Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:18:43.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of the Metallic Aging on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Titanium Alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2017

T.J. Sánchez-Rosas*
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad -Azcapotzalco. Av. San Pablo No. 180. Col. Reynosa Tamaulipas México Distrito Federal, C.P. 02200.
J.D. Muñoz-Andrade
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad -Azcapotzalco. Av. San Pablo No. 180. Col. Reynosa Tamaulipas México Distrito Federal, C.P. 02200.
M. Aguilar-Sánchez
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad -Azcapotzalco. Av. San Pablo No. 180. Col. Reynosa Tamaulipas México Distrito Federal, C.P. 02200.
B. Vargas-Arista
Affiliation:
Instituto Tecnológico de Tlalnepantla. División de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación. Av. Instituto Tecnológico s/n. Col. La comunidad. Tlalnepantla de Baz Estado de México, C.P. 54070.
E. Garfias-García
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Unidad -Azcapotzalco. Av. San Pablo No. 180. Col. Reynosa Tamaulipas México Distrito Federal, C.P. 02200.
Get access

Abstract

Different aging heat treatments were performed in a Titanium alloy using as aging media metallic baths in comparison to typical furnace aging. As a first step, a Duplex Aging (DA) consisted of solubilization followed by quenching to room temperature after aging heat treatment in different metallic baths (Zn, Sn and Bi). A second procedure was Alternative Aging (AA) which consisted of solubilization and direct aging inside three different aforementioned baths. Microstructural aging variations begins at half hour until 30 h at 550°C inside metallic bath of Zn, Sn or Bi. Both kinds of aging promoted a microstructural variation and so on microhardness values. Microstructural analysis by Optical Microscopy showed a structural refinement after AA treatment. The highest hardness value of 375 HVN was achieved in Alternative Aging with Zn bath, which was found to be dependent on laminar α phase refining. Moreover, after AA treatment for 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 10 and 30 h at 550°C in the metallic bath of Zn and Sn, the results indicated similar hardness values in different times, resulting in the fastest kinetic for Sn metallic bath at 2 h compared to that 4 h in Zn metallic bath. The observed increase in micro-hardness is not very attractive, it is recommended to use large aging times in order to stabilize final spacing of microstructural features in AA treatment.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Rack, H. J., Titanium alloys for biomedical applications, USA. Materials Science & Engineering, 1269-1277 (2006).Google Scholar
Nunes, R., Properties and Selection: Nonferrous Alloys and Special-Purpose Materials, ASM Handbook, 1770-1774 (1990).Google Scholar
Marchetti, G. E., Biomateriales en cirugía Ortopédica, Elsevier Masson., 10-24 (2010).Google Scholar
Reda, R., Journal of Metallurgical Engineering, 2, 4854 (2013).Google Scholar
Contributors, H. K., Mechanical Testing and Evaluation, 8, 162174 (2000).Google Scholar
Morita, T., Japan Institute of metals: Materials Transactions, 46, 16811686 (2005).Google Scholar
ASTM F-136 Standard specification for wrought titanium-6Aluminium-4Vanadium ELI (Extra Low Interstitial) for surgical implant applications. USA 2013.Google Scholar
ASTM E-384 International, Standard Test Methods for Vickers Hardness of Metallic Materials, USA, 2003, pp. 309–314.Google Scholar
Reda, R., Metallography, Microstructure and Analysis, 388-393 (2013).Google Scholar
Filip, R., Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 133, 8489 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar