Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T01:56:15.428Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4D Printing of Magnetically Functionalized Chainmail for Exoskeletal Biomedical Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2019

Anna R. Ploszajski*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, Roberts Engineering Building, Torrington Place, London, UK, WC1E 7JE Institute of Making, University College London, Malet Place, London, UK, WC1E 7JE
Richard Jackson
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, Roberts Engineering Building, Torrington Place, London, UK, WC1E 7JE Institute of Making, University College London, Malet Place, London, UK, WC1E 7JE
Mark Ransley
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, Roberts Engineering Building, Torrington Place, London, UK, WC1E 7JE Institute of Making, University College London, Malet Place, London, UK, WC1E 7JE
Mark Miodownik
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, Roberts Engineering Building, Torrington Place, London, UK, WC1E 7JE Institute of Making, University College London, Malet Place, London, UK, WC1E 7JE
*
Get access

Abstract

Chainmail fabrics manufactured by selective laser sintering 3D printing have been magnetically functionalized to create a lightweight, 4D printed, actuating fabric. The post-processing method involves submerging the porous prints in commercial ferrofluid (oil-based magnetic liquid), followed by drying under heat. The actuation of the chainmail has been simulated using a rigid multi-body physics engine, and qualitatively matches experiment. Such magnetically actuating fabrics have potential to make thin, lightweight and comfortable wearable assistive devices.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hines, L., Petersen, K., Lum, G. Z., and Sitti, M., Adv. Mater. 29, 1603483 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y. and Hashimoto, M., Smart Mater. Struct., 26, 125003 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, S., Robertson, M., Ijspeert, A., and Paik, J., IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., 2 (2), 849855 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehta, J., Chandra, Y., and Tewari, R. P., Procedia Comput. Sci., 133, 569575 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polygerinos, P., Wang, Z., Galloway, K. C., Wood, R. J., and Walsh, C. J., Rob. Auton. Syst., 73, 135143 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truby, R. L. and Lewis, J. A., Nature, 540 (7633), 371378 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Emergence of "4D Printing" by Sklar Tibbits at TED2013 (2013). Available at: https://www.ted.com/talks/skylar_tibbits_the_emergence_of_4d_printing (accessed 8 December 2018).Google Scholar
Mitchell, A., Lafont, U., Ho, M., and Semprimoschnig, C., Addit. Manuf., 24 (April), 606626 (2018).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ransley, M., Smitham, P., and Miodownik, M., Smart Mater. Struct., 26, 08LT02 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar