Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T23:59:20.206Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electrocatalytic Activity of Some Cobalt Based Sodium Phosphates in Alkaline Solution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 January 2018

Debasmita Dwibedi ,
Ritambhara Gond ,
Krishnakanth Sada ,
Baskar Senthilkumar  and
Prabeer Barpanda
Debasmita Dwibedi*
Affiliation:
Faraday Materials Lab, Materials Research Centre, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore560012, India.
Ritambhara Gond
Affiliation:
Faraday Materials Lab, Materials Research Centre, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore560012, India.
Krishnakanth Sada
Affiliation:
Faraday Materials Lab, Materials Research Centre, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore560012, India.
Baskar Senthilkumar
Affiliation:
Faraday Materials Lab, Materials Research Centre, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore560012, India.
Prabeer Barpanda
Affiliation:
Faraday Materials Lab, Materials Research Centre, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore560012, India.
*
*Corresponding Author: Debasmita Dwibedi, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The development of efficient water oxidation catalyst is a major path to realize water splitting systems, which could benefit high performance and cost-effective metal-air batteries, fuel cells and solar energy conversion. To date, the rare crustal abundant platinum group metals rule this sector with Pt-alloys being the best for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and ruthenium oxides for oxygen evolution reaction (OER) in acidic solution. However, they show poor stability and are too expensive for large scale applications. Moreover, oxygen reduction in basic solutions can otherwise be catalysed by metal oxide with non-precious earth abundant transition metals (e.g. Fe, Co, Ni). Hence, there is a massive demand to explore noble metal free bifunctional electrocatalysts. In this work, we present the electrocatalytic activity of three cobalt based sodium phosphates namely NaCoPO4 (with one phosphate), Na2CoP2O7 (with two phosphate) NaFe2Co(PO4)3 (with three phosphate). Synthesized by solution combustion route, all these phosphates confirmed phase purity. NaCoPO4 and Na2CoP2O7 adopted orthorhombic structure with Pnma and Pna21 space group respectively; whereas NaFe2Co(PO4)3 crystallized in monoclinic (C2/c) framework. Electrocatalytic activity of these cobalt phosphates were inspected by linear sweep voltammetry with rotating disk electrode (RDE). All three showed promising bifunctional activity. In fact, the ORR activities of both orthorhombic cobalt phosphates are comparable to Vulcan carbon and Pt/C. OER activity of Na2CoP2O7 overrode other phosphates. The bifunctional activity and good stability of these sodium cobalt phosphates stem from cobalt ions and stabilization of the catalytic centres by the phosphate frameworks. The present work builds a detail structure-property correlation in these phosphate systems and also demonstrates the possibility of utilizing these sodium cobalt phosphates as alternate cost-effective, novel electrocatalysts for efficient OER/ORR activity in alkaline solution.

Keywords

catalyticoxidationcombustion synthesis
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 3 , Issue 22: Energy and Sustainability , 2018 , pp. 1215 - 1220
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dunn, B., Kamath, H. and Tarascon, J. M., Science, 334, 928–935 (2011).Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Zhao, Z., Zia, Z. and Dai, L., Nat. Nanotechnol., 10, 444–452 (2015).Google Scholar
Das, S. K., Lau, S. and Archer, L.., J. Mater. Chem. A, 2, 12623–12629 (2014).Google Scholar
Bruce, P.G., Freunberger, S.A., Hardwick, L.J. and Tarascon, J.M., Nat. Mater., 11, 19–29 (2012).Google Scholar
Zhang, J., Zhao, Z., Zia, Z. and Dai, L., Nat. Nanotechnol., 10, 444–452 (2015).Google Scholar
Kim, H., Park, I., Seo, D. H., Lee, S., Kim, S. W., Kwon, W. J., Park, Y. U., Kim, C. S., Jeon, S. and Kang, K., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 134, 10369–10372 (2012).Google Scholar
Nie, Y., Li, L., Wei, Z., Chem. Soc. Rev., 44, 2168–2201 (2015)Google Scholar
Reier, T., Oezaslan, M., Strasser, P., ACS Catal., 2, 1765–1772 (2012)Google Scholar
Forgie, R., Bugosh, G., Neyerlin, K. C., Liu, Z., Strasser, P., Electrochem. Solid-State Lett., 13, B36–B39 (2010).Google Scholar
Fabbri, E., Habereder, A., Waltar, K., Kotz, R., Schmidt, T.J., Catal. Sci. Technol., 4, 3800–3821 (2014).Google Scholar
Gong, M. and Dai, H., Nano Res., 8, 23–39 (2014).Google Scholar
Xing, J., Li, H., Cheng, M.C., Geyer, S. M., Ng, K.S., Mater, J.. Chem. A, 4, 13866–13873 (2016).Google Scholar
Zhan, Y., Lu, M., Yang, S., Liu, Z., Lee, J. Y., ChemElectroChem, 3, 615–621 (2016).Google Scholar
Gorlin, Y., Jaramillo, T. F., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 132, 13612–13614 (2010).Google Scholar
Gond, R., Sada, K., Senthilkumar, B., Barpanda, P., ChemElectroChem, 5, 153–158 (2018).Google Scholar
Larson, A. C. and von Dreele, R. B., General Structure Analysis System (GSAS); Los Alamos National Laboratory Report, LAUR 86-748, Los Alamos National Laboratory, NM, (1994).Google Scholar
Momma, K., Izumi, F., J. Appl. Cryst., 44, 1272–1276 (2011).Google Scholar
Trad, K., Carlier, D., Croguennec, L., Wattiaux, A., Amara, M. B., Delmas, C., Chem. Mater., 22, 5554–5562 (2010).Google Scholar