Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:01:15.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Skin Hydration Sensor for Customizable Electronic Textiles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2016

Murat A. Yokus  and
Michael A. Daniele
Murat A. Yokus
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, U.S.A. Department of Textile Engineering, Chemistry & Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, U.S.A.
Michael A. Daniele*
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, U.S.A. Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, North Carolina State University and University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 911 Oval Dr., Raleigh, NC 27695, U.S.A.
*
*(Email: [email protected])

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This paper introduces the design and simulated operation of a capacitive hydration sensor for integration into textile-based electronics. The multilayer patch is composed of a textile layer and an attached series of serpentine-interdigitated electrodes. The model used for simulations incorporated this design onto a representative model of skin. The serpentine-interdigitated electrodes are electrodes for capacitive measurement of skin hydration. In this study, the capacitance change relative to skin hydration was simulated using finite element analysis. The simulation results suggest the fabric layer had little effect on the capacitance of the sensor. Furthermore, the frequency domain simulations indicated that the capacitance of the sensor decreased with increasing frequency, and the decrease in capacitance was more significant for the dry skin compared to the wet skin. Therefore, the variation in the capacitance value of the serpentine-interdigitated electrodes can be employed for continuous skin hydration detection.

Keywords

electrical propertiessensortissue
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 1 , Issue 38: Materials Design , 2016 , pp. 2671 - 2676
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

References

REFERENCES

Popkin, B.M., D’Anci, K.E., and Rosenberg, I.H., Nutr. Rev. 68, 439 (2010).Google Scholar
Clarys, P., Clijsen, R., Taeymans, J., and Barel, A.O., Skin Res. Technol. Off. J. Int. Soc. Bioeng. Skin ISBS Int. Soc. Digit. Imaging Skin ISDIS Int. Soc. Skin Imaging ISSI 18, 316 (2012).Google Scholar
Berardesca, E. and European Group for Efficacy Measurements on Cosmetics and Other Topical Products (EEMCO), Skin Res. Technol. 3, 126 (1997).Google Scholar
Moran, D.S., Heled, Y., Margaliot, M., Shani, Y., Laor, A., Margaliot, S., Bickels, E.E., and Shapiro, Y., Physiol. Meas. 25, 51 (2004).Google Scholar
Mahmoud, Al-omari, Liu, G., Mueller, A., Mock, A., Ghosh, R.N., Smith, K., and Kaya, T., J. Appl. Phys. 116, 183102 (2014).Google Scholar
Zhang, S.L., Meyers, C.L., Subramanyan, K., and Hancewicz, T.M., J. Biomed. Opt. 10, 031107 (2005).Google Scholar
Huang, X., Yeo, W.-H., Liu, Y., and Rogers, J.A., Biointerphases 7, 1 (2012).Google Scholar
Wei, P., Morey, B., Dyson, T., McMahon, N., Hsu, Y.-Y., Gazman, S., Klinker, L., Ives, B., Dowling, K., and Rafferty, C., in 2013 IEEE Sens. (2013), pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
Huang, X., Liu, Y., Cheng, H., Shin, W.-J., Fan, J.A., Liu, Z., Lu, C.-J., Kong, G.-W., Chen, K., Patnaik, D., Lee, S.-H., Hage-Ali, S., Huang, Y., and Rogers, J.A., Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 3846 (2014).Google Scholar
Gao, W., Emaminejad, S., Nyein, H.Y.Y., Challa, S., Chen, K., Peck, A., Fahad, H.M., Ota, H., Shiraki, H., Kiriya, D., Lien, D.-H., Brooks, G.A., Davis, R.W., and Javey, A., Nature 529, 509 (2016).Google Scholar
Bandodkar, A.J., Molinnus, D., Mirza, O., Guinovart, T., Windmiller, J.R., Valdés-Ramírez, G., Andrade, F.J., Schöning, M.J., and Wang, J., Biosens. Bioelectron. 54, 603 (2014).Google Scholar
Gray, D.S., Tien, J., and Chen, C.S., Adv. Mater. 16, 393 (2004).Google Scholar
Wang, Y., Chong, N., Cheng, Y.L., Chan, H.L.W., and Choy, C.L., Microelectron. Eng. 66, 880 (2003).Google Scholar
Gevorgian, S.S., Martinsson, T., Linner, P.L.J., and Kollberg, E.L., IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 44, 896 (1996).Google Scholar
Miklavčič, D., Pavšelj, N., and Hart, F., Wiley Encyclopedia of Biomedical Engineering. (2006).Google Scholar
Gabriel, S., Lau, R.W., and Gabriel, C., Phys. Med. Biol. 41, 2271 (1996).Google Scholar
COMSOL AC/DC Module User’s Guide, Version 5.2.Google Scholar