Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:27:00.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Characterization of Thermal Behavior of Commercial NCR 18650B Batteries under Varying Cycling Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2017

Bo Dong*
Affiliation:
Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States.
Kazi Ahmed
Affiliation:
Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States.
Yige Li
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States. Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States.
Cengiz Sinan Ozkan
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States. Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States.
Mihrimah Ozkan
Affiliation:
Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States.
*
Get access

Abstract

To better understand the condition of commercial batteries used in Tesla EVs and stationary applications under real performing situations, this article focuses on tracking the temperature of commercial batteries during varying cycling conditions. We have found evidence of significant impact of cycling methods on batteries in ionic conductivity, inner impedance development, and structural change in both cathode and anode electrodes, which will be further analyzed by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy technique in the following research.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Armand, M. and Tarascon, J.-M., Nature. 451, 7 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodenough, J. B. and Park, K.-S., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 11671176 (2013).Google Scholar
Krieger, E. M., Cannarella, J. and Arnold, C. B., Energy. 60, 492500 (2013).Google Scholar
Lecce, D. D., Hu, T. and Hassoun, J., Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 693, 730737 (2017).Google Scholar
Smith, K. and Wang, C.-Y., J. Power Sources. 160, 662673 (2006).Google Scholar
Golubkov, A. W., Scheikl, S., Planteu, R., Voitic, G., Wiltsche, H., Stangl, C., Fauler, G., Thaler, A. and Hacker, V., RSC Adv. 5, 5717157186 (2015).Google Scholar
Ning, G., Haran, B. and Popov, B. N., J. Power Sources. 117, 160169 (2003).Google Scholar
Muenzel, V., Hollenkamp, A. F., Bhatt, A. I., de Hoog, J., Brazil, M., Thomas, D. A. and Mareels, I., J. Electrochem. Soc. 162, 15921600 (2015).Google Scholar
Hooper, J. M., Marco, J., Chouchelamane, G. H., Lyness, C. and Taylor, J., Energies. 9, 281 (2016).Google Scholar