Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:11:07.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An enzymatic glucose detection sensor using ZnO nanostructure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2016

Mohammed Marie ,
Sanghamitra Mandal  and
Omar Manasreh
Mohammed Marie*
Affiliation:
Microelectronics and Photonics graduate program, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, U.S.A.
Sanghamitra Mandal
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, U.S.A.
Omar Manasreh
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701, U.S.A.
*
*(Email: [email protected])

Abstract:

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Glucose sensor based on ITO/ZnO NRs/GOx/nafion is fabricated and tested under different glucose concentrations. Hydrothermal growth method along with sol-gel technique is used to grow high quality ZnO nanorods that have well-alignment and high density with an acceptable aspect ratio. The as-grown of ZnO nanorods are used to fabricate a working electrode that can be used for glucose detection in blood after a modification process with GOx and nafion membrane. Annealing at 110 °C helped in improves the crystallinity of the seed layer and as a result, a high density and well alignment as-grown ZnO nanorods were obtained. High sensitivity and short response time were obtained from the fabricated device with an acceptable lower limit of detection.

Keywords

sol-gelhydrothermalnanostructure
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 1 , Issue 13: Nanomaterials and Synthesis , 2016 , pp. 847 - 853
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

References

References:

Shafer-Peltier, E., Haynes, L., Glucksberg, R., and Van Duyne, P., J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 125, 2 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alwarappan, S., Liu, C., Kumar, A., and Li, Chen-Zhong, J. Phys. Chem. C. 114, 30 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, X., Xu, H, Wang, X., Huang, Y., Chan-Park, M., Zhang, H., Wang, L., Huang, W., and Chen, P., Journal of the American Chemical Society. 6, 4(2012).Google Scholar
Parka, S., Park, S., Jeong, R., Boo, H., Park, J., Kimc, H., and Chung, T., Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 31 (2012).Google Scholar
Liu, Y., Deng, C., Tang, L., Qin, A., Hu, R., Sun, J., and Tang, B., Journal of the American Chemical Society. 133 (2011).Google Scholar
Schmelzeisen-Redeker, G., Staib, A., Strasser, M., Müller, U., and Schoemaker, M., Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology. 7, 4(2013).Google Scholar
Zhou, C., Xu, L., Song, J., Xing, R., Xu, S., Liu, D., and Song, H., Scientific report nature journal. 4, 7382(2014).Google Scholar
Zhai, D., Liu, B., Shi, Y., Pan, L., Wang, Y., Li, W., Zhang, R., and Yu, G., American Chemical society. 7, 4(2013).Google Scholar
Yin, Y., Que, W., and Kam, C., Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology. 53, 3(2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, J., Trügler, A., Jakab, A., Hohenester, U., C. and Sonnichsen, Plasmonics. 5, 2 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahmad, R., Tripathy, N., Kim, J., and Hahn, Y., Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical. 174 (2012).Google Scholar
Yang, J., Zhang, W., and Gunasekarana, S., Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 26(2010).Google Scholar
Zhanga, Y., Sub, L., Manuzzi, D., Valdes, H.Monteros, E., Jia, W., Huoa, D., Houa, C., and Lei, Y., Biosensors and Bioelectronics. 31 (2012).Google Scholar