Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:46:05.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond the wall: street art in the fight against the Camorra

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2017

Luca Palermo
Luca Palermo*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Lettere e Beni Culturali, University of Campania ‘Luigi Vanvitelli’, Italy
*
*Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The attempt to halt the remorseless spread of organised crime in the Italian South should not just be an issue for the judges, investigating magistrates and forces of order; every citizen should feel that they are an integral part of a wind of change, coming from below, that can have a decisive impact on local society. Starting from this premise, art and culture, adopting an approach of participation and involvement, can play a primary role in processes of renewal. In various areas within the provinces of Naples and Caserta, carefully researched works of street art, with the direct involvement of the local population, have provided the means for intervention in decaying and marginal environments where organised crime seemed to be so well entrenched as to be ineradicable. This article presents four case studies, analysing their assumptions, methodology and objectives.

Italian summary

Cercare di porre un freno all’incessante dilagare della criminalità organizzata nel meridione d’Italia non deve essere una questione riguardante solo giudici, magistrati e forze dell’ordine; ogni cittadino dovrebbe sentirsi parte integrante di un vento di cambiamento che, partendo dal basso, possa incidere in maniera determinate sul cambiamento sociale. Partendo da tali presupposti, l’arte e la cultura, in un’ottica partecipativa e di coinvolgimento, possono giocare un ruolo di primaria importanza in questi processi di rinnovamento. In varie aree delle province di Napoli e Caserta si è andati ad intervenire, attraverso ben studiati lavori di street art e con la diretta partecipazione della gente comune, in contesti degradati e marginali nei quali la presenza delle criminalità organizzata sembrava essere così radicata da non poter essere estirpata. Il saggio in questione presenterà tali casi di studio, analizzandone le premesse, le metodologie e gli obiettivi.

Keywords

social inclusionurban regenerationparticipationorganised crimestreet artCampania
Type
Research Article
Information
Modern Italy , Volume 22 , Special Issue 4: Special Issue: The Force of History: Modern Italian Historiography and the Legacy of Christopher Duggan , November 2017 , pp. 381 - 401
Copyright
© 2017 Association for the Study of Modern Italy 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Abarca, J. 2009. ‘El arte urbano como agente facilitador de los procesos de gentrificación’. In Arte en el espacio público: barrios artísticos y revitalización urbana, edited by B. Fernández, and J.P. Lorente, 53–64. Zaragoza: Prensas Universitarias de Zaragoza.Google Scholar
Barbagallo, F. 1999. Il potere della camorra (1973–1998). Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. 2003. ‘City of Fears, City of Hopes’. Critical Urban Studies: Occasional Papers.Google Scholar
Bencivelli, S. 2016. ‘Domande sulla Terra dei Fuochi’. Le Scienze, 2 May.Google Scholar
Bengtsen, P. 2013. ‘Beyond the Public Art Machine: A Critical Examination of Street Art as Public Art’. Journal of Art History 82 (2): 63–80.Google Scholar
Bianchini, F. 1993. ‘Remaking European Cities: The Role of Cultural Policies’. In Cultural Policy and Urban Regeneration: the West European Experience, edited by F. Bianchini, and M. Parkinson, 1–20. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Bufi, F. 2004. ‘Sparatoria a Napoli, quattordicenne in coma’. Corriere della Sera, 28 March.Google Scholar
Caldeira, T.P.R. 2000. City of Walls: Crime, Segregation, and Citizenship in São Paulo. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cartiere, C., and Willis, S., eds. 2008. The Practice of Public Art. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chaffee, L.G. 1993. Political Protest and Street Art: Popular Tools for Democratization in Hispanic Countries. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Corsi, E. 1989. ‘Napoli, i killer uccidono tra la folla’. La Repubblica, 12 November.Google Scholar
Costabile, G. 2015. C come Camorra. Naples: Rogiosi.Google Scholar
Derrida, J. 2000. Of Hospitality , translated by R. Bowlby. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. First published in French as De l’hospitalité (Paris: Calmann-Lévy, 1997).Google Scholar
Deutsche, R. 1991. ‘Alternative space’. In If You Lived Here, edited by B. Wallis, 45–66. Seattle: Bay Press.Google Scholar
Deutsche, R. 1996. Evictions: Art and Spatial Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. 1934. Art as Experience. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Di Fiore, G. 2016. La camorra e le sue storie. La criminalità organizzata a Napoli dalle origini alle paranze dei bambini. Milan: UTET.Google Scholar
Dickens, L. 2008. ‘Placing Post-Graffiti: the Journey of the Peckham Rock’. Cultural Geographies 15 (4): 471–496.Google Scholar
Doherty, C., ed. 2004. Contemporary Art: From Studio to Situation. London: Black Dog.Google Scholar
Finkelpearl, T. 2000. Dialogues in Public Art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1989 . The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: an Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, translated by T. Burger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. First published in German as Strukturwandel der Öffenlicheit (Darmstadt: Luchterhand, 1962).Google Scholar
Hein, H. 2006. Public Art: Thinking Museums Differently. Lanham, MD: Altamira.Google Scholar
Iveson, K. 2010. ‘Graffiti, Street Art and the City: Introduction’. City 14 (1–2): 25–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, M.J. 1994. ‘An Unfashionable Audience’. In Mapping the Terrain: New Genre Public Art, edited by S. Lacy, 50–59. Seattle: Bay Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Kester, G.H. 2004. Conversation Pieces: Community and Communication in Modern Art. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kwon, M. 2002. One Place After Another: Site–Specific Art and Locational Identity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lacy, S., ed. 1994. Mapping the Terrain: New Genre Public Art. Seattle: Bay Press.Google Scholar
Lacy, S. 2010. Leaving Art: Writings on Performance, Politics, and Publics, 1974–2007. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, H. 1991. The Production of Space, translated by D. Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell First published in French as La production de l’espace (Paris: Anthropos, 1974).Google Scholar
Lewisohn, C. 2008. Street Art: The Graffiti Revolution. London: Tate.Google Scholar
Loeb, C. 2014. ‘Reimagining the City: West Berlin Murals and the Right to the City’. In Lisbon Street Art & Urban Creativity: 2014 International Conference, edited by P. Soares Neves, and D.V. de Freitas Simões, 227–233. Lisbon: Urban Creativity.Google Scholar
McCoy, M. 1997. ‘Art for Democracy’s Sake’. Public Art Review 17:4–9.Google Scholar
Merola, L. 2007. Forcella tra inclusione ed esclusione sociale. Naples: Guida.Google Scholar
Montebelli, S. 2000. ‘I confini della territorialità. Viaggio e rappresentazione’. Documenti Geografici 3:1–39.Google Scholar
O’Doherty, B. 1986. Inside the White Cube: the Ideology of the Gallery Space 2nd edn. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Özkan, D. 2011. ‘Emerging Representations of “Cool” Istanbul and the Aestheticization of Urban Chaos’. Paper presented at the Eighteenth International Conference of Europeanists, Barcelona, 20–22 June.Google Scholar
Palermo, L. 2014. Public art nelle università. Storia, esperienze a confronto e metodologie di valorizzazione. Rome: Aracne.Google Scholar
Sannino, C. 2004. ‘Annalisa usata come scudo’. La Repubblica, 29 March.Google Scholar
Shearer, L. 1988. Vito Acconci: Public Places . New York: Museum of Modern Art.Google Scholar
Siani, G. 2007. Le parole di una vita. Gli scritti giornalistici, 1979–1985, 2 vols, edited by R. Giglio. Casalnuovo di Napoli: Phoebus.Google Scholar
Stano, S. 2013. ‘Signs of Impertinence … Graffiti Art and Mural Re-writing’. In Inopinatum. the Unexpected Impertinence of Urban Creativity, edited by L. Borriello, and C. Ruggiero, 175–194. Rome: University of Rome La Sapienza.Google Scholar
Tsilimpounidi, M. 2012. ‘Athens 2012: Performances in Crisis or What Happens When a City Goes Soft?’ City: Analysis of Urban Trends, Culture, Theory, Policy, Action 16 (5): 546–556.Google Scholar
Young, A. 2014. Street Art, Public City: Law, Crime and the Urban Imagination. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zagaria, C. 2015. “‘Che è amato, non dimentica”, Ponticelli quartiere della street art’. La Repubblica, Naples edition, 27 July. Available online at: http://napoli.repubblica.it/cronaca/2015/07/27/news/_chi_e_amato_non_dimentica_ponticelli_quartiere_della_street_art-119906080/.Google Scholar

Websites

http://giopistone.it.Google Scholar
http://www.agrorinasce.org.Google Scholar
http://www.alberonero.it.Google Scholar
http://www.jorit.it/index-1.html.Google Scholar
http://www.mattiacampodallorto.it.Google Scholar
http://www.orticanoodles.com.Google Scholar
http://www.inward.it.Google Scholar