Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T18:43:13.841Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Institutional and industrial changes in the Italian South: the case of Brindisi

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2016

Lidia Greco
Lidia Greco*
Affiliation:
Employment Research Centre — ERC, Department of Sociology, Trinity College, 1 College Green, Dublin 2, Ireland. Telephone: + 353 1 677 1300. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This article proposes an institutionalist reading of the processes of industrial and employment change taking place in the clothing industry in Brindisi, Italy, during the 1990s. In contrast to more orthodox economic interpretations that focus on the separation between the economy and institutions, this article assumes the centrality of institutions for an understanding of industrial and employment performances and their change over time. Institutions profoundly affect the pursuit of the objectives of profit and efficiency in that they influence the definition of what can be considered as rational in a given institutional configuration and compatible with the values that a given society holds as socially and economically legitimate.

Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Italy , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , November 2003 , pp. 187 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © Association for the study of Modern Italy 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Bruno, Michael and Sachs, Jeoffrey, Economics of Worldwide Stagflation , Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass., 1985. Drèze, Jacques and Bean, Charles, Europe's Unemployment Problem, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass., 1991. Grossman, Sanford and Hart, Oliver, ‘Implicit Contracts, Moral Hazard, and Unemployment’, American Economic Review, 71, 2, 1991, pp. 301–7.Google Scholar

2. Jevons, , Menger and Walras are traditionally considered as the authors of the ‘marginalist revolution’ that, by redefining the theory of value of the classical economists, made the economy a theory of choices entirely detached from institutional variables. Such a position much be distinguished from that put forward by the new insitutionalism. Although conceiving an initial state of nature without any institutions, this strand of literature holds that the definition of institutional arrangements is necessary in order to facilitate market interaction and to strengthen efficiency in an economic system affected by transaction costs linked to uncertainty and lack of information. See Coase, Ronald, ‘The Nature of the Firm’, Economica , 4, 1937, pp. 386–405. Williamson, Oliver, Le istituzioni economiche del capitalismo, F. Angeli, Milan, 1988.Google Scholar

3. OECD, Employment Outlook , Paris, 1997 and 1999. Artis, Michael, ‘The Unemployment Problem’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14, 3, 1998, pp. 98–109. Jackman, Richard, Wage Setting Behaviour in a Monetary Union–A Role for the European Social Partnerships, paper presented at the conference of the National Bank of Austria, Vienna 10–11 June 1999.Google Scholar

4. Marx, Karl, Il capitale , Riuniti, Rome, 1977. Polanyi, Karl, The Great Transformation, Beacon Paperback, Boston, 1944.Google Scholar

5. Costabile, Lilia, ‘Institutions, Social Custom and Efficiency Wage Models: Alternative Approaches’, Cambridge Journal of Economics , 19, 5, 1995, pp. 605–23.Google Scholar

6. Martin, Ron, ‘Institutional Approaches in Economic Geography’, in Sheppard, Eric and Barnes, Trevor (ed.), A Companion to Economic Geography , Blackwell, Oxford, 2000, pp. 77–94.Google Scholar

7. Svimez (Associazione per lo sviluppo dell'industria nel Mezzogiorno), Gli investimenti industriali agevolati nel Mezzogiorno, 1951–1968 , Giuffrè, Milan, 1971.Google Scholar

8. Hodgson defines institutions as ‘way[s] of thought or action of some prevalence and permanence, which [are] embedded in the habits of a group or the customs of a people. They are formal (e.g. rules, laws and organizations) as well as informal or tacit (e.g. habits, routines, etc.)’. Hodgson, Geoffrey, ‘The Approach to Institutional Economics’, Journal of Economic Literature , 36, 1, 1998, pp. 166–92.Google Scholar

9. Granovetter, Mark, ‘The Strength of the Weak Ties’, American Journal of Sociology , 78, 6, 1973, pp. 1360–80, and ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, 91, 3, 1985, pp. 481-510.Google Scholar

10. Powell, Walter and DiMaggio, Paul, The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11. Trigilia, Carlo, Sociologia Economica , Il Mulino, Bologna, 1998.Google Scholar

12. Aglietta, Micheal, Theory of Capitalist Regulation , Calmann-Levy, London, 1979. Boyer, Robert, ‘Labour Institutions and Economic Growth: A Survey and a “Regulationist” Approach’, Labour, 7, 1993, pp. 25–72. Boyer, Robert, The Search for Labour Market Flexibility, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13. Salais, Robert, ‘Flexibilité et conventions du travail: une approche’, Economie Appliquée , 44, 2, 1991, pp. 5–32. Salais, Robert, ‘Labour Conventions, Economic Fluctuations and Flexibility’, in Storper, Michael and Scott, Alan (eds), Pathways to Industrialization and Regional Development, Routledge, London, 1992, pp. 276–99. Storper, Michael and Salais, Robert, Worlds of Production, Harvard University Press, Cambridge Mass., 1997.Google Scholar

14. Martin, Ron, ‘Institutional Approaches in Economic Geography’, in Sheppard, Eric and Barnes, Trevor (ed.), A Companion to Economic Geography , Blackwell, Oxford, 2000, pp. 77–94.Google Scholar

15. Hine, David, Governing Italy: The Politics of Bargained Pluralism , Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993.Google Scholar

16. Martinelli, Flavia, The Governance of Post-War Development and Policy in Southern Italy: Notes for a Critical Reappraisal , paper presented at the Second European Urban and Regional Studies Conference, 17–20 September 1998, University of Durham, UK.Google Scholar

17. Ibid. Google Scholar

18. Mingione, Enzo, ‘Italy: The Resurgence of Regionalism’, International Affairs , 69, 1993, pp. 305–18.Google Scholar

19. Ginsborg, Paul, L'Italia del tempo presente , Einaudi, Turin, 1998.Google Scholar

20. Diamanti, Ilvo, Il Male del Nord: Lega, localismo, secessione , Donzelli, Rome, 1996.Google Scholar

21. Viesti, Gianfranco, ‘Cosa succede nell'economia del Mezzogiorno? Le trasformazioni 1990–1995’, Meridiana , 26–27, 1996, pp. 91–130.Google Scholar

22. Del Monte, Alfredo, Istituzioni, intervento pubblico e sviluppo del Mezzogiorno , ISPE, Rome, 1996.Google Scholar

23. Viesti, , ‘Cosa succede’, pp. 91–130.Google Scholar

24. IRI–Institute for Industrial Reconstruction, and ENI–National Hydrocarbon Board.Google Scholar

25. It should be remembered that state-controlled enterprises were obliged to locate at least 40 per cent of their total investments and 60 per cent of new investments in the South.Google Scholar

26. Ginsborg, Paul, Italy and its Discontents , Allen Lane, London, 2001, p. 298.Google Scholar

27. Il Sole-24-Ore, Libro Bianco sul Lavoro , 2002.Google Scholar

28. These countries have changed the world geography of production and consumption in that, on the one hand, they have strengthened their own indigenous industries while, on the other, they have become preferred locations for Western producers who compete on the basis of lower labour costs.Google Scholar

29. Armstrong, Harvey and Taylor, Jim, Regional Economics and Policy , Harvester Wheatsheaf, London, 1993.Google Scholar

30. Istat, , Censimento intermedio dell'industria , Istat, Rome, 1996.Google Scholar

31. Capriati, Michele, Il settore del tessile-abbigliamento nel Mezzogiorno , Rapporto per Artigianform, 1995.Google Scholar

32. The importance of the sector would increase if it were possible to quantify those working in it unofficially.Google Scholar

33. di Brindisi, Provincia, Sviluppo ed innovazione dell'economia agricola e rurale attraverso l'integrazione e la diversificazione produttiva , PIT, No. 8, 2000.Google Scholar

34. di Commercio, Camera, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Brindisi, La congiuntura economica in provincia di Brindisi , 1999.Google Scholar

35. As stated, precise data on employment/unemployment in the submerged economy of the industry is not available. Istat, , Censimento intermedio dell'industria , Istat, Rome, 1996.Google Scholar

36. Perrucci, Robert, ‘Embedded Corporatism’, The Sociological Quarterly , 35, 3, 1994, pp. 487–506. Usui, Chikako and Colignon, Richard, ‘Corporate Restructuring: Converging World Pattern or Societally Specific Embeddedness?’, The Sociological Quarterly, 37, 4, 1996, pp. 551–78. Powell, and DiMaggio, , The New Institutionalism. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

37. Interview held in Francavilla Fontana (Brindisi), May 1999.Google Scholar

38. Schoenberger, Erica, The Cultural Crisis of the Firm , Blackwell, Oxford Mass., 1997, p. 120.Google Scholar

39. For example, as explained by the owner of one company: ‘The workers have strange ideas. This area has no credibility at all on the wider clothing market and this is all the fault of the unions. They have consistently raised their voices against the poorer local enterprises but they haven't appreciated that the big firms, above all those in the North East, have maintained production for years on the back of an irregular workforce.’ Interview held in Francavilla Fontana (Brindisi), May 1999.Google Scholar

40. Interview held in Latiano (Brindisi), May 1999.Google Scholar

41. Interview held in Ceglie Messapica (Brindisi), June 1999.Google Scholar