Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:56:35.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AFM Assessment of the Mechanical Properties of Stem Cells During Differentiation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2019

Jie Zou
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomaterial Science and Berlin-Brandenburg Centre for Regenerative Therapies, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Teltow, Germany Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Weiwei Wang
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomaterial Science and Berlin-Brandenburg Centre for Regenerative Therapies, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Teltow, Germany
Xianlei Sun
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomaterial Science and Berlin-Brandenburg Centre for Regenerative Therapies, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Teltow, Germany Institute of Chemistry, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
Wingtai Tung
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomaterial Science and Berlin-Brandenburg Centre for Regenerative Therapies, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Teltow, Germany Institute of Chemistry, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
Nan Ma*
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomaterial Science and Berlin-Brandenburg Centre for Regenerative Therapies, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Teltow, Germany Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany Helmholtz Virtual Institute − Multifunctional Materials in Medicine, Berlin and Teltow, Germany
Andreas Lendlein*
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomaterial Science and Berlin-Brandenburg Centre for Regenerative Therapies, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Teltow, Germany Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany Institute of Chemistry, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany Helmholtz Virtual Institute − Multifunctional Materials in Medicine, Berlin and Teltow, Germany
*
*To whom correspondence should be addressed: Prof. Dr. Nan Ma, Prof. Dr. Andreas Lendlein Email: [email protected] , [email protected]
*To whom correspondence should be addressed: Prof. Dr. Nan Ma, Prof. Dr. Andreas Lendlein Email: [email protected] , [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The dynamic mechanical force transmitted through microenvironments during tissue formation and regeneration continuously impacts the mechanics of cells and thereby regulates gene and protein expression. The mechanical properties are altered during the process of stem cells differentiating into different lineages. At different stages of differentiation, stem cells display different mechanical properties in response to surrounding microenvironments, which depend on the subcellular structures, especially the cytoskeleton and nucleus. The mechanical properties of the cell nucleus affect protein folding and transport as well as the condensation of chromatin, through which the cell fate is regulated. These findings raise the question as to how cell mechanics change during differentiation. In this study, the mechanical properties of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (hBMSCs) were determined during adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation by atomic force microscopy (AFM). The cytoskeletal structure and the modification of histone were investigated using laser confocal microscope and flow cytometry. The mechanical properties of cell nuclei at different stages of cell differentiation were compared. The stiffness of nuclei increased with time as osteogenesis was induced in hBMSCs. The H3K27me3 level increased during osteogenesis and adipogenesis according to flow cytometry analysis. Our results show conclusively that AFM is a facile and effective method to monitor stem cell differentiation. The measurement of cell mechanical properties by AFM improves our understanding on the connection between mechanics and stem cell fate.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mierke, C.T., Rep Prog Phys 77 (7), 076602 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Cruz, R.D., Fonseca, V.C. and Darling, E.M., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109 (24), E1523 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darling, E.M., Topel, M., Zauscher, S., Vail, T.P. and Guilak, F., J Biomech 41 (2), 454 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesen, D. and Hoh, J.H., Biophys J 88 (1), 670 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowat, A.C., Lammerding, J. and Ipsen, J.H., Biophys J 91 (12), 4649 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harwood, J.C., Kent, N.A., Allen, N.D. and Harwood, A.J., Embo Reports 20 (6) (2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuman, K.C. and Nagy, A., Nat Methods 5 (6), 491 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, P.-H., Aroush, D.R.-B., Asnacios, A., Chen, W.-C., Dokukin, M.E., Doss, B.L., Durand-Smet, P., Ekpenyong, A., Guck, J. and Guz, N.V., Nat Methods 15, 491 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babu, P.K.V., Rianna, C., Mirastschijski, U. and Radmacher, M., Sci Rep-Uk 9 (2019).Google Scholar
Bruckner, B.R. and Janshoff, A., Sci Rep-Uk 8 (2018).Google Scholar
Wang, D., Liang, X.B., Liu, Y.H., Fujinami, S., Nishi, T. and Nakajima, K., Macromolecules 44 (21), 8693 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darling, E.M., Zauscher, S., Block, J.A. and Guilak, F., Biophys J 92 (5), 1784 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimitriadis, E.K., Horkay, F., Maresca, J., Kachar, B. and Chadwick, R.S., Biophys J 82 (5), 2798 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, S., Irianto, J. and Discher, D.E., J Cell Biol 216 (2), 305 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilian, K.A., Bugarija, B., Lahn, B.T. and Mrksich, M., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107 (11), 4872 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Provenzano, P.P. and Keely, P.J., J Cell Sci 124 (8), 1195 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, M.E., Composto, R.J. and Eckmann, D.M., J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 61, 197 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, X., Liu, H., Zhu, M., Cao, C., Xu, Z., Tsatskis, Y., Lau, K., Kuok, C., Filleter, T., McNeill, H., Simmons, C.A., Hopyan, S. and Sun, Y., J Cell Sci 131 (13) (2018).Google Scholar
Guilluy, C., Osborne, L.D., Van Landeghem, L., Sharek, L., Superfine, R., Garcia-Mata, R. and Burridge, K., Nat Cell Biol 16 (4), 376 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemming, S., Cakouros, D., Isenmann, S., Cooper, L., Menicanin, D., Zannettino, A. and Gronthos, S., Stem Cells 32 (3), 802 (2014).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bannister, A.J. and Kouzarides, T., Cell Res 21 (3), 381 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juan, A.H., Wang, S., Ko, K.D., Zare, H., Tsai, P.F., Feng, X.S., Vivanco, K.O., Ascoli, A.M., Gutierrez-Cruz, G., Krebs, J., Sidoli, S., Knight, A.L., Pedersen, R.A., Garcia, B.A., Casellas, R., Zou, J.Z. and Sartorelli, V., Cell Reports 17 (5), 1369 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephens, A.D., Banigan, E.J., Adam, S.A., Goldman, R.D. and Marko, J.F., Molecular Biology of the Cell 28 (14), 1984 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dechat, T., Adam, S.A. and Goldman, R.D., Adv Enzyme Regul 49 (1), 157 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar