Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:57:53.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

XRPD and Scanning Electron Microscopy of Alloys of the CuAlS2 – CuFeS2 System Prepared by Thermobaric Treatment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2018

Barys Korzun  and
Anatoly Pushkarev
Barys Korzun*
Affiliation:
The City University of New York,Borough of Manhattan Community College, 199 Chambers St., New York, NY 10007, U.S.A
Anatoly Pushkarev
Affiliation:
Scientific-Practical Materials Research Centre of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, 19 P. Brovki, Minsk220072, Belarus
*
*(Email: [email protected])
Get access

Abstract

Alloys of the CuAlS2 – CuFeS2 system were prepared by thermobaric treatment at high pressure of 5.5 GPa and temperatures ranging from 573 to 1573 K and phase formation in the system was investigated using X-ray powder diffraction, optical microscopy and scanning electron microscopy equipped with energy dispersive spectroscopy. The unit-cell parameters (the lattice constants and the unit-cell volume) were computed as a function of the composition. Absence of complete solubility in the (CuAlS2)1-x-(CuFeS2)x system was established. Formation of solid solutions with the tetragonal structure of chalcopyrite was detected for compositions with the molar part of CuFeS2 x not exceeding 0.10.

Keywords

alloyscanning electron microscopy (SEM)x-ray diffraction (XRD)
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 3 , Issue 56: Energy Materials and Technologies , 2018 , pp. 3323 - 3328
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Best Research-Cell Efficiencies. United States of America: National Renewable Energy Laboratory, 2014.Google Scholar
Shay, J.L., Wernick, J.H., Ternary Chalcopyrite Semiconductors: Growth, Electronic Properties, and Applications, Pergamon Press, First Edition, 1975, 243 p.Google Scholar
Syrbu, N.N., Korzun, B.V., Fadzeyeva, A.A., Mianzelen, R.R., Ursaki, V.V., Galbic, I., Physica B, 405, 3243 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kazmerski, L.L., Tech. Digest 12th PVSEC, 2001, p. 11, Cheju, South Korea.Google Scholar
Kradinova, L.V., Polubotko, A.M., Popov, V.V., Prochukhan, V.D., Rud, Yu.V., Skorukin, V.E., Sov. Phys. Semicond. 8, 1616 (1993).Google Scholar
Austin, I.G., Goodman, C.H.L., Pengelly, A.E., J. Electrochem. Soc. 103, 609 (1956).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondo, K., Teranishi, T., Sato, K., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 36, 311 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teranishi, T., Sato, K., Kondo, K., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 36, 1618 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkat, L., Hamdadou, N., Morsli, M., Kheli, A., Bernede, J.C., J. Cryst. Crowth 297, 426 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yund, R.A., Kullerud, G., J. Petrology 7, Part 3, 454 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korzun, B.V., Fadzeyeva, A.A., Unuchak, D.M., Kloess, G., Hoebler, H.-J., Schmitz, W., Bente, K., Abstracts of “Deutsche Kristallzuchtungstagung 2008” (March 5-7, 2008, Munich, Germany) (2008).Google Scholar
Buerger, M.J., Am. Mineralogist, 30, 469 (1945).Google Scholar
Schlegel, H., Schuller, A., Freiberger Forschungshefte B 1952, 2, 1–31.Google Scholar
Frueh, A.J. Jr., J. Geology, 66, 218 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yund, R.A., Kullerud, G., J. Petrology, 7, 454 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacLean, W.H., Cabri, L.J., Gill, J.E., Can. J. Earth Sci., 9, 1305 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar