Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:28:07.734Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Eggshell Mineralization: A Case Study of a Bioprocessing Strategy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2013

Get access

Extract

Product Concept: Fluid packaging device.

Description: A package is required to contain approximately 50 ml (55–60 grams) of a viscous, 2-phase, thermally labile, aqueous medium containing proteins, carbohydrates, salts, nucleic acids and fats. A seamless ellipsoidal container is anticipated having a maximum radial dimension of 45 mm and a maximum axial dimension of 60 mm. The container wall must be permeable to respiratory gases and water vapor. External surface texture must be minimal. White coloration is acceptable, but the ability to incorporate solid or patterned surface coloration is desirable. The package wall must weigh approximately 5 g, the material must contain at least 0.3 g of bioavailable calcium, and it must be recyclable and biodegradable. The container must withstand 400-g drop test impacts.

Processing: All materials must be maintained and the container fabricated by aseptic processing in neutral-pH, aqueous medium at less than 40°C and with a unit production time of less than 24 hours.

Unit cost: Filled unit containers must be produced for approximately $4.00/100 units, with approximately $1.00/100 units allocated to container components and assembly.

Laboratory Solution: Not achievable in the laboratory.

Biological Solution: The eggshell.

In its composition, architecture, and function, the eggshell is an elegant solution to the design problem posed above—a multilayered bioceramic composite, consisting of a mineral phase (primarily calcite, CaCO3) deposited on and within a complex organic phase (the matrix). The eggshell provides a unique microenvironment for housing embryonic development. It protects the embryo, regulates respiratory gases, water and ions, and provides calcium for embryonic skeletal development.

Type
Biology and Materials Synthesis
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Romanoff, A.L. and Romanoff, A.J., The Avian Egg (Wiley and Sons, New York, 1949).Google Scholar
2.Tyler, C., Wilhelm von Nathusius. On Avian Eggshells. A Translated and Edited Version of His Work (University of Reading, Reading, England, 1964).Google Scholar
3.Solomon, S.E., in Physiology and Biochemistry of the Domestic Fowl, Vol. 4, edited by Freeman, B.M. (Academic Press, New York, 1983) p. 379419.Google Scholar
4.Robinson, D.S. and King, N.R., Nature 199 (1963) p. 497498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Dieckert, J.W., Dieckert, M.C., and Creger, C.R., Poultry Science 68 (1989) p. 15691584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Wong, M., Hendrix, M.J.C., von der Mark, K., Little, C., and Stern, R., Developmental Biology 104 (1984) p. 2836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Arias, J.L., Fernandez, M.S., Dennis, J.E., and Caplan, A.I., Matrix 11 (1991) p. 313320; Connective Tissue Res. 26 (1991) p. 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Wu, T.M., Arias, J., Fink, D.J., Caplan, A.I., and Heuer, A.H., to be published.Google Scholar
9.Rodriguez, J.P., Arias, J., Wu, T.M., Agarwal, M., Xiao, S.-Q., Fink, D.J., Caplan, A.I., and Heuer, A.H., to be published.Google Scholar
10.Quintana, C. and Sandoz, D., Calcified Tissue Res. 25 (1978) p. 145159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Xiao, S.-Q., Baden, S., and Heuer, A.H., to be published.Google Scholar
12.Silyn-Roberts, H. and Sharp, R.M., Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B227 (1986) p. 303324.Google Scholar
13.Long, B.R. and Wilshaw, T.R., Fracture of Brittle Solids (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1975) p. 100.Google Scholar
14.Terepka, A.R., Exper. Cell Res. 30 (1963) p. 11171182; 30 (1963) p. 183–192.Google Scholar
15.Wu, T-M., Fink, D.J., Arias, J.L., Rodriguez, J.P., Heuer, A.H., and Caplan, A.I., in Chemistry and Biology of Mineralized Tissues, edited by Slavkin, H.C. and Price, P. (Elsevier, New York, in press).Google Scholar
16.Schwartz, S., Stephenson, B.D., Sarkar, D.H., and Bracko, R., Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 244 (1975) p. 570590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Kennedy, G.Y. and Vevers, H.G., Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 55B (1976) p. 117123.Google Scholar
18.Salevsky, E. Jr. and Leach, R.M. Jr., Poultry Sci. 59 (1980) p. 438443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Creger, C.R., Phillips, H., and Scott, J.T., Poultry Sci. 55 (1976) p. 17171723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Stemberger, B.H., Mueller, W.J., and Leach, R.M. Jr., Poultry Sci. 56 (1977) p. 537543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Nys, Y., Rawadzki, J., Gautron, J., and Mills, A.D., Poultry Sci. 70 (1991) p. 12361245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Board, R.G., Biol. Rev. 57 (1982) p. 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Heuer, A.H., Fink, D.J., Laraia, V.J.et al., Science 255 (1992) p. 10981105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar