Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T03:32:39.551Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Glass Material Modeling and its Molding Behavior

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Gang Liu ,
Anh-Tuan Vu ,
Olaf Dambon  and
Fritz Klocke
Gang Liu
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer Institute for Production Technology IPT, Aachen, Germany
Anh-Tuan Vu
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer Institute for Production Technology IPT, Aachen, Germany
Olaf Dambon*
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer Institute for Production Technology IPT, Aachen, Germany
Fritz Klocke
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer Institute for Production Technology IPT, Aachen, Germany
*
*(Email: [email protected])
Get access

Abstract

Precision molding is a replicative production method for the mass production of complex glass optics in high precision. In contrast to the traditional material removal process, such as grinding and polishing, the surface as well as the entire shape of the optical component is created by deforming glass at elevated temperatures using precise molding tools with optical surfaces. The molded glass components present high shape accuracy and surface finish after the molding process, therefore no further processing is required. During the molding process, the glass is heated in the molding tool up to above the transition temperature Tg, then pressed into desired shape and cooled down to approximately 200 °C. The precision glass molding is therefore a complex thermo-mechanical process, in which the glass lens undergoes uneven cooling speed and stress distribution. These lead to several drawbacks on the molded glass optics, such as form deviation, index change and fracture. In this study, FEM simulation was employed in order to achieve preliminary understanding of the molding process. The FEM model included viscoelasticity behavior of glass material (stress-relaxation, structure-relaxation and thermos-rheological simplicity), as well as thermodynamics model of the molding machine. In the form of a case study of a real molding example, the form deviation, index change and fracture of the molded glass optic were predicted in advance of the molding experiment by means of the numerical calculation of thermal shrinkage, volume change and stress distribution respectively. The good agreement between simulation results and molding experiment results proves the accuracy of the developed FEM model.

Keywords

viscoelasticitysimulationoptical properties
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 2 , Issue 16: Processing and Manufacturing , 2017 , pp. 875 - 885
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Fotheringham, U., Baltes, A., Fischer, P., Höhn, P., Jedamzik, R., Schenk, C., Stolz, C. and Westenberger, G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91, 780 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollstegge, D., PhD. Thesis, RWTH Aachen University, 2016.Google Scholar
Gy, R., Duffrène, L. and Labrot, M., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 175, 103 (1994).Google Scholar
Narayanaswamy, O. S., J. Am. Cerum. Soc. 71, 900 (1988).Google Scholar
Williams, M. L., Landel, R. F. and Ferry, J. D., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 77, 3701 (1955).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, G. W., Relaxation in Glass and Composites, (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1986), p. 117.Google Scholar
Narayanaswamy, O. S., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 54, 491 (1971).Google Scholar
Su, L. and Yi, A., Int. J. Appl. Glass Sci. 3, 263 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, F., PhD. Thesis, RWTH Aachen University, 2013.Google Scholar
Klocke, F., Manufacturing Processes 4: Forming, (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008), p. 122.Google Scholar
Griffith, A., 221, 163, (1921) [Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 221, 163(1921)].Google Scholar
Thornton, J. I. and Cashman, P. J., J. Forensic. Sci. 31, 818 (1986).Google Scholar
ASTM Committee, ASTM C1683-10, 2010.Google Scholar
Friedrichs, M., Dukwen, J., Liu, G., Tang, M., Dambon, O. and Klocke, F., Wear 364, 144 (2016).Google Scholar