Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:28:52.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The evaluation of the composition dependence of fracture toughness of Al3Nb alloys by using micro-size fracture testing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2017

Nobuhiro Matsuzaki*
Affiliation:
Division of Materials Science and Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8628, Japan.
Ken-ichi Ikeda
Affiliation:
Division of Materials Science and Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8628, Japan.
Seiji Miura
Affiliation:
Division of Materials Science and Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8628, Japan.
Nobuaki Sekido
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8579, Japan.
Takahito Ohmura
Affiliation:
National Institute for Materials Science, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0047, Japan.
*
(Email: [email protected])
Get access

Abstract

Al3Nb is known as a high oxidation resistant material, while it is quite brittle. As the fracture toughness of Al3Nb single crystal and its dependence on the composition are not obtained, the micro-sized fracture testing proposed by Suzuki et al. was performed. Al3Nb single crystal micron-order size cantilevers with a chevron-notch were fabricated in a grain of two-phase polycrystalline alloys by using FIB (Focused Ion Beam). From the load-displacement curves during the bending by a nanoindenter, the average value of fracture toughness of Nb-rich Al3Nb is evaluated to be 2.90 MPam1/2, while the fracture toughness of Al-rich Al3Nb is also evaluated to be 2.82 MPam1/2. From this result, the fracture toughness of Al3Nb is less dependent on its Al/Nb ratio. Furthermore the fracture toughness of Al3 (Nb, V) was evaluated to be 2.82 MPam1/2.The fracture toughness of Al3Nb is seemingly insensitive to V addition.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Graduate Student

References

REFERENCES

Kim, W., Tanaka, H., Kasama, A., Tanaka, R. and Hanada, S., Intermetallics, 9, 521 (2001).Google Scholar
Tan, Y., Tanaka, H., Ma, C., Kasama, A., Tanaka, R., Mishima, Y. and Hanada, S., J. Japan. Inst. Metals, 64, 559 (2000).Google Scholar
Aylmore, D.W., Gregg, S.J. and Jepson, W. B., J. Electoche. Soc, 106, 1010 (1959).Google Scholar
Hayashi, T. and Maruyama, T., J. Japan Inst. Metals. 64, 1062 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reip, C.P. and Sauthoff, G., Intermetallics, 1, 159 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneibel, J.H., Becher, P.F. and Horton, J.A., J. Mater. Res, 3, 1272 (1988).Google Scholar
Maio, D. D. and Roberts, S. G., J. Mater. Res, 20, 299(2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matoy, K., Schönherr, H., Detzel, T., Schöberl, T., Pippan, R., Motz, C. and Dehm, G., Thin Solid Films, 518, 247(2009).Google Scholar
Suzuki, S., Sekido, N., Ohmura, T. and Miura, S., MRS Proceedings, 1760 (2015).Google Scholar
Guzei, L.S., Ternary Alloys,VCH, 7, 399 (1993).Google Scholar
Brinckmann, S., Kirchlechner, C. and Dehm, G., Scripta. Mater, 127, 76(2017).Google Scholar
Suzuki, S., Miura, S., Sekido, N. and Ohmura, T., unpublished work.Google Scholar
Chen, Z., Zhang, P., Chen, D., Wu, Y., Wang, M., Ma, N. and Wang, H., J. Appl. Phys, 117, 085904(2015).Google Scholar
Hosoda, H., Sato, T., Tezuka, H., Mishima, Y., Inoue, K., Kamio, A. and Shinoda, T., J. Jpn. Inst. Light Met. 44, 675 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, K.W., Ipser, H., Metallkd, Z., 91, 383 (2000).Google Scholar