Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:17:12.667Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transition of Dislocation Glide to Shear Transformation in Shocked Tantalum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2017

Luke L. Hsiung*
Affiliation:
Physical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550-9900, U.S.A.
Geoffrey H. Campbell
Affiliation:
Physical and Life Sciences Directorate, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94550-9900, U.S.A.
*
Get access

Abstract

A TEM study of pure tantalum and tantalum-tungsten alloys explosively shocked at a peak pressure of 30 GPa (strain rate: ∼1 x 104 sec-1) is presented. While no ω (hexagonal) phase was found in shock-recovered pure Ta and Ta-5W that contain mainly a low-energy cellular dislocation structure, shock-induced ω phase was found to form in Ta-10W that contains evenly distributed dislocations with a stored dislocation density higher than 1 x 1012 cm-2. The TEM results clearly reveal that shock-induced α (bcc) → ω (hexagonal) shear transformation occurs when dynamic recovery reactions which lead the formation low-energy cellular dislocation structure become largely suppressed in Ta-10W shocked under dynamic (i.e., high strain-rate and high-pressure) conditions. A novel dislocation-based mechanism is proposed to rationalize the transition of dislocation glide to twinning and/or shear transformation in shock-deformed tantalum. Twinning and/or shear transformation take place as an alternative deformation mechanism to accommodate high-strain-rate straining when the shear stress required for dislocation multiplication exceeds the threshold shear stresses for twinning and/or shear transformation.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Hsiung, L.M. and Lassila, D.H., Acta Mater. 48, 4851 (2000).Google Scholar
Young, D.A., Phase Diagrams of the Elements, (University of California Press, Berkeley 1991).Google Scholar
Yu Tonkov, E., Ponyatovsky, E.G., Phase Transformations of Elements under High Pressure (CRC Press, New York 2005), p. 239.Google Scholar
Cynn, H., Yoo, C.S., Phys. Rev. B 59, 8526 (1999).Google Scholar
Lu, C.-H., Hahn, E.N., Remington, B.A., Maddox, B.R., Bringa, E.M., and Meyers, M.A., Sci. Reports 5, 15064 (2015).Google Scholar
Isbell, W.M., Shock Waves: Measuring the Dynamic Response of Materials (Imperial College Press, London 2005).Google Scholar
Campbell, G.H., Archbold, G.C., Hurricane, O.A., and Miller, P. L., J. of Appl. Phys. 101, 033540 (2007).Google Scholar
Barton, R.T., in Numerical Astrophysics, edited by Centrella, J.M., LeBlanc, J.M., and Bowers, R.L. (Jones and Bartlett, Boston 1985), p. 482.Google Scholar
Zikka, S. K., Vohra, Y. K., and Chidambaram, R., Prog. in Mater. Sci. 27 245 (1982).Google Scholar
Weertman, J., Weertman, J.R., Elementary Dislocation Theory (Oxford University Press, Oxford 1992).Google Scholar
Nadgornyi, E.M., Prog. in Mater. Sci. 31, 1 (1988).Google Scholar