Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:56:00.986Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intlp compounds for Underwater Solar Energy Harvesting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2018

Ahmed Zayan  and
Thomas E. Vandervelde
Ahmed Zayan
Affiliation:
Renewable Energy and Applied Photonics Laboratory, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Tufts UniversityMedford, Massachusetts 02155, USA
Thomas E. Vandervelde*
Affiliation:
Renewable Energy and Applied Photonics Laboratory, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department Tufts UniversityMedford, Massachusetts 02155, USA
*
*[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

With the rising interest in oceanic monitoring, climate awareness and surveillance, the scientific community need for developing autonomous, self-sustaining Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs) increased as well. Limitations on the size, maneuverability, power consumption, and available on-site maintenance of these UUVs make a number of proposed technologies to power them harder to implement than others; solar energy harvesting stands as one of the more promising candidates to address the need for a long-term energy supply for UUVs due to its relatively small size and ease of deployment. Studies show research groups focusing on the use of Si cells (amorphous and crystalline), InGaP, and more recently Organic Photovoltaics to convert the attenuated solar spectrum under shallow depths (no deeper than 9.1 m) into electrical energy used or stored by the UUV’s power management system (P. P. Jenkins et al. 2014; Walters et al. 2015). In our study, we consider the ternary compound In1-xTlxP that allows for varying the quantum efficiency of the cell, and by extension the overall harvesting efficiency of the system by altering the Tl content (x) in the compound. In1-xTlxP on InP is a low strain system since the compound exhibits very little change in its lattice constant with changing Tl content due to the comparable atomic size and forces of In and Tl allowing for relatively easy growth on InP substrates. The study focuses on studying the spectral response and comparing the performance of an optimized single junction In1-xTlxP cells to In1-yGayP cells while accounting for the optical losses of the solar irradiance underwater for various depths.

Keywords

photovoltaicelectronic structureenergy generation
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 3 , Issue 3: Electronics, Magnetics and Photonics , 2018 , pp. 153 - 158
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Stachiw, J. D., “Performance of Photovoltaic Cells in Undersea Environment,” Journal of Engineering for Industry, 102 (1), 51–59 (1980).Google Scholar
Rosa-Clot, M., Rosa-Clot, P., Tina, G. M., and Scandura, P. F., “Submerged photovoltaic solar panel: SP2,” Renewable Energy, 35 (8), 1862–1865 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clot, M. R., Rosa-Clot, P., and Tina, G. M., “Submerged PV Solar Panel for Swimming Pools: SP3,” Energy Procedia, 134 (Supplement C), 567–576 (2017).Google Scholar
Tina, G. M., Rosa-Clot, M., Rosa-Clot, P., and Scandura, P. F., “Optical and thermal behavior of submerged photovoltaic solar panel: SP2,” Energy, 39 (1), 17–26 (2012).Google Scholar
Lanzafame, R., Nachtmann, S., Rosa-Clot, M., Rosa-Clot, P., Scandura, P. F., Taddei, S., and Tina, G. M., “Field Experience With Performances Evaluation of a Single-Crystalline Photovoltaic Panel in an Underwater Environment,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 57 (7), 2492–2498 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, R. J., Yoon, W., Placencia, D., Scheiman, D., Lumb, M. P., Strang, A., Stavrinou, P. N., and Jenkins, P. P.., “Multijunction organic photovoltaic cells for underwater solar power,” in 2015 IEEE 42nd Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC) Proceedings, New Orleans, LA, 1–3 (2015).Google Scholar
Jenkins, P. P., Messenger, S., Trautz, K. M., Maximenko, S. I., Goldstein, D., Scheiman, D., Hoheisel, R., and Walters, R. J., “High-Bandgap Solar Cells for Underwater Photovoltaic Applications,” IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 4 (1), 202–207 (2014).Google Scholar
van Schilfgaarde, M., Chen, A., Krishnamurthy, S., and Sher, A.., “InTlP — a proposed infrared detector material InTlP — a proposed infrared detector material,” Applied Physics Letters, 65 (21), 65–68 (1994).Google Scholar
Schwarz, K., Blaha, P., and Madsen, G. K. H., “Electronic structure calculations of solids using the WIEN2k package for material sciences,” Computer Physics Communications 147 (1-2), 71–76 (2002).Google Scholar
Schwarz, K. and Blaha, P., “Solid state calculations using WIEN2k” Computational Materials Science, 28(2), 259–273 (2003).Google Scholar
Tran, F., Laskowski, R., Blaha, P., and Schwarz, K., “Performance on molecules, surfaces, and solids of the Wu-Cohen GGA exchange-correlation energy functional,” Physics Review B, 75, (11-15), 1–14 (2007).Google Scholar
Zayan, A., Stevens, M., and Vandervelde, T. E., “GaAsBi alloys for photovoltaic and thermophotovoltaic applications,” in 2016 IEEE 43rd Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), Portland, OR, 2839–2843 (2016).Google Scholar
Zayan, A., Downs, C., and Vandervelde, T. E., “GaTlP - A Novel Semiconductor for Thermophotovoltaic Applications,” 29th Europrean Photovoltaic Solor Energy Conference (EUPVSEC) Proceedings, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 280–283 (2014).Google Scholar
Joshi, K. B., Costello, J. H., and Priya, S., “Estimation of Solar Energy Harvested for Autonomous Jellyfish Vehicles (AJVs),” IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 36 (4), 539–551 (2011).Google Scholar