Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:02:25.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diffusional Decomposition and Glass Forming Ability of Solidifying Ternary Liquids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2016

E. Eshed ,
M. Bamberger  and
A. Katsman
E. Eshed
Affiliation:
Israel Institute of Metals, Techion, 32000 Haifa, Israel
M. Bamberger
Affiliation:
Department of Science and Materials Engineering, Technion, 32000 Haifa, Israel
A. Katsman*
Affiliation:
Department of Science and Materials Engineering, Technion, 32000 Haifa, Israel
*
*(Email: [email protected])
Get access

Abstract

An innovative model based on spinodal-like decomposition of supercooled multi-component liquids was developed for prediction of the glass forming ability (GFA) of ternary alloys. The up-hill diffusion in the initially homogeneous freezing ternary liquid was considered as a necessary condition for solidification of crystalline phases. New generalized criteria of spinodal decomposition of ternary alloys for time/space correlated fluctuations were formulated. These criteria take into account both thermodynamic and kinetic properties of the system. The introduced criteria were found to provide adequate GFA evaluation of different compositions in the Mg-based ternary alloys.

Keywords

diffusionrapid solidificationphase transformation
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 1 , Issue 26: Theory, Characterization, and Modeling , 2016 , pp. 1935 - 1940
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Telford, M.: Materials Today, 2004, pp. 36–43.Google Scholar
Gebert, A., Wolff, U., John, A. and Eckert, J.: Scripta Materialia, 43 (2000), 279–283.Google Scholar
Trexler, M.M., Thadhani, N.N.: Progress in Materials Science, 55, 8 (2010) 759–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoue, A. and Masumoto, T.: Mater.Sci.Engin. A, 173 (1993) 1–8.Google Scholar
Inoue, A., Kato, A., Zhang, T., Kim, S. G. and Masumoto, T.: Mater.Trans. JIM, 32, 7 (1991) 609–616.Google Scholar
Berry, J., Elder, K. R. and Grant, M.: Phys. Rev. E, 77, 06(1506) (2008) 1–7.Google Scholar
Tóth, G.I., Pusztai, T., Tegze, G., Tóth, G. and Gránaśy, L.: Phys.Rev.Let, 107,17 (2011) 1–4.Google Scholar
Archer, A. J., Robbins, M. J., Thiele, U. and Knobloch, E.: Phys.Rev.E, 86, 3 (2012) 1–13.Google Scholar
Eshed, E., Bamberger, M., Katsman, A.: MRS Proceedings, Bulk Metallic Glasses, 1649, mrsf13-1649-ii03-08 doi:10.1557/opl.2014.92, 2014.Google Scholar
Bhattacharyya, S. and Abinandanan, T.A.: Bull. Mater. Sci.,, 26, 1, (2003) 193–197.Google Scholar
Bohong, J., Meihua, Z., Qing, W., Zuyao, X.: Acta Metall. Sinica (English Edition) B, 4, 2 (1991) 75–81.Google Scholar
Eshed, E., Bamberger, M., Katsman, A., Metal.Mater. Transactions A, 10 (2015) 1–13.Google Scholar