Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:43:23.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Spent Fuel Leaching in the Presence of Corroding Iron

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2017

Anders Puranen*
Affiliation:
Hot Cell Laboratory Studsvik Nuclear, Nyköping Sweden.
Alexandre Barreiro
Affiliation:
Hot Cell Laboratory Studsvik Nuclear, Nyköping Sweden.
Lena Z. Evins
Affiliation:
The Swedish Nuclear Fuel Waste Management Company, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kastriot Spahiu
Affiliation:
The Swedish Nuclear Fuel Waste Management Company, Stockholm, Sweden.
*
Get access

Abstract

The Swedish spent nuclear fuel canister design KBS-3 consists of a cylindrical copper shell surrounding an iron insert that holds the spent fuel. Like in most other canister designs the mass of iron constitutes the majority of the canister weight. In order for groundwater to access the spent fuel in a future repository the copper shell must fail and iron corrosion occur. Spent nuclear fuel dissolution will therefor likely proceed under conditions of simultaneous anoxic iron corrosion. The iron corrosion can likely suppress the spent fuel release by creation of strongly reducing conditions from Fe(II) formation and the generation of large quantities of hydrogen. Redox sensitive radionuclides may either be reductively precipitated by dissolved Fe(II) or from interaction with iron corrosion products such a magnetite or green rusts. The generated hydrogen (up to several MPa) may also inhibit the spent nuclear fuel dissolution at the surface of the fuel via the so called hydrogen effect. In order to probe these effects an autoclave experiment was performed in which a basket with PWR spent nuclear fuel (burnup ∼43 MWd/kgU) was suspended in an autoclave containing a simplified groundwater (10 mM NaCl, 2 mM NaHCO3) with iron powder. The autoclave was sparged and pressurized with argon. Following an initial rise in radionuclide concentrations from dissolution of pre-oxidised phases the U concentration dropped to 3x10-9 M within 76 days, in-line with the solubility of amorphous UO2, expected to form under reducing conditions. Any Cs and Sr release also ceased within 223 days indicating complete transition from dissolution of pre-oxidized phases and instant release fractions to conditions with inhibition of the dissolution of the fuel matrix. Gas phase analysis and pressure monitoring showed a steady build-up of hydrogen at a rate higher than what could be attributed to radiolysis, reaching hydrogen partial pressures of several hundred kPa. The results indicate continuous corrosion of iron, with magnetite as the dominating iron corrosion product.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Fuel and canister process report for the safety assessment SR-Can. SKB Technical Report, TR-06–22 (2006)Google Scholar
Criticality effects of long-term changes in material compositions and geometry in disposal canisters. SKB Technical Report, TR-16–06(20016)Google Scholar
Bonin, B., Colin, M., Dutfoy, A., J. Nucl. Mater. 281, 114 (2000).Google Scholar
Jonsson, M., ISRN Materials Science, vol. 2012, Article ID 639520, 13 pages, 2012.Google Scholar
Loida, A., Kelm, M., Kienzler, B., Geckeis, H., Bauer, A., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol 932 (2006).Google Scholar
Spahiu, K., Cui, D., Lundström, M., Radiochim. Acta 92, 626629, (2004).Google Scholar
Bruno, J., Cera, E., Grivé, M., Duro, L., Eriksen, T., Experimental determination and chemical modelling of radiolytic processes at the spent fuel/water interface. SKB Technical Report TR-03–03 (2003)Google Scholar
Smart, N. R, Rance, A.P., Werme, L. O, J. Nucl. Mater. 379 (2008) 97104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Faria, D. L. A., Venancio Silva, S, De Oliviera, M. T., J. Raman Spectrosc. 28 (1997) 873878.Google Scholar
Harcourt, G. A., Am. Mineral, 27 (1942) 90Google Scholar
Swanson, H. E., Natl. Bur. Stand. (U.S.), Circ. 539, IV (1955) 3Google Scholar
Guillamont, R. et al., Update on the chemical thermodynamics of U, Np, Pu, Am and Tc, OECD NEA, Elsevier 2003.Google Scholar
Huang, Y. H., Tang, C., Zeng, H., Chemical Engineering Journal, 200, 257263 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dzombak, D. A., Morel, F. M. M.. Surface complexation modeling: hydrous ferric oxide. John Wiley & Sons, 1990.Google Scholar
Baes, C. F., Mesmer, R. E., The Hydrolysis of Cations, Wiley, 1976Google Scholar