Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T09:17:28.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Magnetocaloric Improvements in Doped Heusler Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2017

Michael V. McLeod
Affiliation:
Materials Department, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM87801
Bhaskar S. Majumdar*
Affiliation:
Materials Department, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM87801
Zafer Turgut
Affiliation:
Air Force Research Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, OH45433USA
*
Get access

Abstract

Magnetocaloric materials have gained significant interest as an environment friendly and efficient refrigeration technology. We have been working on Heusler alloys, primarily the Ni-Mn-Ga system for improved magnetocaloric effect (MCE). We have observed significant MCE increase in stress assisted thermally cycled samples and demonstrated that one primary mechanism is texture change. More recently, we have observed volumetric decrease as well as anisotropy changes due to stressed cycling. The influence of these parameters on magnetic anisotropy and MCE are discussed. We have also utilized isoelectronic Al substitution at the Ga lattice sites for optimizing atomic distances and exchange interactions in an effort to bring about magnetostructural transformation closer to room temperature (RT) while retaining high MCE. The results show that Al substitutions can bring about large decreases (50 – 70K) in both the Curie (TC) and martensite start (Ms) temperatures, and permit fine tuning the magnetostructural transformation temperature.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Gschneidner, K.A., et al. ., Reports on Progress in Physics, 68(6): p.1479 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franco, V., et al. ., The Annual Review of Materials Research, 42 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Planes, A., Manosa, L., and Acet, M., Journal of Physics-Condensed Matter, 21(23) (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, M.V., et al. ., Acta Materialia, 97: p. 245256 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pecharsky, V.K. and Gschneidner, K.A., Physical Review Letters, 78 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provenzano, V., Shapiro, A.J., and Shull, R.D., Nature, 429(853) (2005).Google Scholar
Jia, L., et al. ., Journal of Applied Physics, 100(12) (2006).Google Scholar
Yue, M., et al. ., Chinese Physics B, 24(1) (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giri, A.K., et al. ., Journal of Applied Physics, 17A907(17) (2013).Google Scholar
Ye, B., Majumdar, B.S., and Dutta, I., Acta Materialia, 57(8): p. 24032417 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krenke, T., et al. ., Physical Review B, 73(17): p. 10 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubenko, I., et al. ., Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 383, p.186 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullity, B.D. and Graham, C.D., Second Edition (2009).Google Scholar
Hadjipanayis, G., Sellmyer, D.J., and Brandt, B., Physical Review B, 23(7): p. 3349 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chikazumi, S., Oxford University Press Inc., New York (1997).Google Scholar
Buchelnikov, V.D., et al. ., Physical Review B, 81(9) (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar