Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T08:27:40.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Calcium Carbide Residue and Rice Husk Ash for improving the Compressive Strength of Compressed Earth Blocks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2018

Philbert Nshimiyimana ,
David Miraucourt ,
Adamah Messan  and
Luc Courard
Philbert Nshimiyimana*
Affiliation:
Institut International d’Ingénierie de l’Eau et de l’Environnement (2iE), Laboratoire Eco-Matériaux de Construction (LEMC), Rue de la Science, 01, BP 594 Ouagadougou 01, Burkina Faso. Université de Liège (ULiège), Urban and Environmental Engineering (UEE), Laboratoire des Matériaux de Construction (LMC), Allée de la Découverte, 9, 4000Liège, Belgique.
David Miraucourt
Affiliation:
Université de Liège (ULiège), Urban and Environmental Engineering (UEE), Laboratoire des Matériaux de Construction (LMC), Allée de la Découverte, 9, 4000Liège, Belgique.
Adamah Messan
Affiliation:
Institut International d’Ingénierie de l’Eau et de l’Environnement (2iE), Laboratoire Eco-Matériaux de Construction (LEMC), Rue de la Science, 01, BP 594 Ouagadougou 01, Burkina Faso.
Luc Courard
Affiliation:
Université de Liège (ULiège), Urban and Environmental Engineering (UEE), Laboratoire des Matériaux de Construction (LMC), Allée de la Découverte, 9, 4000Liège, Belgique.
*
*Corresponding author: Philbert Nshimiyimana, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Earth stabilization, using two by-products available in Burkina Faso: Calcium Carbide Residue (CCR) and Rice Husk Ash (RHA), improved the performance of compressed earth blocks (CEBs). The effect of adding CCR or CCR: RHA (in various ratios) to the clayey earth was investigated. CEBs were molded by manually compressing moisturized mixtures of earthen materials and 0-15 % CCR or CCR: RHA (various ratios) with respect to the weight of earthen material. The results showed that, with 15 % CCR: RHA in 7: 3 ratio, the compressive strength of CEBs (6.6 MPa) is three times that of the CEBs containing 15 % CCR alone (2.2 MPa). This improvement was related to the pozzolanic reaction between CCR, clay and RHA. These CEBs comply with the requirement for wall construction of two-storey housing.

Keywords

chemical reactionamorphousmixturesecond phasesstrength
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 3 , Issue 34-35: African Materials Research Society 2017 , 2018 , pp. 2009 - 2014
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ouedraogo, E., Coulibaly, O., Ouedraogo, A., and Messan, A., “Mechanical and Thermophysical Properties of Cement and/or Paper (Cellulose) Stabilized Compressed Clay Bricks,” J. Mater. Eng. Struct. 2, vol. 2, pp. 68–76, 2015.Google Scholar
Dao, K., Ouedraogo, M., Millogo, Y., Aubert, J.-E., and Gomina, M., “Thermal, hydric and mechanical behaviours of adobes stabilized with cement,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 158, pp. 84–96, 2018.Google Scholar
Reddy, B. V. V. and Hubli, S. R., “Properties of lime stabilised steam-cured blocks for masonry,” Mater. Struct., vol. 35, no. June, pp. 293–300, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houben, H. and Guillaud, H., CRATerre: Traité de Construction en Terre: L’encyclopédie de la construction en terre, Vol. I. Marseille: Editions Parathèses, 2006.Google Scholar
Sore, O. S., Messan, A., Prud, E., Escadeillas, G., and Tsobnang, F., “Synthesis and characterization of geopolymer binders based on local materials from Burkina Faso – Metakaolin and rice husk ash,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 124, pp. 301–311, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horpibulsuk, S., Phetchuay, C., Chinkulkijniwat, A., and Cholaphatsorn, A., “Strength development in silty clay stabilized with calcium carbide residue and fly ash,” Soils Found., vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 477–486, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardoso, F. A., Fernandes, H. C., Pileggi, R. G., Cincotto, M. A., and John, V. M., “Carbide lime and industrial hydrated lime characterization,” Powder Technol., vol. 195, no. 2, pp. 143–149, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reddy, B. D., Jyothy, S. A., Reddy, I. V. R., and Pradesh, A., “Effect of Rice Husk Ash on the Properties of Ordinary Portland Cement and Portland Slag Cement With and Without Superplasticiers,” Int. J. Civil, Struct. Environ. Infrastruct. Eng. Res. Dev., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 1–8, 2013.Google Scholar
Muthadhi, A. and Kothandaraman, S., “Optimum production conditions for reactive rice husk ash,” Mater. Struct., vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 1303–1315, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NF, P 94–056, Sols: reconnaissance et essais-Analyse granulométrique par tamisage à sec après lavage. Saint-Denis La Plaine Cedex: AFNor, 1996.Google Scholar
NF, P 94–057, Sols: reconnaissance et essais-Analyse granulométrique des sols-Méthode par sédimentation. Saint-Denis La Plaine Cedex: AFNor, 1992.Google Scholar
NF, P 94–051, Sols: reconnaissance et essais-Détermination des limites d’Atterberg-Limite de liquidité à la coupelle-Limite de plasticité au rouleau. Saint-Denis La Plaine Cedex: AFNor, 1993.Google Scholar
NF, P 94–093, Sols: reconnaissance et essais – Détermination des références de compactage d’un matériau - Essai Proctor normal - Essai Proctor modifié. Saint-Denis La Plaine Cedex: AFNor, 1999.Google Scholar
Michel, F. and Courard, L., “Particle Size Distribution of Limestone Fillers: Granulometry and Specific Surface Area Investigations,” Part. Sci. Technol., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 334–340, Jul. 2014.Google Scholar
Brunauer, S., Emmett, P. H., and Teller, E., “Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers,” J. Am. Chem. Soc., vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 309–319, 1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehta, P. K., “Siliceous ashes and hydraulic cements prepared therefrom, US Patent, US4105459 A, 1978.Google Scholar
XP, P 13–901, Blocs de terre comprimée pour murs et cloisons, Définitions-Spécifications-Méthodes d’essais-Conditions de réception, Saint-Denis La Plaine Cedex: AFNor, 2011.Google Scholar
Földvári, M., Handbook of the thermogravimetric system of minerals and its use in geological practice, vol. 213. Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 2011.Google Scholar
Houben, H., Boubekeur, S., Doat, P., D’Ornano, S., Douline, A., Garnier, P., Guillaud, H., Joffroy, T., and Rigassi, V., Eds., Compressed Earth Blocks: Standards. Brussels-Belgium: CDI & CRATerre-EAG, 1998.Google Scholar