Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T10:51:54.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Capillary Forces Described by Effective Contact Angle Distributions via Simulations of the Centrifuge Technique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2016

Myles Thomas
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering, Purdue University, 480 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2100, U.S.A.
Elizabeth Krenek
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering, Purdue University, 480 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2100, U.S.A.
Stephen Beaudoin*
Affiliation:
School of Chemical Engineering, Purdue University, 480 Stadium Mall Drive, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2100, U.S.A.
*
Get access

Abstract

Understanding particle adhesion is vital to any industry where particulate systems are involved. There are multiple factors that affect the strength of the adhesion force, including the physical properties of the interacting materials and the system conditions. Surface roughness on the particles and the surfaces to which they adhere, including roughness at the nanoscale, is critically important to the adhesion force. The focus of this work is on the capillary force that dominates the adhesion whenever condensed moisture is present. Theoretical capillary forces were calculated for smooth particles adhered to smooth and rough surfaces. Simulations of the classical centrifuge technique used to describe particle adhesion to surfaces were performed based on these forces. A model was developed to describe the adhesion of the particles to the rough surface in terms of the adhesion to a smooth surface and an ‘effective’ contact angle distribution.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Litster, J. and Bryan, Ennis, The Science and Engineering of Granulation Processes. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2004.Google Scholar
Beaudoin, S., Jaiswal, P., Harrison, A., Laster, J., Smith, K., Sweat, M., and Thomas, M., “Fundamental forces in particle adhesion,” in Particle Adhesion and Removal, Mittal, K. L. and Jaiswal, R., Eds. Beverly, MA: Wiley-Scrivener, 2015, pp. 179.Google Scholar
Zimon, A. D., Adhesion of Dust and Powder, 2nd Edn. New York: Consultants Bureau, 1982.Google Scholar
Sedin, D. L. and Rowlen, K. L., “Adhesion forces measured by atomic force microscopy in humid air,” Anal. Chem., vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 21832189, 2000.Google Scholar
Cooper, K., Gupta, A., and Beaudoin, S., “Substrate Morphology and Particle Adhesion in Reacting Systems.,” J. Colloid Interface Sci., vol. 228, no. 2, pp. 213219, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M. C. and Beaudoin, S. P., “An Enhanced Centrifuge-Based Approach to Powder Characterization: Particle Size and Hamaker Constant Determination,” Powder Technol., vol. 286, pp. 412419, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ata, A., Rabinovich, Y., and Singh, R., “Role of surface roughness in capillary adhesion,” J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 337346, 2002.Google Scholar
Galvin, K. P., “A conceptually simple derivation of the Kelvin equation,” Chem. Eng. Sci., vol. 60, no. 16, pp. 46594660, 2005.Google Scholar
Yan, H., Wang, X.-S., and Zhu, R.-Z., “Derivation of the Kelvin equation,” Acta Physico-Chimica Sinica, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 640644, 2009.Google Scholar