate Aerobic Biodegradability and Disintegration of Plastics under Controlled Composting Conditions—Method by Analysis of Released Carbon Dioxide (Draft 1996).Google Scholar
7.Pagga, U., Beimborn, D.B., Boelens, J., and De Wilde, B., Chemosphere 31 (1995) p. 4475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.De Baere, L., De Wilde, B., and Tillinger, R., in Studies in Polymer Science: Biodegradable Plastics and Polymers, by Doi, Y. and Fukuda, K. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1994) p. 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Tosin, M., Degli-Innocenti, F., and Bastioli, C., J. of Environm. Polymer Degr. 4 (1996) p. 55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. International Standard ISO 15462—Water Quality—Selection of Tests for Biodegradability (Technical Report) (Draft 1997).Google Scholar
11.Pagga, U., Beimborn, D.B., and Yamamot, M., J. of Environm. Polymer Degr. 4 (1996) p. 173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Itävaara, M. and Vikman, M., J. of Environm. Polymer Degr. 4 (1996) p. 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. International Standard ISO 14851—Evaluation of the Ultimate Aerobic Biodegrada-bility of Plastic Materials in an Aqueous Medium—Method by Determining the Oxygen Demand in a Closed Respirometer (Draft 1996).Google Scholar
14.Püchner, P., Mueller, W.R., and Bardtke, D. D. J. of Environm. Polymer Degr. 3 (1995) p. 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. International Standard ISO 14852—Evaluation of the Ultimate Aerobic Biodegradability of Plastic Materials in an Aqueous Medium - Method by Analysis of Released Carbon Dioxide (Draft 1996).Google Scholar
16.Urstadt, S., Augusta, J., Müller, R.J., and Deckwer, W.D., J. of Environm. Polymer Degr. 3 (1995) p. 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar