Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T07:57:05.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Heterogeneous photo–Fenton treatment for degradation of indigo carmine dye

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2019

Ismael Cosme-Torres
Affiliation:
Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Toluca, Av. Tecnológico s/n, Colonia Agrícola Bellavista, C.P. 52149, Metepec, México
María Guadalupe Macedo-Miranda*
Affiliation:
Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Toluca, Av. Tecnológico s/n, Colonia Agrícola Bellavista, C.P. 52149, Metepec, México
Sonia Mireya Martinez-Gallegos
Affiliation:
Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Toluca, Av. Tecnológico s/n, Colonia Agrícola Bellavista, C.P. 52149, Metepec, México
Julio Cesar González-Juárez
Affiliation:
Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Toluca, Av. Tecnológico s/n, Colonia Agrícola Bellavista, C.P. 52149, Metepec, México
Gabriela Roa-Morales
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Facultad de Química, Paseo Colón intersección Paseo Tollocan s/n, C.P. 50120, Toluca, México
Francisco Javier Illescas-Martínez
Affiliation:
Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Toluca, Av. Tecnológico s/n, Colonia Agrícola Bellavista, C.P. 52149, Metepec, México
Pedro Ibarra-Escutia
Affiliation:
Tecnológico Nacional de México/Instituto Tecnológico de Toluca, Av. Tecnológico s/n, Colonia Agrícola Bellavista, C.P. 52149, Metepec, México
*
Get access

Abstract

The catalyst ZeoSonFe(M1), mixed with hydrogen peroxide and UV light, presented the highest degradation percent within 120 minutes of treatment respect to ZeoSonFe(M2), ZeoSonFe(M3) and ZeoSonFe(M4) which accounted for 72.92, 84.27, and 72.30 %, respectively. The spectrum of UV-Vis degradation showed that the absorption main bands of IC (612 and 286 nm) decrease due to the rupture of C=C bond that belong to the chromophorous group IC. The catalyst ZeoSonFe(M1) was characterized with infrared (FTIR), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and pore diameter analysis with the BET method. To describe the kinetics of the oxidative reaction the pseudo first order model was applied.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

Hernández-Gordillo, A., Rodríguez-González, V., Oros-Ruiz, S. and Gómez, R.. Catalysis Today. 266, 27-35 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arenas, C.N., Vasco, A., Betancur, M. and Martinez, J.D.. Process Safety and Environmental Protection.106, 224-238 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boczkaj, G. and Fernandes, A.. Chemical Engineering Journal. 320, 608-633 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagol, M., Przyjazny, A. and Boczkaj, G.. Chemical Engineering Journal. 338, 599-627 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasiri, M.B., Aleboyeh, H. and Aleboyeh, A.. Environmental Technology. 31(2), 165-173 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macedo, M.G. and Olguín, M.T.. J Incl Phenom Macrocycl Chem. 59, 131-142 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhardwaj, D., Sharma, M., Sharma, P. and Tomar, R.. J. Hazard. Mater. 227-228: 292-300 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Othman, I., Mohamed, R.M., Ibrahim, I.A. and Mohamed, M.M.. Applied Catalysis A: General. 299, 95-102 D. (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serrano-Ruiz, , Flores-Acosta, M., Barajas-Conde, E. and Rosales-Ramirez, D.. J. Mol. Struct. 980. 149-155 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tito-Ferro, D., Rodríguez-Iznaga, I., Concepción-Rosabal, B., Chávez-Rivas, F., Petranoskii, V., Penton-Madrigal, A. and Castillón-Barraza, F. Instituto Superior Minero Metalúrgico de Moa, Vol. 32 ,1-16. (2016).Google Scholar
Aleboyeh, A., Moussa, Y. and Aleboyeh, H.. Dyes and Pigments. 66, 129-134 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Y., Klamerth, N., Ayala, P.C. and El-Din, M.G.. Chemosphere. 175,178-185 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noya, C., De León, A., Sergio, M. and Bussi, J.. Advances in science and engineering. 2(4), 35-45 (2011).Google Scholar
Sreeja, P.H. and Sosamony, K.J.. Procedia Technology. 24, 217-223 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Queirós, S., Morais, V., Rodrígues, C.S.D., Maldonado-Hódar, F.J. and Madeira, L.M.. Separation and Purification Technology. 141, 235-245 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quadrado, R.F.N. and Fajardo, A.R.. Carbohydrate Polymers. 177, 443-450 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirajudheen, P. and Meenakshi, S.. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 133, 253-261 (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernal, M., Romero, R., Roa, G., Barrera, C.D., Torres, T.B. and Natividad, R.. International Journal of Photoenergy. 1-7 (2013).Google Scholar