Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:34:14.139Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Carbon Nanotube Sock Formation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2016

Guangfeng Hou ,
Vianessa Ng ,
Yi Song ,
Lu Zhang ,
Chenhao Xu ,
Vesselin Shanov ,
David Mast ,
Mark Schulz  and
Yijun Liu
Guangfeng Hou
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Cincinnati, OH 45221, United States
Vianessa Ng
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Cincinnati, OH 45221, United States
Yi Song
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Cincinnati, OH 45221, United States
Lu Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Cincinnati, OH 45221, United States
Chenhao Xu
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Cincinnati, OH 45221, United States
Vesselin Shanov
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Cincinnati, OH 45221, United States
David Mast
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Cincinnati, OH 45221, United States
Mark Schulz*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Cincinnati, OH 45221, United States
Yijun Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University of Cincinnati, OH 45221, United States
*
*Corresponding author. Tel: (513) 556-4132; fax: (513) 556–3390; email: [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

Formation of the carbon nanotube (CNT) sock, which is an assemblage of nanotubes in a thin cylindrical shape, is a prerequisite for continuous production of thread and sheet using the floating catalyst growth method. Although several studies have considered sock formation mechanisms, the dynamics of the sock behavior during the synthesis process are not well understood. In this work, a computational technique is utilized to explore the multiphysics environment within the nanotube reactor affecting the sock formation and structure. Specifically the flow field, temperature profile, catalyst nucleation, and residence time are investigated and their influence on the sock formation and properties are studied. We demonstrate that it is critical to control the multiphysics synthesis environment in order to form a stable sock. Sock production rate was studied experimentally and found to be linearly dependent on the amount of effective catalyst (iron in the sock) inside the reactor. To achieve a high sock production rate, the proportion of effective iron has to be high when increasing the total amount of catalyst in the reactor. Based on the analysis, we suggest that using small size catalyst and growing longer CNTs by increasing temperature, increasing residence times etc. will increase the CNT production rate and improve the properties of CNT thread/sheet produced from the sock.

Keywords

nanostructuresimulationchemical synthesis
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 2 , Issue 1: Nanomaterials , 2017 , pp. 21 - 26
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Sun, D., Timmermans, M.Y., Tian, Y., Nasibulin, A.G., Kauppinen, E.I., Kishimoto, S., Mizutani, T., and Ohno, Y., Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 156 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, G., Zhang, L., Ng, V., Wu, Z., and Schulz, M., Nano Life 6, 1642006 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, Y., Chauhan, D., Hou, G., Wen, X., Kattoura, M., and Ryan, C., in ASC 31st Tech. Conf. Willamsbg. VA (2016).Google Scholar
Alvarez, N.T., Miller, P., Haase, M., Kienzle, N., Zhang, L., Schulz, M.J., and Shanov, V., Carbon N. Y. 86, 350 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, S., Koziol, K.K.K., a Kinloch, I., and Windle, A.H., Small 4, 1217 (2008).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, Y.-L., a Kinloch, I., and Windle, A.H., Science 304, 276 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conroy, D., Moisala, A., Cardoso, S., Windle, A., and Davidson, J., Chem. Eng. Sci. 65, 2965 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, K.-H., Lee, S.-H., Park, J., Kim, H.-R., and Lee, J., RSC Adv. 41894 (2015).Google Scholar
Motta, M., Kinloch, I., Moisala, A., Premnath, V., Pick, M., and Windle, A., Phys. E Low-Dimensional Syst. Nanostructures 37, 40 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, X.-H., Li, Y.-L., Feng, J.-M., Kang, Y.-R., and Han, S.-S., Nanoscale 4, 5614 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, X.H., Li, Y.L., Liu, Y.K., Qiao, X.H., Feng, Y., Liang, J., Jin, J., Zhu, L., Hou, F., and Li, J.Y., Adv. Mater. 22, 692 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaffee, J., Lashmore, D., Lewis, D., Mann, J., Schauer, M., and White, B., Nsti Nanotech 2008, Vol 3, Tech. Proc. 3, 118 (2008).Google Scholar
Hou, G., Su, R., Wang, A., Ng, V., Li, W., Song, Y., Zhang, L., Sundaram, M., Shanov, V., Mast, D., Lashmore, D., Schulz, M., and Liu, Y., Carbon N. Y. 102, 513 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.-H., Park, J., Kim, H.-R., Lee, T., Lee, J., Im, Y.-O., Lee, C.-H., Cho, H., Lee, H., Jun, C.-H., Ahn, Y.-C., Lee, I.-B., and Lee, K.-H., Carbon N. Y. 100, 647 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikhalchan, A., Fan, Z., Tran, T.Q., Liu, P., Tan, V.B.C., Tay, T.-E., and Duong, H.M., Carbon N. Y. 102, 409 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vahedein, Y.S. and Schrlau, M.G., in 13th Int. Conf. Nanochannels, Microchannels, Minichannels (2015), pp. 0–10.Google Scholar
Meshot, E.R., Plata, D.L., Tawfick, S., Zhang, Y., Verploegen, E.A., and Hart, A.J., ACS Nano 3, 2477 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, H.M., Li, F., Su, G., Pan, H.Y., He, L.L., Sun, X., and Dresselhaus, M.S., Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 3282 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
S.M. Shanov, VN, Gorton, A, Yun, YH, US20080095695 (2014).Google Scholar