Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T03:31:36.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Enhancing performance of microbial fuel cell treating distillery wastewater using carbon supported Nickel-phthalocyanine/MnOx as novel cathode catalyst

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2018

B. R. Tiwari ,
Md. T. Noori  and
M. M. Ghangrekar
B. R. Tiwari
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur-721302, India
Md. T. Noori
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture and Food Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur-721302, India
M. M. Ghangrekar*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur-721302, India
*
*(Email: [email protected])
Get access

Abstract

Three MFCs with different catalyst incorporated on carbon felt cathode, viz. nickel phthalocyanine-MnOx (NiPc-MnOx) composite (MFC-1), platinum (MFC-2), control MFC with bare carbon felt (MFC-3) were used for treating distillery wastewater. The linear sweep voltammetry studies revealed that a maximum current density of 3.7 Am-2 was achieved for NiPc-MnOx/C catalysed cathode, which is 13-folds higher than that for control cathode (0.27 Am-2). Consequently, MFC-1 demonstrated a power density of 48.8 mWm-2, which was around 3.3-folds higher than the control MFC (14.9 mWm-2) owing to the improved oxidation reduction kinetics in case of NiPc-MnOx/C catalysed cathode. Coulombic efficiency (CE) was enhanced by a margin of about 11 % for MFC-1 (24.8 %) in comparison to MFC-3 (13.4 %). MFC-2 having platinum cathode catalyst exhibited a power density of 61.3 mWm-2, which was slightly higher than that achieved by MFC-2. However, NiPc-MnOx was prepared at 3-fold less cost as compared to platinum. Hence, NiPc-MnOx/C can be used as an alternative to platinum as cathode catalyst in MFC treating distillery wastewater.

Keywords

catalyticenergy generationSustainability
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 3 , Issue 13: Broader Impact , 2018 , pp. 657 - 662
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Noori, Md.T., Ghangrekar, M.M., Mukherjee, C.K., Electrochim. Acta. 228, 513 (2017).Google Scholar
Ghasemi, M., Daud, W.R.W., Hassan, S.H.A., Oh, S.E., Ismail, M., Rahimnejad, M., Jahim, J.M., J. Alloys Compd. 580, 245 (2013).Google Scholar
Tiwari, B.R., Noori, Md.T., Ghangrekar, M.M., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42, 23085 (2017).Google Scholar
Tiwari, B.R., Noori, Md.T., Ghangrekar, M.M., Mater. Chem. Phys. 182, 86 (2016).Google Scholar
Tiwari, B.R., Ghangrekar, M.M., Energy Fuels, 29, 3518 (2015).Google Scholar
APHA, AWWA, WPCF. Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater, 20th ed. (American Public Health Association. Washington DC, 1998).Google Scholar
Logan, B.E., Microbial Fuel Cells, (Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ. 2008)Google Scholar