Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T07:11:22.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Calcium phosphate with high specific surface area synthesized by a reverse micro-emulsion method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2016

Tomoaki Sugiyama ,
Shusuke Akiyama  and
Toshiyuki Ikoma
Tomoaki Sugiyama*
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy & Ceramics Science, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Ookayama 2-12-1, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Shusuke Akiyama
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy & Ceramics Science, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Ookayama 2-12-1, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan
Toshiyuki Ikoma
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy & Ceramics Science, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Ookayama 2-12-1, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan
*
*(Email: [email protected])
Get access

Abstract

A reverse micro-emulsion method has been investigated to control crystal morphology in a nanometer region and to increase specific surface area for calcium phosphate. The nanocrystals with the control of its morphology is a candidate of drug delivery carriers. This study investigated the effects of mixing volume ratios of two surfactants, tween80 (T) and aliquate 336 (A) in kerosene as an oil phase, and pH values in the nano-region on crystalline phases and specific surface area of calcium phosphate synthesized by the reverse micro-emulsion method. A di-ammonium hydrogen phosphate solution including phosphoric acid at pH of 6.3 and a calcium nitrate solution at pH of 5.7 were adjusted, and both the solutions were separately added into the kerosene with the surfactants. Both the emulsions were then mixed at the same volume and the Ca/P ratio of 1.0, and stirred at room temperature for 24 hours. The crystalline phases were dependent on the T amounts; pure DCPD with the specific surface area of 6.7 to 12 m2/g was obtained at the T/A ratio of 4, the mixture of DCPD and DCPA with that of 48 to 162 m2/g was at the ratios of 5 to 8, and a low crystalline HAp with 163 m2/g was at the ratio of 9. These specific surface areas of DCPD (T/A=4) and HAp (T/A=9) were apparently higher than those prepared with a wet method, 7.8 times and 1.8 times respectively. DCPA with 43 m2/g was successfully produced to decrease the pH of phosphate solution at T/A of 9. The change of crystalline phases would be explained as follows; the increase of T amount decreased the micro-emulsion sizes to reduce bulk water to be DCPA, and increased the pH to precipitate HAp nanocrystals.

Keywords

biomaterialpowder processingceramic
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Advances , Volume 1 , Issue 11: Nanomaterials and Synthesis , 2016 , pp. 723 - 728
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Yoneda, T., Hagino, H., Sugimoto, T., Ohta, H., Takahashi, S., Soen, S., Taguchi, A., Toyosawa, S., Nagata, T., Urade, M., J. Bone Miner. Metab., 28, 365–383 (2010).Google Scholar
Yoshida, R., Sakai, K., Okano, T., Sakurai, Y., Ad. Drug Del. Rev., 11, 85–108 (1993).Google Scholar
Drake, M.T., Clarke, B.L., Khosla, S., Mayo Clin. Proc., 83, 1032–45 (2008).Google Scholar
Ebetino, F.H., Hogan, A.M.L., Sun, S., Tsoumpra, M.K., Suan, X., Triffitt, J.T., Kwaasi, A.A., Dunford, J.E., Barnett, B.L., Oppermann, U., Lundy, M.W., Boyde, A., Kashemirov, B.A., meKenna, C.E., Russell, R.G.G., Bone, 49, 20–33 (2011).Google Scholar
Teitelbaum, S.L., Science, 289, 1504–1508 (2000).Google Scholar
Silver, I.A., Murrills, R.J., Etherington, D.J., Exp. Cell Res., 175, 266–275 (1988).Google Scholar
Nancollas, G.H., Henneman, Z.J., Urol. Res., 38, 277–280 (2010).Google Scholar
Boutonnbt, M., Kizling, J., Stenius, F., Colloids Surf., 5, 209–225 (1982).Google Scholar
Pileni, M.P., J. Phys. Chem., 97, 6961–6973 (1993).Google Scholar
Lim, H.M., Kassim, A., Huang, N.M., Hashim, R., Radiman, S., Khiew, P.S., Chiu, W.S., Ceram. Int., 35, 2891–2897 (2009).Google Scholar
Chen, L., Tang, S.Q., Wang, Y.J., Wei, K., Mater. Lett., 59, 210–214 (2005).Google Scholar
Lai, C., Wang, Y.J., Wei, K., Colloids and Surf. A, 315, 268–274 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maity, JPl, Lin, TJ, Cheng, HP, Chen, CY, Reddy, AS, Atla, SB, Chang, YF, Chen, HR, Chen, CC, Int. j. mol. Sci., 12, 3821–3830 (2011).Google Scholar
Kijima, T., Ikeda, T., Yada, M., Machida, M., Langmuir, 18, 6453–6457 (2002).Google Scholar
Uota, M., Arakawa, H., Kitamura, N., Yoshimura, T., Tanaka, J., Kijima, T., Langmuir 21, 4724–4728 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, S, Bhardwaj, P, Singh, V, Aggarwal, S, Manfsl, UK, J. Colloid Interface, Sci. 319, 322–329 (2008).Google Scholar
Singh, S, Singh, V, Aggarwal, S, Mandal, UK, Chem. Pap 64, 491–498, (2010).Google Scholar
Visser, A. J. W. G., Vos, K., Hoek, A. V., Santema, J. S.., J. Phys. Chem., 92, 759–765 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sukhorukov, G. B., Brumen, M., J. phys. Chem. B, 103, 6434–6440, (1999).Google Scholar