Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:42:32.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leaching of Nirex Reference Vault Backfill cement by clay, granite and saline groundwaters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2018

Rita G. W. Vasconcelos ,
Andres Idiart ,
Neil C. Hyatt ,
John L. Provis  and
Claire L. Corkhill
Rita G. W. Vasconcelos
Affiliation:
NucleUS Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Sheffield (UK)
Andres Idiart
Affiliation:
Amphos 21, Barcelona (ES)
Neil C. Hyatt
Affiliation:
NucleUS Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Sheffield (UK)
John L. Provis
Affiliation:
NucleUS Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Sheffield (UK)
Claire L. Corkhill*
Affiliation:
NucleUS Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Sheffield (UK)
*
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

For the UK geological disposal facility (GDF) concept in a high strength crystalline rock, Nirex Reference Vault Backfill (NRVB) has been considered to use as a cementitious backfill material. The lifetime performance of this high pH material is required to be extremely long, and as a consequence of the interaction with the geological environment (e.g. groundwater), the backfill material will evolve and age with time. In this paper, we present the results of a leaching experiment, where NRVB is placed in contact with three different groundwater compositions representative of granitic, clay and saline groundwater for 35 days. Some differences were observed related with the mineralogy. X-ray Diffraction results showed the formation of more ettringite, mainly in the NRVB samples leached in clay and saline groundwater. An increase of the pH was also observed in the NRVB samples leached with the three different ground waters, being these results in accordance with the reactive transport modelling performed.

Keywords

cement & ampconcretenuclear materialswaste managementchemical composition
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 3 , Issue 21: Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XLI , 2018 , pp. 1175 - 1180
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

Radioactive Waste Management (2015). Geological Disposal: The 2013 Derived Inventory. Report no. NDA/RWM/120.Google Scholar
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (2010a). Geological Disposal: Generic Disposal Facility Designs. Report no. NDA/RWMD/048.Google Scholar
Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (2010b). Geological Disposal: Near-Field Evolution Status Report. Report no. NDA/RWMD/033.Google Scholar
Francis, A. J., Cather, R., and Crossland, I. G. (1997). Nirex Safety Assessment Research Programme: Development of the Nirex Reference Vault Backfill; Report on Current Status in 1994. Report no: S/97/014.Google Scholar
Vasconcelos, R.G.W, Beaudoin, N., Hamilton, A., Hyatt, N.C., Provis, J.L., Corkhill, C.L. (2018). Characterisation of a high pH cement backfill for the geological disposal of nuclear waste: The Nirex Reference Vault Backfill. Appl. Geochem. 89, 180 – 189.Google Scholar
Gascoyne, M. (2002). Influence of grout and cement on groundwater composition. POSIVA Working Report 2002-07, Posiva Oy.Google Scholar
Vinsot, A., Mettler, S., and Wechner, S. (2008). In situ characterization of the Callovo-Oxfordian pore water composition. Phys. Chem. Earth, vol. 33, no. SUPPL. 1.Google Scholar