Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T00:13:02.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Design of honeycomb structures with tunable acoustic properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2019

Maen Alkhader
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE
Bassam Abu-Nabah
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE
Mostafa Elyoussef
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, American University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE
T. A. Venkatesh*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Chemical Engineering, Stony Brook University, NY11794
*
Get access

Abstract

Honeycomb structures, owing to their microstructural periodicity, exhibit unique and complex acoustic properties. Tuning their acoustic properties typically involves either changing their topology or porosity. The former route can lead to topologies that may not be readily amenable for large-scale production, while the latter could negatively affect the honeycombs’ weight. An ideal approach for tailoring the acoustic behavior of honeycombs should neither affect their porosity nor should they require customized and expensive fabrication methods. In this work, a novel honeycomb design that alters the microstructural topological features in a relatively simple way, while preserving the porosity of the honeycombs, to tune the acoustic properties of the honeycombs is proposed. The proposed honeycomb can be fabricated using the traditional approach employed to mass produce honeycomb structures; that is by bonding identical corrugated sheets with two periodic thicknesses. The acoustic behavior of the proposed honeycomb in terms of dispersion and phase velocities is analyzed using the finite element method. Simulation results demonstrate the potential of the designed honeycomb to exhibit tailored acoustic behavior at a constant porosity or mass. For example, it is demonstrated that the phase velocities of asymmetric and symmetric waves traversing the proposed honeycomb of aluminum with 90% porosity can be tuned by 30% and 17%, respectively.

Keywords

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Crupi, V., Epasto, G., and Guglielmino, E., Comparison of aluminium sandwiches for lightweight ship structures: honeycomb vs. foam. Marine Structures, 2013. 30: p. 74-96.Google Scholar
GibsonL., J. L., J. and Ashby, F., M., Cellular solids: structure and properties. 1997: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmed, A., Alkhader, M., and Abu-Nabah, B., In-plane elastic wave propagation in aluminum honeycomb cores fabricated by bonding corrugated sheets. Journal of Sandwich Structures & Materials, 2017: p. 1099636217729569.Google Scholar
Iyer, S., Alkhader, M., and Venkatesh, T. A., On the relationships between cellular structure, deformation modes and electromechanical properties of piezoelectric cellular solids. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2016. 80: p. 73-83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alkhader, M., Nazzal, M., and Louca, K., Design of bending dominated lattice architectures with improved stiffness using hierarchy. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science. 0(0): p. 0954406218810298.Google Scholar
Iyer, S., Alkhader, M., and Venkatesh, T. A., Electromechanical response of piezoelectric honeycomb foam structures. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2014. 97(3): p. 826-834.Google Scholar
Alkhader, M. and Vural, M., Mechanical response of cellular solids: Role of cellular topology and microstructural irregularity. International Journal of Engineering Science, 2008. 46(10): p. 1035-1051.Google Scholar
Alkhader, M., Iyer, S., Shi, W, and Venkatesh, T. A., Low frequency acoustic characteristics of periodic honeycomb cellular cores: The effect of relative density and strain fields. Composite Structures, 2015. 133: p. 77-84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertoldi, K. and Boyce, M., Mechanically triggered transformations of phononic band gaps in periodic elastomeric structures. Physical Review B, 2008. 77(5): p. 052105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinsson, P. and Movchan, A., Vibrations of lattice structures and phononic band gaps. The Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics, 2003. 56(1): p. 45-64.Google Scholar
Spadoni, A., Ruzzene, M., Gonella, S., and Scarpa, F., Phononic properties of hexagonal chiral lattices. Wave Motion, 2009. 46(7): p. 435-450.Google Scholar
Gonella, S. and Ruzzene, M., Analysis of in-plane wave propagation in hexagonal and re-entrant lattices. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2008. 312(1): p. 125-139.Google Scholar
Mukherjee, S., Scarpa, F., and Gopalakrishnan, S., Phononic band gap design in honeycomb lattice with combinations of auxetic and conventional core. Smart Materials and Structures, 2016. 25(5): p. 054011.Google Scholar
Ruzzene, M. and Scarpa, F., Directional and band-gap behavior of periodic auxetic lattices. physica status solidi (b), 2005. 242(3): p. 665-680.Google Scholar
Ruzzene, M., Scarpa, F., and Soranna, F., Wave beaming effects in two-dimensional cellular structures. Smart materials and structures, 2003. 12(3): p. 363.Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Sun, X. Z., and Chen, S. T., Band gap structures in two-dimensional super porous phononic crystals. Ultrasonics, 2013. 53(2): p. 518-524.Google ScholarPubMed
Chen, S., Fan, Y., Fu, Q., Wu, H., Jin, Y., Zheng, J., and Zhang, F., A review of tunable acoustic metamaterials. Applied Sciences, 2018. 8(9): p. 1480.Google Scholar
Brillouin, L., Wave propagation in periodic structures: electric filters and crystal lattices. 2003: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Bathe, K.-J., Finite element procedures. 2006: Klaus-Jurgen Bathe.Google Scholar