Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:27:05.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environmental Effects on the Cracking of Engineering Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

David B. Kasul  and
Lloyd A. Heldt
Get access

Extract

A material's susceptibility to cracking may be significantly affected by its chemical environment. Stress corrosion cracking (SCC), liquid metal embrittle-ment (LME), hydrogen embrittlement (HE), and corrosion fatigue are examples of environmental effects which cause ductility or endurance losses through environment-assisted cracking (EAC). Under certain conditions, virtually all commercially important materials are susceptible to one or more of the above embrittlement processes. Cracking may occur intergranularly, transgranularly, or in a mixed mode, depending on conditions. Much is known about the metallurgical and environmental conditions which promote environment-assisted cracking, and prudent control of these is often successful in mitigating or preventing cracking. However, in spite of our understanding of the factors controlling SCC, LME, and HE, the responsible mechanisms remain elusive.

This article will (1) review some of the important variables affecting these phenomena, such as stress, stress intensity, material microstructure, strain rate, electrochemical potential and pH, and (2) attempt to relate phenomeno-logical characteristics of environment-induced embrittlement to several mechanisms proposed for environment-assisted cracking, as they are understood today.

The problem of stress corrosion cracking is unquestionably the most costly of environmental cracking phenomena, with losses occurring in a wide variety of service environments. Liquid metal embrittlement is of concern in nuclear power and other industries. Hydrogen embrittlement, first recognized as an embrittler of iron in 1873, causes cracking problems in applications ranging from welding to oil drilling. In all, the list of situations in which environment-assisted cracking occurs is long and is likely to grow as materials are increasingly challenged by the severity of their service conditions.

Type
Crack Formation and Propagation
Information
MRS Bulletin , Volume 14 , Issue 8 , August 1989 , pp. 37 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Johnson, W.H., Iron 1 (1873) p. 291.Google Scholar
2.Speidel, M.O., in The Theory of Stress Corrosion Cracking in Alloys, edited by Scully, J.C. (NATO, Brussels, Belgium, 1971) p. 289.Google Scholar
3.Funkenbusch, A.W., Heidt, L.A., and Stein, D.F., in Embrittlement by Liquid and Solid Metals, edited by Kamdar, M.H. (TMS-AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1984) p. 241.Google Scholar
4.Pickering, H.W. and Swann, P.R., Corrosion-NACE 19 (1963) p. 373t.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Jani, S.C., Marek, M., Hochman, R.F., and Meletis, E.I., to be published in Environment Induced Cracking of Metals, edited by Gangloff, R.P. (NACE, Houston, TX, 1989).Google Scholar
6.Hänninen, H., Hakkarainen, T., and Nenonen, P., in Hydrogen Effects in Metals, edited by Bernstein, I.M. and Thompson, A.W. (TMS-AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1981) p. 575.Google Scholar
7.Balaguer, J., Duquette, D.J., Stoloff, N.S., Sikora, B., and Motyl, M., to be published in Met. Trans. A.Google Scholar
8.Adamson, M.G., Reineking, W.H., Vaidyanathan, S., and Lauritzin, T., in Embrittlement by Liquid and Solid Metals, edited by Kamdar, M.H. (TMS-AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1984) p. 523.Google Scholar
9.Price, C.E. and Fredell, R.S., Met. Trans. 17A (1986) p. 889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Newberg, R. and Uhlig, H., J. Electrochem. Soc. 120 (1973) p. 1692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Ives, M.B. and Gangloff, R.P., J. Metals 41 (1989) p. 9.Google Scholar
12.Dix, E., Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Eng., 137 (1940) p. 11.Google Scholar
13.Champion, F.A., Symposium on Internal Stresses in Metals and Alloys (Inst, of Metals, London, England, 1948) p. 468.Google Scholar
14.Logan, H.L., J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 48 (1952) p. 99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Beachem, C.D., Met. Trans. 3 (1972) p. 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Lynch, S.P., J. Mater. Sci. 20 (1985) p. 3329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Lynch, S.P., Corros. Sci. 22 (1982) p. 925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Lynch, S.P., in Hydrogen Effects in Metals, edited by Bernstein, I.M. and Thompson, A.W. (TMS-AIME, Warrendale, PA, 1981) p. 863.Google Scholar
19.Lynch, S.P., J. Mater. Sci. 21 (1986) p. 692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Lynch, S.P., Dept. of Defence, Defence Science and Technology Organisation Aeronautical Research Laboratories, Aircraft Materials Report 119 (Commonwealth of Australia, 1986).Google Scholar
21.Kamachi, K., Otsu, T., and Obayashi, S., Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met. 35 (1971) p. 64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Yazici, R.M., PhD thesis, Rutgers University, 1982.Google Scholar
23.Kramer, I.R., Wu, B., and CFeng, R., Mater. Sci. and Eng. 82 (1986) p. 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Kaufman, M.J. and Fink, J.L., Acta Metall. 36 (1988) p. 2213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Popovich, V.V., Fiz.-Khim. Mekh. Materialov 15 (5) (1979) p. 11 [Sov. Mater. Sci. 14 (5) (1979) p. 438].Google Scholar
26.Popovich, V.V. and Dmukhovskaya, I.G., Fiz.-Khim. Mekh. Materialov 14 (4) (1978) p. 30 [Sov. Mater. Sci. 14 (4) (1978) p. 365].Google Scholar
27.Kimura, H. and Matsui, H., Scripta Metall. 21 (1987) p. 319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Watson, J.W., Shen, Y.Z., and Meshii, M., Met. Trans. 19A (1988) p. 2299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29.Tabata, T. and Birnbaum, H.K., Scripta Metall. 18 (1984) p. 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Robertson, I.M. and Birnbaum, H.K., Acta Metall. 34 (3) (1986) p. 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Forty, A.J. and Humble, P., Philos. Mag. 8 (1963) p. 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32.McEvily, A.J. Jr., and Bond, A.P., J. Electrochem. Soc. 112 (2) (1965) p. 131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Pinchback, T.R., Clough, S.P., and Heidt, L.A., Met. Trans. 6A (1975) p. 1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.Forty, A.J., in Physical Metallurgy of Stress Corrosion Cracking, edited by Rhodin, T.N. (Interscience, 1959) p. 99.Google Scholar
35.Sieradzki, K. and Newman, R.C., Philos. Mag. 51A (1985) p. 95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36.Paskin, A., Sieradzki, K., Som, D.K., and Dienes, G.J., Acta Metall. 31 (1983) p. 1253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Pugh, E.N., Craig, J.V., and Montague, W.G., Trans. ASM 61 (1968) p. 468.Google Scholar
38.Beggs, D.V., Hahn, M.T., and Pugh, E.N., in A.R. Troiano Honorary Symposium on Hydrogen Embrittlement and Stress-Corrosion Cracking, edited by Gibala, R. and Hehemann, R.F. (ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1984) p. 181.Google Scholar
39.Sieradzki, K., Kim, J.S., Cole, A.T., and Newman, R.C., J. Electrochem. Soc. 134 (1987) p. 1635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40.Hintz, M.B., Heidt, L.A., and Koss, D.A., in Embrittlement by the Localized Crack Environment, edited by Gangloff, R.P. (TMS-AIME, New York, 1984) p. 229.Google Scholar
41.Hintz, M.B., Blanchard, W.K., Brindley, P.K., and Heidt, L.A., Met. Trans. 17A (1986) p. 1801.Google Scholar
42.Gahr, S., Grassbech, M.L., and Birnbaum, H.K., Acta Metall. 25 (1977) p. 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43.Ohr, S.M., Scripta Metall. 21 (1987) p. 1681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44.Lin, I-H. and Thompson, R., Acta Metall. 34 (1986) p. 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45.Gerberich, W.W. and Chen, S.H., to be published in Environment Induced Cracking of Metals, edited by Gangloff, R.P. (NACE, Houston, TX, 1989).Google Scholar