Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:11:07.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Size Effect on the Strength and Deformation Behavior of Glassy Carbon Nanopillars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2019

Almut Albiez  and
Ruth Schwaiger Open the ORCID record for Ruth Schwaiger [Opens in a new window]
Almut Albiez
Affiliation:
Institute for Applied Materials (IAM), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), P.O. Box 3640, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
Ruth Schwaiger*
Affiliation:
Institute for Applied Materials (IAM), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), P.O. Box 3640, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
*
*Corresponding author: Ruth Schwaiger, e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Glassy carbon nanolattices can exhibit very high strength-to-weight ratios as a consequence of their small size and the material properties of the constituent material. Such nanolattices can be fabricated by pyrolysis of polymeric microlattices. To further elucidate the influence of the mechanical size effect of the constituent material, compression tests of glassy carbon nanopillars with varying sizes were performed. Depending on the specific initial polymer material and the nanopillar size, varying mechanical properties were observed. Small nanopillars exhibited elastic-plastic deformation before failure initiation. Moreover, for smaller nanopillars higher strength values were observed than for larger ones, which might be related to smaller defects and a lower defect concentration in the material.

Keywords

3D printingstrengthpyrolysisnanoscale
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 4 , Issue 2: Characterization, Mechanical Properties and Structure-Property Relationships , 2019 , pp. 133 - 138
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018

References

REFERENCES

Bauer, J., Schroer, A., Schwaiger, R. and Kraft, O., Nat. Mater. 15, 438–443 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lim, Y., Heo, J.-I., Madou, M. and Shin, H., Nanoscale Res. Lett. 8, 492 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, A.J., Mahoney, S., Carter, W.B. and Nutt, S., Carbon 49, 1025–1032 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, S., Materials 11, 1857 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowlard, F.C. and Lewis, J.C., J. Mater. Sci. 2, 507–512 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schueller, O.J.A., Brittain, S.T., Marzolin, C. and Whitesides, G.M., Chem. Mater. 9, 1399–1406 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, J.X., Bradt, R.C. and Walker, P.L. Jr., Carbon 23, 15–18 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sneddon, I.N., Int. J. Eng. Sci. 3, 47–57 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fei, H., Abraham, A., Chawla, N. and Jiang, H., J. Appl. Mech. 79, 061011 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, I., Gan, Y., Kaufmann, D., Kraft, O. and Schwaiger, R., J. Mater. Res. 27, 2752–2759 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masolin, A., Bouchard, P.-O., Martini, R. and Bernacki, M., J. Mater. Sci. 48, 979–988 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manoharan, M.P., Lee, H., Rajagopalan, R., Foley, H.C. and Haque, M.A., Nanoscale Res. Lett. 5, 14–19 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, G.M. and Kawamura, K., Polymeric carbons - carbon fibre, glass and char, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1976) pp. 11–35, 109-134.Google Scholar
Jenkins, G.M., Kawamura, K. and Ban, L.L., Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A: Mat. Phys. Eng. Sci. 327, 501–517 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauer, J., Schroer, A., Schwaiger, R., Tesari, I., Lange, C., Valdevit, L. and Kraft, O., Extreme Mechanics Letters 3, 105–112 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyers, M.A. and Chawla, K.K., Mechanical Behavior of Materials, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009) pp. 404–465.Google Scholar
Gao, H., Ji, B., Jäger, I.L., Arzt, E. and Fratzl, P., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 5597–5600 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawamura, K. and Jenkins, G.M., J. Mater. Sci. 7, 1099–1112 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bullock, R.E. and Kaae, J.L., J. Mater. Sci. 14, 920–930 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwaiger, R., Weber, M., Moser, B., Gumbsch, P. and Kraft, O., J. Mater. Res. 27, 266–277 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar