Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:31:26.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phase proportions, carbon equivalent, mechanical properties and their effect on material cost of railway axle steels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2018

D.E.P. Klenam ,
L.H. Chown ,
M.J. Papo  and
L.A. Cornish
D.E.P. Klenam*
Affiliation:
School of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, WITS2050, Johannesburg, South Africa DST-NRF Centre of Excellence in Strong Materials, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, WITS2050, Johannesburg, South Africa
L.H. Chown
Affiliation:
School of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, WITS2050, Johannesburg, South Africa DST-NRF Centre of Excellence in Strong Materials, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, WITS2050, Johannesburg, South Africa African Materials Science and Engineering Network (AMSEN), University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, WITS2050, Johannesburg, South Africa.
M.J. Papo
Affiliation:
DST-NRF Centre of Excellence in Strong Materials, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, WITS2050, Johannesburg, South Africa Advanced Materials Division, Mintek, Randburg2125, South Africa
L.A. Cornish
Affiliation:
School of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, WITS2050, Johannesburg, South Africa DST-NRF Centre of Excellence in Strong Materials, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, WITS2050, Johannesburg, South Africa African Materials Science and Engineering Network (AMSEN), University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, WITS2050, Johannesburg, South Africa.
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Commuter trains with solid axle configuration are produced from medium carbon steel due to cost restrictions. High-speed trains have hollow axle configuration for reduced weight and are made from high strength low-alloy (HSLA) steels. The HSLA steels have higher amounts of C, Cr, Ni, Mo, V and Nb, and are more expensive than medium carbon steels. The effects of phase proportions, carbon equivalent (CE), yield strength and ultimate tensile strength (UTS) on material costs of existing railway axle steels were studied using Thermo-Calc. Medium carbon rail axle steels had higher Fe3C phase proportions than the HSLA steel rail axle grades. Higher affinity of Cr, Mo and V for C than Fe resulted in decreased cementite proportions. The HSLA steels had yield strengths above 370 MPa, and UTS above 750 MPa, with increased material cost above $3300 per ton. A scattered distribution was observed for the pearlite weight fraction and material costs, with most between $3200 and $3400. The yield and tensile strengths increased with increasing carbon equivalent and pearlite weight fraction. The data aided the selection and design of alloys with better mechanical and corrosion properties at reduced material cost.

Keywords

alloystrengthhardnesschemical composition
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 3 , Issue 37: African Materials Research Society 2017 , 2018 , pp. 2169 - 2181
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Smith, R.A. and Hillmansen, S., Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Pt. F J Rail Rapid Transit, 218(4), 267 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoddinott, D.S., Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Pt. F J. Rail Rapid Transit, 218(4), 283 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillmanson, S. and Smith, R.A., Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Pt. F J. Rail Rapid Transit, 218(4), 327 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zerbst, U., Beretta, S., Kohler, G., Lawton, A., Vormwald, M., Beier, H. Th., Klinger, C., Cerny, I., Rudlin, J., Heckel, T. and Kingbeil, D., Eng. Fract. Mech, 98, 214 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moon, A., Sangal, S. and Mondal, T, K.. Indian Institute of Metals, 66(1), 33 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Standard, EN 13261. Railway, European Committee for Standardization (CEN), Brussels, Belgium, (2003).Google Scholar
Manual of Standards and Recommended Practices, The Association of American Railroads (AAR), Washington DC, USA (2009).Google Scholar
Klenam, D.E.P., Chown, L.H., Papo, M.J., Smith, M. and Cornish, L.A., Afri. Cor. Jour. 2(2) 1(2016).Google Scholar
Modi, O.P., Deshmukh, N., Mondal, D.P., Jha, A.K., Yegneswaran, A.H. and Khaira, H.K., Mat. Char. 46, 347 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasuya, T. and Yurioka, N., Welding Res. Suppl. 263 (1993).Google Scholar
Durand-Charre, M., Microstructure of Steels and Cast Irons (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany 2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J.W., Lu, L.T., Wu, P.B., Ma, J.J., Wang, G.G. and Zhang, W.H., Mat. Sci. and Eng. A, 562, 211 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, J.F., Luo, J., Mo, J.L., Peng, J.F., Jin, X.S. and Zhu, M.H., Trib. Int. 43(5-6), 906 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Japanese Standards Association, Axles for railway rolling stock, Japanese Industrial Standard E 4502, Japan (1989).Google Scholar
Transnet freight railway specification for the supply of axles for traction and railway stocks, Technology Management Specification RS/ME/SP 002 Rev. No. 2, Germiston, South Africa (2014).Google Scholar
Davis, J.R., Alloying, Understanding the Basics, ASM International, Materials Park, OH, USA (2001).Google Scholar
Mancini, G., Corbizi, A., Lombardo, F. and Cervello, S., Proc. 7th World Congress on Railway Research, Montreal, Canada (2006).Google Scholar