Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:15:02.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human and Environment Influences on Thermoelectric Energy Harvesting Toward Self-Powered Textile-Integrated Wearable Devices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2016

Amanda Myers ,
Ryan Hodges  and
Jesse S. Jur
Amanda Myers
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, 911 Oval Drive, Raleigh, NC 27695, U.S.A.
Ryan Hodges
Affiliation:
Department of Textile Engineering, Chemistry and Science, North Carolina State University, 1000 Main Campus Drive, Raleigh, NC 27695, U. S. A.
Jesse S. Jur*
Affiliation:
Department of Textile Engineering, Chemistry and Science, North Carolina State University, 1000 Main Campus Drive, Raleigh, NC 27695, U. S. A.
*
*(Email: [email protected])

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The study of on-body energy harvesting is most often focused on improving and optimizing the energy harvester. However, other factors play a critical factor in the energy harvesting integration techniques of the harvester to close-to body materials of the wearable device. In addition, one must recognize the wide array of human factors and ergonomic factors that lead a variation of the energy harvesting. In this work, key affecting variables at varying on-body locations are investigated for commercial thermoelectric generators (TEGs) integrated within a textile-based wearable platform. For this study, a headband and an armband is demonstrated with five TEGs connected in series in a flexible form factor via Pyralux®. These platforms enable comparison of the amount of energy harvested from the forehead versus the upper arm during various external conditions and movement profiles, e.g. running, walking, and stationary for periods of up to 60 minutes. During these tests, ambient temperature, ambient humidity, accelerometry, and instantaneous power are recorded live during the activity and correlated to the energy harvested. Human factors such as skin temperature and application pressure were also analyzed. Our analysis demonstrates that vigorous movement can generate over 100 μW of instantaneous power from the headband and up to 35 μW from the armband. During the stationary movement profile, the instantaneous power levels of both the headband and the armband decreased to a negligible value. Our studies show that for higher intensities of movement, air convection on the cool side of the TEG is the dominating variable whereas the temperature gradient has a significant effect when the subject is stationary. This work demonstrates key materials and design factors in on-body thermoelectric energy harvesting that allows for a strategic approach to improving the integration of the TEGs.

Keywords

thermoelectricenergy generationthermal stresses
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 1 , Issue 38: Materials Design , 2016 , pp. 2665 - 2670
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

References

REFERENCES

Misra, V., Bozkurt, A., Calhoun, B., Jackson, T., Jur, J., Lach, J., Lee, B., Muth, J., Oralkan, O., Ozturk, M., Trolier-McKinstry, S., Vashaee, D., Wentzloff, D., and Zhu, Y., “Flexible technologies for self-powered wearable health and environmental sensing,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 103, no. 4, pp. 665–681, 2015.Google Scholar
Starner, T. and Paradiso, J., “Human generated power for mobile electronics,” Low-power Electron. Des., vol. 1990, 2004.Google Scholar
Leonov, V. and Vullers, R. J. M., “Wearable Thermoelectric Generators for Body-Powered Devices,” J. Electron. Mater., vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 1491–1498, Jan. 2009.Google Scholar
Harb, A., “Energy harvesting: State-of-the-art,” Renew. Energy, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 2641–2654, Oct. 2011.Google Scholar
Mitcheson, B. P. D., Ieee, M., Yeatman, E. M., Ieee, S. M., Rao, G. K., Ieee, S. M., Holmes, A. S., and Green, T. C., “Energy Harvesting From Human and Machine Motion forWireless Electronic Devices,” vol. 96, no. 9, pp. 1457–1486, 2008.Google Scholar
Wahbah, M., Alhawari, M., Mohammad, B., Saleh, H., and Ismail, M., “Characterization of Human Body-Based Thermal and Vibration Energy Harvesting for Wearable Devices,” IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Circuits Syst., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 354–363, Sep. 2014.Google Scholar
Stevens, J. W., “Optimal design of small ΔT thermoelectric generation systems,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 709–720, Apr. 2001.Google Scholar
Leonov, V. and Vullers, R. J. M., “Wearable electronics self-powered by using human body heat: The state of the art and the perspective,” J. Renew. Sustain. Energy, vol. 1, no. 6, p. 062701, 2009.Google Scholar
Leonov, V., Van Hoof, C., and Vullers, R. J. M., “Thermoelectric and Hybrid Generators in Wearable Devices and Clothes,” in 2009 Sixth International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks, 2009, pp. 195–200.Google Scholar
Leonov, V., “Energy Harvesting for Self-Powered Wearable Devices,” in Wearable Monitoring Systems, Bonfiglio, A. and De Rossi, D., Eds. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2011, pp. 27–49.Google Scholar
Lossec, M., Multon, B., and Ben Ahmed, H., “Sizing optimization of a thermoelectric generator set with heatsink for harvesting human body heat,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 68, pp. 260–265, Apr. 2013.Google Scholar