Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:25:56.061Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Apparent contradiction between calculated kinetic and potential energy fractions of phonons in molecular solids with implications on condensed-phase chemistry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2017

Brent Kraczek*
Affiliation:
Computational and Information Sciences Directorate, US Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005
*
Get access

Abstract

Many computational and experimental analyses of molecular excitation rely on relative atomic velocities to identify the excitation of chemical bonds. These are often interpreted through the aid of normal mode calculations. We address two potential gaps in this approach: 1. Relative velocities may not reflect the total potential energy absorbed by the bond. 2. Normal mode calculations omit interactions between neighboring molecules, effectively assuming a similarity between condensed- and gas-phase chemistry. Phonon calculations implicitly include interactions between neighboring molecules and allow analyses of both relative velocities and potential energies in solids.In the present work, we compare kinetic and potential energy fractions of the phonon modes of the molecular solids nitromethane and β-HMX. We show that velocity-based methods are likely sufficient to analyze nitromethane. However, they cannot detect the majority of excitation ofthe N-N bonds in β-HMX, the scission of which appears to begin major decomposition pathways in the molecules.In the broader context of condensed-phase chemistry, this implies that important interactions may not all be identifiable through analyses that rely solely on relative atomic velocities.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Kraczek, B. and Chung, P., J. Chem. Phys. 138, 074505 (2013).Google Scholar
Chakraborty, D. et al., J. Phys. Chem. A 104, 2261 (2000).Google Scholar
Ashcroft, N. W. and Mermin, N. D., Solid State Physics, Saunders College Publishing, Fort Worth, TX.Google Scholar
Maradudin, A. A. et al., Theory of Lattice Dynamics in the Harmonic Approximation, 2nd ed., Academic Press, New York, 1971.Google Scholar
Sorescu, D. C., et al., J. Phys. Chem. B 104, 8406 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, G. D. and Bharadwaj, R. K., J. Phys. Chem. B 103, 3570 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tukey, J., Exploratory Data Analysis, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA (1977).Google Scholar
Cavagnat, D. et al., Phys. Rev. Lett.54, 193 (1985).Google Scholar
Chakraborty, D. et al., J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 1302 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rom, N. et al., J. Phys. Chem. A 115, 10181 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar