Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:49:18.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Managing alternative sports: new organisational spaces for the diffusion of Italian parkour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2016

Raffaella Ferrero Camoletto ,
Davide Sterchele  and
Carlo Genova
Raffaella Ferrero Camoletto*
Affiliation:
Department of Cultures, Politics and Society, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
Davide Sterchele
Affiliation:
Institute for Sport, Physical Activity and Leisure, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
Carlo Genova
Affiliation:
Department of Cultures, Politics and Society, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
*
∗Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article explores the encounter between parkour as an unstructured and culturally innovative practice, challenging both physical as well as organisational spaces, and UISP (Unione Italiana Sport per Tutti/Italian Union of Sport for All) as a sport-promotion body open to organisational and cultural experimentation. Drawing on a multi-method qualitative approach (analysis of documentary material, interviews and focus groups), it looks at the role of UISP in the diffusion and legitimisation of parkour within the Italian context, investigating the interplay between the cultural and organisational logics of both this new practice itself on the one hand, and the organisations that are trying to accommodate it on the other. The incorporation in a sport-for-all organisation like UISP provides traceurs with a safe and legitimised space, which is, however, ‘loose' enough to maintain the fluidity of the practice. Nonetheless, by enabling the coexistence of different and competing definitions and uses of parkour, this fluid organisational space reproduces tensions among traceurs and weakens their voice in UISP's decision-making processes.

L'articolo esplora l'incontro tra il parkour come pratica non formalizzata e culturalmente innovativa, che costituisce una sfida dal punto di vista degli spazi sia fisici che organizzativi, e la UISP (Unione Italiana Sport per Tutti) in quanto ente di promozione sportiva aperto alla sperimentazione sia sul piano organizzativo che su quello culturale.

Sulla base di un approccio qualitativo multi-metodo (analisi di materiale documentario, interviste, focus group), ci focalizziamo sul ruolo della UISP nel processo di diffusione e legittimazione del parkour all'interno del contesto italiano, indagando l'intreccio tra logiche culturali e organizzative di questa nuova pratica, da un lato, e delle organizzazioni che stanno cercando di accoglierla, dall'altro.

L'inclusione all'interno di un ente di promozione sportiva come la UISP offre ai traceurs uno spazio sicuro e legittimo, ma al tempo stesso sufficientemente ‘flessibile’ da mantenere la fluidità della pratica.

Tuttavia, rendendo possibile la coesistenza di definizioni e usi del parkour tra loro differenti e in competizione, questo spazio organizzativo fluido riproduce le tensioni esistenti tra i traceurs e indebolisce la loro partecipazione ai processi decisionali all'interno della UISP.

Keywords

parkourspaceorganisationcultural politicsyouth
Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Italy , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , August 2015 , pp. 307 - 319
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 Association for the study of Modern Italy 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ameel, L., and Tani, S.. 2011. “Everyday Aesthetics in Action: Parkour Eyes and the Beauty of Concrete Walls.” Emotion, Space and Society 10 (1): 30–40.Google Scholar
Ameel, L., and Tani, S.. 2012. “Parkour: Creating Loose Spaces?” Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography 94 (1): 17–30. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0467.2012.00393.x.Google Scholar
Atkinson, M. 2009. “Parkour, Anarcho-Environmentalism, and Poiesis.” Journal of Sport & Social Issues 33 (2): 169–194. doi:10.1177/0193723509332582.Google Scholar
Bavinton, N. 2007. “From Obstacle to Opportunity: Parkour, Leisure, and the Reinterpretation of Constraints.” Annals of Leisure Research 10 (3–4): 391–412.Google Scholar
Benasso, S., and Stagi, L.. 2013. “Traces of Urban Bodies.” Lo Squaderno 27: 9–15.Google Scholar
Bennett, A. 1999. “Subcultures or Neo-tribes? Rethinking the Relationship Between Youth, Style and Music Taste.” Sociology 33 (3): 599–617.Google Scholar
Bordignon, F., and Ceccarini, L.. 2013. “Five Stars and a Cricket. Beppe Grillo Shakes Italian Politics.” South European Society and Politics 18 (4): 427–449. doi:10.1080/13608746.2013.775720.Google Scholar
Bornaz, N. 2008. “Parkour: l'art de subvertir le rapport à l'espace public.” http://biblio.recherche-action.fr.Google Scholar
Brown, N. 2007. “The Art of Displacement. Parkour as a Challenge to Social Perceptions of Body and Space.” http://www.parkourgenerations.com/article/art-displacement.Google Scholar
Buscarini, C. 2008. “Le organizzazioni del settore dello sport: un quadro generale d'analisi e una possibile classificazione economico-aziendale.” Quaderni monografici Rirea 72: 1–64.Google Scholar
Coates, E., Clayton, B., and Humberstone, B.. 2010. “A Battle for Control: Exchanges of Power in the Subculture of Snowboarding.” Sport in Society: Cultures, Commerce, Media, Politics 13 (7–8): 1082–1101.Google Scholar
Daskalaki, M., Stara, A., and Imas, M.. 2008. “The ‘Parkour Organisation’: Inhabitation of Corporate Spaces.” Culture and Organization 14 (1): 49–64. doi:10.1080/14759550701659029.Google Scholar
Donnelly, M. 2006. “Studying Extreme Sports: Beyond the Core Participants.” Journal of Sport and Social Issues 30 (2): 219–224. doi:10.1177/0193723506287187.Google Scholar
Edwardes, D. 2007. “Parkour.” In Berkshire Encyclopaedia of Extreme Sports, edited by Booth, D. and Thorpe, H., 233–236. Great Barrington, MA: Berkshire Reference Works.Google Scholar
Gilchrist, P., and Wheaton, B.. 2011. “Lifestyle Sport, Public Policy and Youth Engagement: Examining the Emergence of Parkour.” International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics 3 (1): 109–131. doi:10.1080/19406940.2010.547866.Google Scholar
Halford, S. 2004. “Towards a Sociology of Organizational Space.” Sociological Research Online 9 (1), http://www.socresonline.org.uk/9/1/halford.html.Google Scholar
Kidder, J. L. 2012. “Parkour, the Affective Appropriation of Urban Space, and the Real/Virtual Dialectic.” City & Community 11 (3): 229–253. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6040.2012.01406.x.Google Scholar
Leone, M. 2010. “Semiotica del parkour.” In Semiotica dello sport, edited by Cervelli, P., Romei, L., and Sedda, F., 208–224. Rome: Edizioni Nuova Cultura.Google Scholar
Ojala, A. L. 2014. “Institutionalisation in Professional Freestyle Snowboarding. Finnish Professional Riders' Perceptions.” European Journal for Sport and Society 11 (2): 103–126.Google Scholar
Ortuzar, J. 2009. “Parkour or l'art du déplacement: a kinetic urban utopia.” TDR/The Drama Review 53 (3): 54–66. doi:10.1162/dram.2009.53.3.54.Google Scholar
Porro, N. 1995. Identità, nazione, cittadinanza. Sport, società e sistema politico nell'Italia contemporanea. Rome: SEAM.Google Scholar
Porro, N. 2013. Movimenti collettivi e culture sociali dello sport europeo. Le stagioni della sportivizzazione. Acireale-Rome: Bonanno.Google Scholar
Salome, L. 2010. “Constructing Authenticity in Contemporary Consumer Culture: the Case of Lifestyle Sports.” European Journal for Sport and Society 7 (1): 69–87.Google Scholar
Saville, S. J. 2008. “Playing with Fear: Parkour and the Mobility of Emotion.” Social & Cultural Geography 9 (8): 891–914. doi:10.1080/14649360802441440.Google Scholar
Stapleton, S., and Terrio, S.. 2012. “Le Parkour: Urban Street Culture and the Commoditization of Male Youth Expression.” International Migration 50 (6): 18–27. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2435.2010.00616.x.Google Scholar
Straw, W. 1991. “Systems of Articulation, Logics of Change: Communities and Scenes in Popular Music.” Cultural Studies 5 (3): 368–388. doi:10.1080/09502389100490311.Google Scholar
Thorpe, H., and Ahmad, N.. 2013. “Youth, Action Sports and Political Agency in the Middle East: Lessons from a Grassroots Parkour Group in Gaza.” International Review for the Sociology of Sport. doi: 10.1177/1012690213490521.Google Scholar
Thorpe, H., and Wheaton, B.. 2011. “‘Generation X Games’, Action Sports and the Olympic Movement: Understanding the Cultural Politics of Incorporation.” Sociology 45 (5): 830–847. doi:10.1177/0038038511413427.Google Scholar
Wheaton, B., ed. 2004. Understanding Lifestyle Sport: Consumption, Identity and Difference. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wheaton, B. 2013. The Cultural Politics of Lifestyle Sports. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wheaton, B., and Beal, B.. 2003. “‘Keeping It Real’: Subcultural Media and the Discourses of Authenticity in Alternative Sport.” International Review for the Sociology of Sport 38 (2): 155–176. doi:10.1177/1012690203038002002.Google Scholar