Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:39:07.604Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Correlation-Induced Band Competition in SrTiO3/LaAlO3

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2017

Eran Maniv*
Affiliation:
Raymond and Beverly Sackler School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
Yoram Dagan
Affiliation:
Raymond and Beverly Sackler School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
Moshe Goldstein
Affiliation:
Raymond and Beverly Sackler School of Physics and Astronomy, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
*

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The oxide interface SrTiO3/LaAlO3 supports a 2D electron liquid displaying superconductivity and magnetism, while allowing for a continuous control of the electron density using a gate. Our recent measurements have shown a similar surprising nonmonotonic behavior as function of the gate voltage (carrier density) of three quantities: the superconducting critical temperature and field, the inverse Hall coefficient, and the frequency of quantum oscillations. While the total density has to be monotonic as function of gate, the last result indicates that one of the involved bands has a nonmontonic occupancy as function of the chemical potential. We show how electronic interactions can lead to such an effect, by creating a competition between the involved bands and making their sturcture non-rigid, and thus account for all these effects. Adding Fock terms to our previous Hartree treatment makes this scenario even more generic.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

References

REFERENCES

Mannhart, J. et al., Science 327, 1607 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohtomo, A. and Hwang, H. Y. Nature 427, 423 (2004).Google Scholar
Thiel, S. et al., Science 313, 1942 (2006).Google Scholar
Hosoda, M. et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 103507 (2013).Google Scholar
Reyren, N. et al., Science 317, 1196 (2007).Google Scholar
Caviglia, A. D. et al., Nature 456, 624 (2008).Google Scholar
Kalisky, B. et al . Nat. Commun. 3, 922 (2012).Google Scholar
Ron, A. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 216801 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshua, A. et al., Nat. Commun. 3, 1129 (2012).Google Scholar
Maniv, E. et al., Nat. Commun. 6, 8239 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagotto, E., Rev. Mod. Phys. 66, 763 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben Shalom, M. et al . Phys. Rev. B 80, 140403 (2009).Google Scholar
Ben Shalom, M. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 206401 (2010).Google Scholar
Christen, H-M. et al., Phys. Rev. B 49, 12095 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popovic, Z. S. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 256801 (2008).Google Scholar
Santander-Syro, A. et al., Nature 469, 189 (2011).Google Scholar
Delugas, P. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 166807 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diez, M. et al ., Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 016803 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shirane, G. and Yamada, Y., Phys. Rev. 177, 858 (1969).Google Scholar
Hurd, M., The Hall Effect in Metals and Alloys (Plenum, New York, 1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breitschaft, M. et al., Phys. Rev. B 81, 153414 (2010).Google Scholar
22. Smink, A. E. M. et al., arXiv:1610.02299 (2016).Google Scholar