Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:31:58.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Optimization of fluid characteristics of 2D materials for inkjet printing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2016

Monica Michel
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical, Materials and Biomedical Engineering University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA.
Jay A. Desai
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical, Materials and Biomedical Engineering University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA.
Alberto Delgado
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical, Materials and Biomedical Engineering University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA.
Chandan Biswas
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical, Materials and Biomedical Engineering University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA.
Anupama B. Kaul*
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical, Materials and Biomedical Engineering University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA.
*
Get access

Abstract

2D materials have shown to be the next step in semiconductor use and device manufacturing that can allow us to reduce the size of most electronics. One of the novel ways to obtain 2D materials is through liquid exfoliation, in which these materials can be obtained by dispersing the smallest possible particles in different solvents. Once obtained, the solutions can be used to manufacture devices via different processes, one of which is inkjet printing. This process relies in selecting “jettable” fluids, which need to have the necessary combination of viscosity and surface energy or “wettability”. In this work we have modified the viscosities and surface energies of five solvents: IPA (Isopropanol), NMP (N-methyl – 2 pyrrolidone), DMA (Dimethylacetamide), DMF (Dimethylformamide) and a mixture of Cyclohexanone / Terpineol 7:3. We have found an avenue to tailor the viscosity of these solvents though the addition of Ethyl Cellulose (EC), where the viscosity has been increased by up to 15 times at an EC concentration of 6%. For inkjet printing, ideally a viscosity of 4 – 10 cP is recommended, which we have been able to achieve with all of the solvents studied. It has been found that the different solvents present different susceptibilities to the EC addition, with DMA and DMF being the least sensitive to the EC addition. We have also studied the change in the drop dynamics and interactions of the 2D solutions with the substrate. Through this analysis we have found solvents that appear to be attractive for inkjet printing of MoS2 and graphite.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Coleman, J. N., “Liquid exfoliation of defect-free graphene.,” Science, 2013.Google Scholar
Kaul, A., “Two-dimensional layered materials: Structure, properties, and prospects for device applications,” Journal for Materials Research, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 348361, 2014.Google Scholar
Lotya, M., Hernandez, Y., King, P. J., Smith, R. J. and Nicolosi, V., “Liquid Phase Production of Graphene by Exfoliation of Graphite in Surfactant/Water Solutions,” Journal American Chemistry Society, vol. 131, pp. 36113620, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valeria Nicolosi, V., Chhowalla, M., Kanatzidis, M. G. and Strano, M. S., “Liquid Exfoliation of Layered Materials,” Science, vol. 340, p. 1226419, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secor, E. B., Prabhumirashi, P. L., Puntambekar, K., Geier, M. L. and Hersam, M. C., “Inkjet Printing of High Conductivity, Flexible Graphene Patterns,” The journal of physical chemistry letters, 2013, 4, 8, 1347-1351, ACS Publications, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 13471351, 2013.Google Scholar
Torrisi, F. et al. , “Inkjet-printed graphene electronics,” Nano, vol. 6, p. 2992, 2012.Google Scholar
Capasso, A., Castillo, A. D. R., Sun, H., Ansaldo, A., Pellegrini, V. and Bonaccorso, F., “Ink-jet printing of graphene for flexible electronics: An environmentally-friendly approach,” Solid State Commun, vol. 224, pp. 5363, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. J. et al. , “Large-scale exfoliation of inorganic layered compounds in aqueous surfactant solutions.,” Advanced Materials, vol. 23, p. 3944, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gan, H., Shan, X., Eriksson, T., Lok, B. K. and Lam, Y. C., “Reduction of droplet volume by controllilng actuating waveforms in inkjet printing for micro-pattern formation,” Journal of micromechanics and microengineering, pp. 18, 2009.Google Scholar
Singh, M., Haverinen, H. M., Dhagat, P. and Jabbour, G. E., “Inkjet printing process and applications,” Advanced Materials, vol. 22, pp. 673685, 2010.Google Scholar
Mak, K. F., Lee, C., Hone, J., Shan, J. and Heinz, T. F., “Atomically thin MoS 2: a new direct-gap semiconductor,” Phys.Rev.Lett., vol. 105, no. 13, p. 136805, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castellanos-Gomez, A., Quereda, J., van der Meulen, H. P., Agraït, N. and Rubio-Bollinger, G., “Spatially resolved optical absorption spectroscopy of single-and few-layer MoS2 by hyperspectral imaging,” Nanotechnology, vol. 27, no. 11, p. 115705, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, A., Lakshmi, K. and Huang, L., “Eco-friendly synthesis of metal dichalcogenides nanosheets and their environmental remediation potential driven by visible light,” Sci.Rep., vol. 5, p. 15718, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Michel, M., Desai, J., Biswas, C. and Kaul, A., “Engineering Chemically Exfoliated Dispersions of Two-dimensional Graphite and Molybdenum Disulphide for Ink-Jet Printing”,” Nanotechnology, 2016 (in review).Google Scholar